Photo of an eagle owl
Sunday photo
Eagle owl (on the Isle of Lewis)
@kenanmalik.bsky.social
Writer & Observer columnist. Latest book: Not So Black and White (Hurst). “Unsettles the pieties of contemporary race-talk” - Paul Gilroy. “A work of immense scholarship” – Jon Bloomfield. Website: https://kenanmalik.com/
Photo of an eagle owl
Sunday photo
Eagle owl (on the Isle of Lewis)
“It is less that AI is the cause of degradation in reading and thinking, and more that the creation of a culture that views knowledge primarily in an instrumental manner has made it easier to misuse AI.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column: observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
03.08.2025 07:59 — 👍 67 🔁 34 💬 1 📌 3Thank you
27.07.2025 13:04 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Photo of the bridges of Newcastle
Sunday photo
Bridges of Newcastle
“What Fanon had discovered was a contradiction that has shaped the modern world - between societies that defined themselves through a commitment to equality and social practices that denied such equality to the majority of people.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
27.07.2025 08:36 — 👍 17 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 2Photograph of the London skyline taken from Shooters Hill
Sunday photo
London skyline (from Shooters Hill)
“The very desire to control the narrative by curtailing public information not only undermines democracy but leads inevitably to the narrative spinning out of control.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column: observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
20.07.2025 09:28 — 👍 16 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 1“The very desire to control the narrative by curtailing public information not only undermines democracy but leads inevitably to the narrative spinning out of control.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column, online today, in print tomorrow: observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
19.07.2025 09:13 — 👍 1 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Certainly the right push it (and it is very much a rightwing argument). But so did New Labour with its "Respect" agenda.
14.07.2025 22:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The process began long before Starmer. It's been 30 years in the making.
14.07.2025 22:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So, social democratic parties haven't moved away from their working class constituencies? And I'm sure the Murdoch press is full of condemnations the conservative mainstream embracing ethnonationalist and white identitarian tropes and how that's allowing out-and-out racists to be more assertive.
14.07.2025 21:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0Well, that degenerated very quickly. And what a brilliant argument that is.
14.07.2025 21:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Let's see. Vivek Chibber. Paul Gilroy. Wendy Brown. Hans Kundnani. Adolph Reed. Catherine Liu. Kenneth Warren. But I won't go on - you've obviously got a bizarre notion of what it is to be "on the left".
14.07.2025 21:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0No, I don't see much point in carrying on if you can't read.
14.07.2025 21:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1And it's silly to have to point out that your original claim makes no sense.
14.07.2025 21:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, it's a trend about which many others on on the left have been warning for years.
14.07.2025 21:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And where am I "constructing an imaginary conservative 'working class' (the word 'white' is implicit)" rather than challenging?
14.07.2025 21:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0My article is about how mainstream conservative support for ethnic notions of national identity and their defence of white identity have helped pave the way for out-and-out-racism. I'm not sure why that contradicts what I've previously said. Here it is again: observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
14.07.2025 21:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Your understanding of Bluesky seems to be as deep as your understanding of what I am saying.
14.07.2025 21:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0No, I haven’t turned replies off. My replies are permanently on. But the OP to whom I’m replying (@crookedfootball.bsky.social) limited replies to his OP to those he’s following or those who follow him, and that applies to the whole thread, including my response.
14.07.2025 21:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Given that my whole article is about how mainstream conservative support for ethnic notions of national identity and defence of white identity have helped pave the way for out-and-out-racism, it might help if you had actually read the article. But, here it is again: observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
14.07.2025 21:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0...to those he’s following or who follow him. Which is why some could respond to my reply.
For the record, my replies are permanently on.
Can people please learn how @bsky.app works before making idiotic comments such as this (there have been a few of these). In @bsky.app, the OP sets the options for the thread, including all responses, and in this case, the OP to whom I was replying limited replies...
14.07.2025 21:21 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Your understanding of Bluesky seems to be as deep as your understanding of free speech, or my politics.
14.07.2025 21:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0No, I haven’t turned replies off. My replies are permanently on. But the OP to whom I’m replying (@crookedfootball.bsky.social) limited replies to his OP to those he’s following or who follow him, and and in @bsky.app that applies to the whole thread, including my response.
14.07.2025 21:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Far from “assuming working class whites are all racists and troglodytes”, that’s precisely what I’m arguing against, and always have, eg
kenanmalik.com/2019/12/23/s...
On the contrary, “an imaginary conservative 'working class' (the word 'white' is implicit)” is precisely what I’m arguing against, and always have, eg kenanmalik.com/2019/12/23/s...
14.07.2025 21:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0It’s precisely that caricature that I’m arguing against, and always have, eg kenanmalik.com/2019/12/23/s...
14.07.2025 21:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Which is why my whole article is about how mainstream conservative support for ethnic notions of national identity and their defence of white identity have helped pave the way for out-and-out-racism observer.co.uk/news/opinion...
14.07.2025 21:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0