thank you!
06.02.2026 22:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@imbeccable.bsky.social
a friend and legend
thank you!
06.02.2026 22:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0thank you!
06.02.2026 22:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0for the minions-curious:
bsky.app/profile/furi...
can somebody tell me when the minions figure skater is scheduled to perform
06.02.2026 21:02 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0bob odenkirk did a voiceover introducing the terrier group
04.02.2026 02:33 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0the dog show just did a tribute to catherine o’hara
04.02.2026 02:28 — 👍 19 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0if you’re watching “industry” and not reading katie’s recaps, are you even watching “industry”???
02.02.2026 22:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.co Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 12:02 PM To: Elon Musk Subject: congragulations
congragulations
31.01.2026 03:13 — 👍 7730 🔁 1234 💬 115 📌 229photo of the frozen east river looking toward lower manhattan
i can confirm that the east river is frozen
30.01.2026 22:57 — 👍 230 🔁 34 💬 2 📌 3looked at my weather app and saw that monday has a high of 32 and thought, “wow, that will be nice!” 😭
30.01.2026 15:26 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0the debut of our stun cam
30.01.2026 03:56 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0if i had a secret apartment at the providence place mall, i would’ve been at the cheesecake factory every night
29.01.2026 03:01 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0thrilling to think that i could’ve walked the halls of the providence place mall alongside one of the secret mall apartment people, what a rush (but there’s not enough cheesecske factory in the doc; the providence cheesecake factory is stunning and an important part of the mall…)
29.01.2026 02:54 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0the court street trader joe’s, empty and well-stocked
idk what everyone’s talking about, my trader joe’s is a well-stocked ghost town
25.01.2026 19:36 — 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Michael Porter Jr. is having a ball in Brooklyn, but this is a different kind of star turn www.cbssports.com/nba/news/mic...
13.01.2026 15:14 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0an ad for “owning manhattan” that reads, “we have a square foot fetish”
hyphens are important ❤️
20.12.2025 03:54 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0wrote about (eyes go black) SIX SSSEEEEVVVEEEENNNNNNNN www.theringer.com/2025/12/16/p...
16.12.2025 15:38 — 👍 58 🔁 17 💬 12 📌 8👀
13.12.2025 01:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0New from me: The internet promised the democratization of information, power, and expression. Now there are vanishingly few ways to be online that don't involve being a billboard.
I wrote about the weird — and sometimes devastating — experience of being *influenced*
www.theverge.com/cs/features/...
Oh it somehow got even more boring than the beige from last year www.theverge.com/24316196/pan...
04.12.2025 13:56 — 👍 52 🔁 13 💬 4 📌 1a box of gingerbread-flavored ice cream sandwiches called chilly bears
i’ve been trying to remember the name of this gingerbread-flavored ice cream sandwich brand for like 30 years and it just… came to me. i can still taste them, they were so good…
04.12.2025 02:31 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0where is the plane www.theguardian.com/world/2025/d...
03.12.2025 05:02 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i need to know what happened with it!!!
26.11.2025 22:28 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i can’t believe he was shamed out of continuing the bamboo metaphor
26.11.2025 22:18 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0If reading about college students using AI to cheat made you feel crazy, wait till you hear about where they get their news
24.11.2025 15:08 — 👍 44 🔁 13 💬 4 📌 3Update November 22. We’ve updated this article after realising we contributed to a perfect storm of misunderstanding around a recent change in the wording and placement of Gmail’s smart features. The settings themselves aren’t new, but the way Google recently rewrote and surfaced them led a lot of people (including us) to believe Gmail content might be used to train Google’s AI models, and that users were being opted in automatically. After taking a closer look at Google’s documentation and reviewing other reporting, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Gmail does scan email content to power its own “smart features,” such as spam filtering, categorisation, and writing suggestions. But this is part of how Gmail normally works and isn’t the same as training Google’s generative AI models. Google also maintains that these feature settings are opt-in rather than opt-out, although users’ experiences seem to vary depending on when and how the new wording appeared. It’s easy to see where the confusion came from. Google’s updated language around “smart features” is vague, and the term “smart” often implies AI—especially at a time when Gemini is being integrated into other parts of Google’s products. When the new wording started appearing for some users without much explanation, many assumed it signalled a broader shift. We’ve revised this article to reflect what we can confirm from Google’s documentation, as it’s always been our aim to give readers accurate, helpful guidance.
If you have been sharing that Malwarebytes article on the Gmail thing, you should note the giant correction up top.
www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/20...
Hmm @katiebakes.bsky.social wrote the best piece I’ve read all year www.theringer.com/2025/11/18/p...
19.11.2025 02:41 — 👍 16 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 2the post should’ve been titled “bamboozled” but other than that, no notes ❤️
18.11.2025 02:36 — 👍 89 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 2“longshot presidential candidate” is a hell of a type
18.11.2025 02:21 — 👍 29 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Credit where credits due: ol boy really delivered here lmao
18.11.2025 01:27 — 👍 579 🔁 44 💬 16 📌 1