Caspar Donnison's Avatar

Caspar Donnison

@caspardonnison.bsky.social

Economist at LLNL, researching across several disciplines; enthusiast of national parks, triathlons, and long-distance trains; nerd of SF Bay Area marine traffic and political philosophy ๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒฟ

99 Followers  |  121 Following  |  35 Posts  |  Joined: 22.08.2024  |  2.9558

Latest posts by caspardonnison.bsky.social on Bluesky

b)

10.07.2025 00:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

This was just posted by @tbretc.bsky.social on another platform. The Chicago Sun-Times obviously gets ChatGPT to write a โ€˜summer readsโ€™ feature almost entirely made up of real authors but completely fake books. What are we coming to?

20.05.2025 11:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 12978    ๐Ÿ” 3826    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 770    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1884
A line graph illustrating the relationship between cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions and global surface temperature increase. The title reads: โ€œEvery tonne of COโ‚‚ emissions adds to global warming.โ€ A subtitle states: โ€œGlobal surface temperature increase since 1850โ€“1900 (ยฐC) as a function of cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions (GtCOโ‚‚).โ€

Y-axis (vertical): Labeled โ€œFind outโ€ on the left side (as a humorous annotation), with the actual scale running from 0ยฐC to 3ยฐC, representing the temperature increase.

X-axis (horizontal): Labeled โ€œFuck aroundโ€ at the bottom (as a humorous annotation), with a scale ranging from 0 to 4500 GtCOโ‚‚, indicating cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions since 1850.

A black jagged line represents historical global warming data, rising steadily from near 0ยฐC to about 1.1ยฐC as cumulative emissions reach approximately 2500 GtCOโ‚‚.

The graph highlights a near-linear relationship between cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions and global temperature increase, as stated in a text box within the plot area.

Five colored shaded regions (with corresponding trend lines) represent different future emission scenarios (until 2050):

SSP1-1.9 (light blue)

SSP1-2.6 (blue)

SSP2-4.5 (orange)

SSP3-7.0 (red-orange)

SSP5-8.5 (red)

These scenario pathways show increasing temperature outcomes with higher emissions, with SSP1-1.9 leading to the lowest warming and SSP5-8.5 to the highest.

The graph replaces conventional axis labels with the meme-inspired phrases โ€œFuck aroundโ€ (X-axis) and โ€œFind outโ€ (Y-axis), emphasizing the consequence of emissions on global warming.

A line graph illustrating the relationship between cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions and global surface temperature increase. The title reads: โ€œEvery tonne of COโ‚‚ emissions adds to global warming.โ€ A subtitle states: โ€œGlobal surface temperature increase since 1850โ€“1900 (ยฐC) as a function of cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions (GtCOโ‚‚).โ€ Y-axis (vertical): Labeled โ€œFind outโ€ on the left side (as a humorous annotation), with the actual scale running from 0ยฐC to 3ยฐC, representing the temperature increase. X-axis (horizontal): Labeled โ€œFuck aroundโ€ at the bottom (as a humorous annotation), with a scale ranging from 0 to 4500 GtCOโ‚‚, indicating cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions since 1850. A black jagged line represents historical global warming data, rising steadily from near 0ยฐC to about 1.1ยฐC as cumulative emissions reach approximately 2500 GtCOโ‚‚. The graph highlights a near-linear relationship between cumulative COโ‚‚ emissions and global temperature increase, as stated in a text box within the plot area. Five colored shaded regions (with corresponding trend lines) represent different future emission scenarios (until 2050): SSP1-1.9 (light blue) SSP1-2.6 (blue) SSP2-4.5 (orange) SSP3-7.0 (red-orange) SSP5-8.5 (red) These scenario pathways show increasing temperature outcomes with higher emissions, with SSP1-1.9 leading to the lowest warming and SSP5-8.5 to the highest. The graph replaces conventional axis labels with the meme-inspired phrases โ€œFuck aroundโ€ (X-axis) and โ€œFind outโ€ (Y-axis), emphasizing the consequence of emissions on global warming.

Here's a figure from IPCC AR6 Summary for Policymakers showing the linear relationship between fucking around and finding out.

Every tonne of COโ‚‚ we add to the atmosphere makes things worse for us and all other living things.

15.05.2025 12:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 332    ๐Ÿ” 146    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9    ๐Ÿ“Œ 10
Post image Post image

Ship of the Day, in the SF Bay. This is the Heavy Load Carrier โ€˜UHL Freshโ€™ (built 2024: very fresh!), coming from Brazil to the US West Coast: headed to the Port of Stockton. I couldnโ€™t find out what itโ€™s carrying today, possibly wind turbine parts as it has shipped these before. #shipoftheday

10.05.2025 16:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Introducing the "tree ring plot": a new way to visualize global surface temperatures. Each ring is a year, and each colored cell represents a day in global average temperatures (compared to a 1850-1900 preindustrial baseline).

25.04.2025 21:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 305    ๐Ÿ” 107    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 7    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4
Post image

Stirring talk at SF Climate Week from @globalecoguy.bsky.social & @projectdrawdown.bsky.social on their new โ€˜Drawdown Explorerโ€™: an online data-driven tool that will empower people to explore climate solutions in their own communities. Launching in June!

21.04.2025 23:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 23    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™ve lived in California car-free for 5yrs, fueled by European stubbornness. Similarly, many here stick to their cars, even in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the Bay Bridge into SF. So how can we facilitate sustainable behavior shifts? Improving alternative travel options is a big part of it.

