And you don't even reply to the above post that brings up the point of those placeholders not actually making it into the final game, shame on you for hatefarming.

If Angus Reid of all people have the Liberals ahead, the Cons were going to get destroyed lmao.

Just to be clear, these are me trying to re-create poses/scenes from various different series.

First post here, thought I'd just start posting random things. I've been trying to teach myself drawing, here's some sketching I've been working on.

I wouldn't call 2% relevant lol.

Coping, probably. Jeneroux didn't vote on the Con resolution today, so he's (PP) trying to avoid panicking.

Was very close in the last election though. It was Edmonton.

But if he is indeed a Red Tory, then it's safe to say that most of his riding would not be in favour of the how the Cons are conducting themselves right now.

First paragraph in his resignation letter was asking not to contact his family. Take that as you will.

Apparently there are rumours of several more crossing the floor as well.

Also, if you look at the province breakdown on 338, the only real drop seems to be in Atlantic Canada for some reason, where the Liberals are still quite a bit ahead

Again, not statistically different from their last poll.

I prefer to think of it as a major step down from the well over 200 seats he was going to get. That itself seems like an accomplishment for the Liberals.

Yep. Election talk has made people realize that PP could get in if they aren't careful.

Also, based on a poll that cultmtl showed the other day, most people don't actually want an election. I suppose the difference is here, people may like other parties, but recognize stability is important right now.

Does it? 56% want an election here, and 44% think the Liberals are the best choice for now. There's also a matter of people who will vote strategically.

Is it contradictory? The other poll says 44% think the Liberals are best to form government, after all.

That's a better number for the Republicans, lol.

Polling doesn't guarantee what happens during the election, if strategic voting takes place at all. I expect an election to not produce much different results than the last one.

Guys, I'm as left as they come, but this is EKOS, let's not get too ahead of ourselves.

Yeah, enough of this. It's possible to be smart about things without perpetually defaulting to the Liberals.

You realize the NDP lost a lot of seats that could've given them more of a foothold in Parliament because of the Liberals voting blindly in places where they were behind the NDP, right? London-Fanshawe is a good example.

To be clear, if you look at the last Abacus poll, this isn't a new result, the Libs were also down 1 to the Cons a few weeks ago too. Only difference here is the NDP is up one compared to then, which is good.

Isn't this the same as the last poll? You can see it if you scroll down.

Is it weird I kinda want another election now? The Liberals will almost certainly maintain the lead, while the NDP will likely up their seat count to 12 or more so they can get lots more crucial funding. That sounds ideal to me.

Worth noting that even neutral or disagree doesn't mean unconditionally wanting to be American. And with things going the way they are there, I bet that even stronger majorities than this wouldn't want to join them.

It just goes to show that the polls for the parties are reflecting left-wing discontent with Carney, not because the Cons look particularly good. That can be worked with.

This isn't so bad, no? Basically the same thing as their last poll, with only the Liberals losing since the election, not the Conservatives gaining. This is good to keep the feds on their toes.

Is worth noting that multiple of those categories could be traced to Trump's actions.

That's not really a split when you consider the huge combined bump for the NDP and Greens. Probably better to assume the absurd Liberal lead in the immediate election aftermath were just honeymoon numbers.