CMSGT USAF (Ret)'s Avatar

CMSGT USAF (Ret)

@usairforcechief.bsky.social

If you’re going through hell - keep going! Pro democracy- screw Project 2025!

2,804 Followers  |  3,769 Following  |  1,145 Posts  |  Joined: 08.11.2024  |  1.8249

Latest posts by usairforcechief.bsky.social on Bluesky


I’m a fan of both - but I would lean Crockett. No doubt she will fight for what’s right! Proven and what the Dems and this country needs at this moment - fighters. Fight/win first, then hug and make nice. Good luck!

23.02.2026 13:30 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

The dumbing down of our electorate has seemed to have worked.

23.02.2026 13:20 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Did he also ask for someone to volunteer an actual hospital vessel since both of ours are out of commission?

23.02.2026 13:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

You either want a proven fighter or do you prefer someone more willing to work with the other side. The difference is stark.

Paxton/GOP are immediate NOs.

23.02.2026 13:06 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 1

Another example of the millions of voters who had zero idea what they were voting for.

They just knew they didn’t want a whopping 10 MTF trans athletes playing in female sports. 🙄

23.02.2026 12:35 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Once again… his accusations are more an admission of guilt.

23.02.2026 11:59 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Just another example how propaganda can seek into young, less informed and impressionable minds. Then they join a likeminded cult.

22.02.2026 13:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I know a few Justices that need to renew their “vows.”

21.02.2026 14:34 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

He doesn’t think he needs consent from women (the children he raped can’t ever consent).

He doesn’t think he needs consent from Congress.

He doesn’t think he needs consent from the Supreme Court.

He doesn’t think he needs consent from the Constitution.

He’s a rapist in every cell.

#RemoveTrump

21.02.2026 00:48 — 👍 54    🔁 19    💬 4    📌 2

It certainly bought him some undeserved time!

21.02.2026 13:24 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I would add, in my opinion, Thomas and Alito actually meet several of these accusations.

21.02.2026 12:59 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

What’s the over/under on the number of lies?

I will not expose myself to that nonsense.

21.02.2026 12:49 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I had to change the channel. My head was about to explode.

20.02.2026 19:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks David!

20.02.2026 19:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I understand you are incapable of understanding there exists the capability to consider news over a fox branded broadcast as Fox News. I on the other hand am capable of understanding that concept. I’m done with your belligerent ass. Fucking fool.

20.02.2026 19:09 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

BTW you conveniently left off the original para of post. I bet even your belligerent ass can understand the statement. It clearly shows I understand.

The second para shows I’m giving the poster some leeway because there are two versions of news with Fox affiliations. Again, Cognitive empathy.

20.02.2026 19:04 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The over air local news on Fox broadcasts is absolutely covered by FCC guidance, period/fact.

So what does an individual call the news on Fox if all they watch is over-air broadcasts?

I mean…Some may even call it Fox News. Thus I gave the poster some leeway and avoided being a belligerent tool.

20.02.2026 18:48 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Well aware of the FCC guidance. Unsure how the original poster was determining the meaning of “Fox News”…the local news broadcasted over-air or the national cable version. 2 paragraphs - two separate thoughts.

20.02.2026 18:41 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

🙄

20.02.2026 15:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

It’s amazing you actually understood my shorthand reference! You’re a good Lizard… here’s your ⭐️

20.02.2026 15:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

20.02.2026 15:02 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

🙄

20.02.2026 15:01 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I came to this thread fully understanding the FCC BS rule change. I also can see how someone could think Fox News is broadcasted. I was never confused. Called cognitive empathy. Try it sometime.

20.02.2026 15:01 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Not me… again, your lack of cognitive empathy shines brightly. I get it.

20.02.2026 14:57 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

🙄

20.02.2026 14:53 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

True… but to some who may only watch broadcast TV, the “FOX News” terminology can be something different than those that watch the national cable version.

20.02.2026 14:53 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

lol…what are you 10? I understand completely; especially your lack of cognitive empathy.

That’s a big concept for you so I’ll give you a few to explore.

3-2-1 on more playground antics.

20.02.2026 14:46 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 3    📌 0

Your narcissistic replies says it all. Attack the messenger; very Trumpy. U Refuse to understand how the original poster could be confused…you can absolutely watch news via a fox labeled station over an antenna (that’s a broadcasted signal). Again, I understand THE Faux News is exempt. 🙄

20.02.2026 14:34 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Slow roll u triggered responses sparky. I’m simply pointing out how the original poster could be confused by “Fox News” being a broadcast entity. I’m fully aware of the version most of us understand is the cable version exempt from FCC guidelines. It’s called reading to understand without attacking.

20.02.2026 14:23 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0
Post image

One more time for the small minded folks who are unable to comprehend why the original poster…not me, was confused by “Fox News” being a broadcast station. Because you can get “Fox News” via a digital antenna. It isn’t the cable version which you and I and most understood. Context matters.

20.02.2026 14:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 4    📌 0

@usairforcechief is following 19 prominent accounts