Naph Torrance's Avatar

Naph Torrance

@naphtor.bsky.social

Nominally a brand strategist, but I mainly tweet boring shit about Arsenal FC.

209 Followers  |  317 Following  |  502 Posts  |  Joined: 11.12.2024  |  2.4631

Latest posts by naphtor.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Arsenal Season Preview

And would def recommend the previews btw, link is here:
www.thetransferflow.com/p/arsenal-se...

06.08.2025 09:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Saw this simple table in @thetransferflow.bsky.social Arsenal Season Preview, and IMO neatly summed up what we've tried to do this summer.

Obvious caveats to the stats apply, but we've prioritised

Goals & Assistsโœ…
Impact โœ…
Availability โœ…

Fingers crossed it translates

06.08.2025 09:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Perfect weekend listening. Thank you!

02.08.2025 12:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think it is very evident on Twitter. (Which, increasingly I am finding unbearable)

31.07.2025 15:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

I also think this is another angle that has really stirred the pot in the past weeks/months

31.07.2025 15:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah amazing thank you. And def didn't want to take for granted you'd do one! Just think they're hugely valuable to get to know the player โ€“ really appreciate the work you & the gang do โค๏ธ

29.07.2025 16:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hey @towells.bsky.social @alexcollings.bsky.social @watman.bsky.social really enjoying the Snapshots (as usual) โ€“ was wondering, was there a Mosquera one that I missed? Or was he skipped?

29.07.2025 14:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Well there's someone I totally forgot existed.

29.07.2025 13:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sure - either side is a gamble. There are no non-risks.

I would personally take fewer, better.

27.07.2025 12:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think you need a balance of the two, obviously.

Liverpool don't compromise on resale value (apart from v small ticket buys like Endo) and it allows them to e.g. sell Minamino for profit, make money back for Darwin, get a stupid fee for Diaz, etc. And โ€“ unfortunately โ€“ they've won plenty.

27.07.2025 11:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

He doesn't need to replace Trossard straight away, he'd be taking Sterling's place. Which he could comfortably do.

And he is an example, not a definitive suggestion. There are absolutely players able to be 5th or 6th attacker for Arsenal for ยฃ30m.

27.07.2025 11:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm not a scout or analyst, but there are undoubtedly players available for ยฃ25-35m who could improve on the ghost of Raheem Sterling and a declining Trossard.

Igor Paixao was linked previously. Assane Diao went to Como for under โ‚ฌ15m. There are always players. Shopping outside PL helps.

27.07.2025 11:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It was made public by Newcastle journos he "wasn't for sale at any price" just weeks ago. So that's not particularly compelling.

If you want to do the specifics of the fees the figures we largely know are what I put before, totalling ยฃ184m.

Say Isak is ยฃ150m, there's still leeway for a winger.

27.07.2025 11:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Right so like I said this is all speculation, but youโ€™re taking the highest end of the Isak fee and lower end of an Eze fee.

If I were to do the same Liverpool allegedly offering ยฃ130m and Parish saying they wonโ€™t sell for under ยฃ68m

Not really worth debating hypothetical specifics

27.07.2025 11:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Obviously these are not concrete so not definitive, but donโ€™t think thatโ€™s right.

ยฃ52.5 + ยฃ63.5 + ยฃ68 =ยฃ184m.

Not to mention wages around ยฃ450/500kpw.

Even extremely conservatively thereโ€™s about ยฃ20m and ยฃ75kpw for a winger.

27.07.2025 11:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

To look at it another way: I would prefer to spend ยฃ100m+ on Isak and sign a cheap promising winger than sign Gyokeres, Eze, and Madueke for roughly the same money.

27.07.2025 11:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes those things are v good! Iโ€™m pleased about them.

But donโ€™t think that last point is quite true:

Our STs are 26, 27, and a crocked 28.

Our CM options are 18, 26, 26, 26, 29, 31 (and poss adding 27).

27.07.2025 11:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But then why sign a 27yo to do that? Your ST options are 27, 27, and 28 (and crocked).

That's bad squad planning IMO (and that's aside from concerns about his playing style matching ours). Get someone with high ceiling and potential resale value. And that doesn't have to be Sesko fwiw.

27.07.2025 10:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thatโ€™s precisely my point, if one of them is available in an otherwise tricky ST market.

Plus talent aside, there are other parts of the deal I dislike. If he flops no one is taking a 29yo on ยฃ200kpw (apart from Saudi, whom we have never sold to). Too big a risk for me.

27.07.2025 10:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

All the reporting suggests we closed the door once Newcastle got CL.

Maybe we did enquire, but we didnโ€™t force it at all - which is what Liverpool seem to have done.

Yes maybe it ends up in new contract, but would have liked us to push not count ourselves out.

27.07.2025 10:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sure, but that 3rd position is prob costing another ยฃ60m. Big outlay.

On VG: Iโ€™m sure you know the caveats about his goal record as do I. I think itโ€™s pretty clear heโ€™s not elite and at 27 is unlikely to become elite. Heโ€™s prob good - which may be enough! But this is where that 2nd point comes in.

27.07.2025 10:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think there are prob 3 elite attackers moving this summer: Wirtz, Isak, Rodrygo (each with own risks tbf).

Weโ€™re seemingly going for numbers (CF, Winger, AM/LW) over an elite option.

I see the logic, but itโ€™s a choice that when combined with other things eg age of player is a big risk IMO.

27.07.2025 09:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
27.07.2025 08:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ok. Feel free to disagree.

Will be very glad if it pays off.

27.07.2025 08:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

In attack, broadly

27.07.2025 08:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Arsenal have made big gambles this summer.

On quantity over elite quality
On older players w/ little resale value
And perhaps the biggest, on a DoF who โ€˜prizes relationships over dataโ€™

Not what I would do and I worry itโ€™ll set us back long term. But if we win something major, will have paid off ๐Ÿคž

27.07.2025 06:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Newcastleโ€™s implosion would be SO much more enjoyable if they werenโ€™t selling their best players to our biggest competitors.

26.07.2025 17:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sure it's childish, but that screenshot made me snort

25.07.2025 10:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Last season was a weird & unusual one. And even then, Isak in for Merino @ 9 puts us in a pretty great position.

Put simply: I'd take Isak over 2 Gyok/Noni/Eze-tier players. You may not, that's fine. On price, same thing really which is roughly same outlay.

24.07.2025 15:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Right. Plus I doubt they're "best friends" at boardroom level now they publicly bullied Newcastle out of Ekitike, too.

24.07.2025 14:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@naphtor is following 20 prominent accounts