21.04.2025 17:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

SF Climate Week! And it started for me aboard the Klamath vessel, with a panel discussion on sustainable travel in the Bay Area: electric ferries are coming in 2026 ๐Ÿ˜Š

21.04.2025 17:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

The early morning Amtrak from Oakland to Sacramento: great views, relaxing, WiFi to do morning emails = better than driving.

11.03.2025 16:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

This is a Ro-Ro ship, meaning โ€˜roll-on/roll-offโ€™ (a vehicle carrier). Her name is โ€˜Hyperion Rayโ€™ and she has a capacity of approx 10k cars! #shipoftheday in the Bay.

08.03.2025 17:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The abuse of GWP* was revealed in my paper with Caspar Donnison ( doi.org/10.1088/1748... ). Explaining metrics to the House of Lords was an interesting experience here committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/129705/pdf/ . Their report reflected our contribution well.

11.02.2025 19:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

They shouldnโ€™t be doing that, & got fined for it. They rapidly built a supply-chain to 7 Mt annually: it requires huge oversight. From what Iโ€™ve read, the vast majority of it works well. And it can & should work better, the new sustainability requirements reflect this.

11.02.2025 18:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

CCGT was on the cards if the biomass didnโ€™t go ahead, but whether it would have replaced all the coal, we donโ€™t know; either way, the alternative to bioenergy would have been increased fossil fuel use vs what we have now.

11.02.2025 01:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If, like me, you sometimes get bamboozled with the various metrics used in climate science, this letter is a masterclass in communicating the difference, and why it matters.

10.02.2025 15:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 25    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If Drax didnโ€™t convert from burning coal to burning biomass over ten years ago, the UK would not be coal free in 2025. Many people donโ€™t like biomass burning, but it is undeniably much better for the climate than burning fossil fuels.

10.02.2025 17:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The debate continues on the climate impact of livestock methane, so confused by the GWP* tool. As Donal says in his letter, every tonne of methane causes warming equally; farmers are being misled by a false narrative that some count less than others.

10.02.2025 15:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Look at that rain forecast map!! I decided to be sensible this morning and take my bike on the bus down the hill on my commute to work.

04.02.2025 15:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Happy Tuesday! From the SF Bay Area, where we are being pummeled by an atmospheric-river fueled storm. After a very dry January, weโ€™re expected to get around 3 inches of rain in the next few hours.

04.02.2025 15:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

This was the traffic at 6:15am on the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge today. The BART train runs this route every few minutes. Culture change - to public transit - is hard, yes, but this is a massive open goal: people donโ€™t want to be stuck in traffic at 6am!

28.01.2025 15:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Pine martens are also near my hometown in mid Wales, which is very cool. Havenโ€™t seen one yet, I hear they are very secretive.

22.01.2025 16:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

San Francisco has been particularly affected by hybrid/remote working changes since 2019. Still, with car traffic second only to NYC thereโ€™s a massive opportunity to get more stressed and delayed motorists out of cars and onto Bay Area trains!

13.01.2025 17:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

โ€˜The San Francisco traffic is getting worseโ€™ from the SF Chronicle. Itโ€™s the 2nd worst US metro area for traffic and yet the Chronicle still reports motorist aversion to using public transport (BART). Downtown BART exits are only a third of their 2019 levels!

www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/t...

13.01.2025 17:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€œFactory closures highlight the turbulent shift to a green economy, exposing political challenges and the urgent need for an equitable move to net-zero.โ€ Without one, climate goals will be derailed.

06.01.2025 19:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Welcome to Food/ClimateSky!

- sharing silly thoughts is called โ€œmanurepostingโ€

- we donโ€™t say โ€œlolโ€ or โ€œlmaoโ€ we say โ€œNโ‚‚Oโ€ or โ€œNโ‚‚OOOOโ€

- like methane, our posts are forgotten relatively quickly but are 80 times more potent than othersโ€™ posts over a 20-year time period

12.11.2024 21:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 183    ๐Ÿ” 27    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 5
Post image

The train is a great alternative to driving between the Bay Area and Sacramento. Iโ€™ve done it so many times and I still stare in wonder at the views. Less stress, less pollution, good WiFi, conversations with nice people. Todayโ€™s train is the busiest Iโ€™ve seen post-pandemic!

08.11.2024 21:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The worse a city is for cars the better it is for pedestrians, public transit, and cyclists!

03.10.2024 02:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Eating less beef is a climate solution. Here's why that's hard for some American men Climate researchers have long grappled with how to get Americans to eat less beef, a food with a huge global warming impact. Now some are thinking about it through the lens of gender.

Fellow dudes.

We eat a lot of beef.

Eating less beef and more of nearly anything else would greatly reduce the climate impacts of our food choices.

And we can still be manly men.

19.09.2024 23:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 386    ๐Ÿ” 98    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 27    ๐Ÿ“Œ 34
Preview
Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions - Nature Communications While accounting for intrinsic differences between short- and long-lived greenhouse gases, solely relying on soil carbon sequestration in grasslands to offset warming effect of emissions from current ...

And this other recent paper also addresses the topic: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

12.09.2024 03:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is a fascinating topic that I did not know about. Rain absorbs CO2 as it falls and deposits this in the oceans. It impacts ocean-air flux by 1) increasing ocean turbulence and 2) altering the air-sea CO2 concentration gradient. Rain increases the ocean C sink by 5-7%!

30.08.2024 18:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I oil mine but I have been seriously considering switching to a waxed chain because Iโ€™m getting fed up with oil on my clothes! Interested to hear your thoughts on the performance difference though?

30.08.2024 00:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@caspardonnison is following 20 prominent accounts