Strange how nobody who claims this can name the scientist who started this "hoax."

Department of Education Proposal Excludes Public Health Degrees from “Professional Degree” Definition Discover the new results and implications of Dept of Ed consensus regarding professional degree programs and public health education.

🚨Dept. of Education proposes to exclude public health degrees from the “professional degree” category.

That means new public health experts could lose access to key higher ed resources, like loan limits & reimbursement.

A bold strategy to let infectious diseases win! 🦠

aspph.org/department-o...

Ghislaine Maxwell lied about Trump never going to Epstein's house (directly contradicted by her email correspondence with Epstein), and she was rewarded for that lie with a transfer to a cushier prison. The coverup is happening in plain sight.

You can't land a job living like one did in 1980. Cell phone at minimum. In most of the country, you have to have a car. The range of jobs that came to require a BA has gone way up. Not a reason to romanticize the past, but some things have changed for the worse.

So if you want to know what current LLMs can do, do you ask someone else to put in a prompt? (Happy to do it if you need someone)

Given the growing problem of microplastics in commercially sold fish, I'd say you've found the proper use for a fish going forward.

Not allowed to attend in your private capacities?

Sure you can. And change the locks after you've done it.

CO2 at 0.0424% is enough to scatter enough infrared to cause enough warming to lead to a crisis. The math for that was done in 1937. If it's a hoax, there was a hoaxer. Name him.

So. You can't. QED. None of you guys have any idea what you're talking about.

No. Scientists were talking about global warming before today's democratic politicians and green economy workers were even born. If it's a hoax, there was a hoaxer. Name him.

Nothing empty about it. If climate change is a hoax, there was a hoaxer. All the work done to discover it is public. So the author should take you under 10 minutes to find. Yet none of you seem able to do it. Can't navigate a scientific library, son?

And here you are, spouting the allegation of a "hoax," unable to name the scientist who started it, even though it's trivially easy in this day and age, and unable to talk about it like an adult. Why are you acting like you're still 12?

Are you 12?

Still unable to name the scientist who started this "hoax." Hint: if it's a hoax, the hoaxer did this before anyone involved in carbon credits was even born,.

If you can't even name the scientist who started this "hoax," you have no idea how they're funded or what their incentives are. So name the scientist. Should take you under 10 minutes to find his name.,

Thank you for demonstrating the point as usual. It's a trivially easy task and not one of you geniuses can do it.

Funny how nobody who calls it the "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.

And not one of them can name the scientist who started this "hoax". Global warming is the only case where there's an allegation of scientific misconduct and no ability to name the alleged culprit.

Doesn't take many characters to type the first and last name of this scientist. Should take under 10 minutes to find that name. Yet none of you can do it.

Funny how nobody who calls it a "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.

They go back far enough to register hundreds of hurricanes. This is the very first one to stay at cat-5 for 36 hours. Previous record was 18 hours.

You're still sounding like basic math is a hoax to you. example: Melissa stayed at Cat-5 for 36 hours. That's the longest time a hurricane spent at cat-5 on record. The previous record is 18 hours. Do you understand? Or am I right, and basic math is a hoax to you?

Sounds like basic math is a scam to you.

Strange how nobody who says this can come up with the name of the scientist who started this "scam." It's a trivially easy task yet not one of you geniuses can do it.

Pretty weird how that "myth" shows up every time you put CO2 in an infrared spectrography setup. Known for over 150 years.

Pretty weird how those "CO2 ghosts" show up every time you put a sample of CO2 through an infrared spectroscopy setup.

Pretty weird for a "myth" to be trivially re-confirmed every time someone measures the infrared absorption of CO2

Funny how nobody who calls it a "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.

Funny how nobody who calls it a "climate hoax" can name the scientist who started it.