It definitely helps, but I think it's also simply that most scientists have a LinkedIn account and occasionally check it, whereas still only a minority has a bluesky account.
31.01.2026 19:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@const-ae.bsky.social
Postdoc at UCL with James Reading. Previously at EMBL working with Wolfgang Huber. Biostats, R, cancer immunology
It definitely helps, but I think it's also simply that most scientists have a LinkedIn account and occasionally check it, whereas still only a minority has a bluesky account.
31.01.2026 19:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, the amount of engagement on LinkedIn compared to bluesky is crazy. I recently posted about a new paper and it got 480 likes on LinkedIn vs 7 on bluesky (and I have more followers here than there...) :/
31.01.2026 11:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We wrote a review of representation learning methods of single-cell RNA-seq data, where we compare factor models, autoencoders, contrastive learning, and foundation models π
rnajournal.cshlp.org/content/earl...
Boeva Lab is #hiring postdocs and senior scientists in AI/ML for Cancer Biology! Check the offer and apply at: jobs.ethz.ch/job/view/JOP...
20.01.2026 14:49 β π 8 π 8 π¬ 0 π 0View from the hotel room
Poster session 2024, with Valentina Boeva, Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze and others
Wednesday afternoon hike incl. swim in the mountain river
Another view from the hotel room
Apply for the Ascona workshop "Statistical and AI methods for multi-modal multi-scale modeling of biological systems", 28 Jun-3 Jul 2026 on Monte VeritΓ , Lago Maggiore at the foot of the Swiss Alps.
ascona2026.sciencesconf.org
Save the date: April 9 from 4pm to 6pm CET. Our department is hosting an online seminar with @noeliaferruz.bsky.social @sdomcke.bsky.social @const-ae.bsky.social who will talk about models for protein design, large-scale perturbation screens, and benchmarking of perturbation prediction models.
14.01.2026 13:26 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Join me in 5.5h, when we discuss our benchmark of perturbation prediction models and what the right metric is to assess if a gene expression prediction is good!
02.12.2025 14:20 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π Excited to share our new preprint: msBayesImpute - A Versatile Framework for Addressing Missing Values in Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Data
π Improves imputation accuracy, normalization, and differential expression detection
πhttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.02.679746v1
Heads up: ignore samtools dot org, similarly minimap2 dot com and likely others. It's owned by a known phishing site and while the binaries they offer look valid currently (but note they may be serving us different binaries to others), that could change.
Ie: it's not us (Samtools team)! Be warned
We're excited to share that our preprint on anndataR, a new package bringing Python's AnnData to R, is now available on bioRxiv π
π Read the paper: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
π» Check the package in action: anndatar.data-intuitive.com
An arrow with a LaTeX equation
Trigonometric functions and a unit circle
A bivariate change model with structured residuals
A hierarchical model of cognitive abilities
Now on CRAN, ggdiagram is a #ggplot2 extension that draws diagrams programmatically in #Rstats. Allows for precise control in how objects, labels, and equations are placed in relation to each other.
wjschne.github.io/ggdiagram/ar...
Makes sense. I imagine this would simply be my primary use case, and I would prefer not having to refer to `x` twice. Something like:
replace_values <- function(x, ..., from=NULL, to=NULL, lookup=NULL){
if(! is.null(lookup)){
from <- names(lookup)
to <- lookup
}
...
}
This looks great! I think it would be neat if the functions also supported named look-up vectors in addition to the `to` and `from` arguments :)
10.08.2025 09:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Beeswarm plot of the prediction error across different methods of double perturbations showing that all methods (scGPT, scFoundation, UCE, scBERT, Geneformer, GEARS, and CPA) perform worse than the additive baseline.
Line plot of the true positive rate against the false discovery proportion showing that none of the methods is better at finding non additive interactions than simply predicting no change.
Our paper benchmarking foundation models for perturbation effect prediction is finally published ππ₯³π
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
We show that none of the available* models outperform simple linear baselines. Since the original preprint, we added more methods, metrics, and prettier figures!
π§΅
π¨ PhD Position available in our lab π¨ exploring the power of blood immune multi-omics to detect lung cancer years prior to clinical diagnosis in a unique cohort of >10,000 CT screened individuals.
β
Wet & dry lab
β
September 2025 enrolment
β
UK tuition fees only
www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-scie...
I wrote about AI foundation models for biology last year: www.nytimes.com/2024/03/10/s... Benchmarking tests since then aren't finding that they're better than simpler models of how genes and cells work.
04.08.2025 16:45 β π 38 π 13 π¬ 1 π 0An analysis shows that current deep learning models do not beat linear baselines in predicting gene perturbation effects, thus emphasizing the importance of further method development and evaluation. @const-ae.bsky.social @wkhuber.bsky.social @s-anders.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Haha, would also be a succinct summary of most of my academic work π
04.08.2025 15:38 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And lastly, a big shout-out to @wkhuber.bsky.social and @s-anders.bsky.social!
Link to pdf: rdcu.be/ey7x0
- Li et al. doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.23.630036
- Chen Li et al. doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629581
- Wong et al. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf317
And probably many more that I am missing here.
- @kasparmartens.bsky.social et al. openreview.net/forum?id=eb3ndUlkt4
- Gaudelet et al. doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.16907
- @aaronwtr.bsky.social et al. openreview.net/forum?id=t04D9bkKUq
- Bendidi et al. doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.13956
- Wu et al. doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.10609
I also encourage everyone to checkout the parallel efforts by groups around the world who came to similar conclusions:
- @ekernf01.bsky.social et al. doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.28.551039
- Csendes et al. doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11600-2
- @kasia.codes et al. doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03574-x
*We benchmarked scGPT, scFoundation, GEARS, CPA (which claim predictive ability), and scBERT, Geneformer, and UCE (which do not claim this ability). I can't comment on methods released in the last 5 months. For a summary of recent developments, see @ekernf01.bsky.social's post
04.08.2025 13:52 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Beeswarm plot of the prediction error across different methods of double perturbations showing that all methods (scGPT, scFoundation, UCE, scBERT, Geneformer, GEARS, and CPA) perform worse than the additive baseline.
Line plot of the true positive rate against the false discovery proportion showing that none of the methods is better at finding non additive interactions than simply predicting no change.
Our paper benchmarking foundation models for perturbation effect prediction is finally published ππ₯³π
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
We show that none of the available* models outperform simple linear baselines. Since the original preprint, we added more methods, metrics, and prettier figures!
π§΅
In October 2024, I twote that "something is deeply wrong" with what we now call virtual cell models. A lot has happened since then. How am I updating? New blog post: ekernf01.github.io/virtual-cell...
27.07.2025 23:48 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0That's amazing. Congratulations π
03.07.2025 08:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Going from methods dev to full on cancer bio has been tough. All the more excited to see this out at lastβ
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
@pascual-reguant.bsky.social
@brukerspatial.bsky.social
@hoheyn.bsky.social
With {tidylog}, you see friendly messages like: summarise: now 3 rows and 3 columns, ungrouped filter: removed 2 rows (67%), one row remaining
With {tidylog}, you see friendly messages like:
summarise: now 3 rows and 3 columns, ungrouped
filter: removed 2 rows (67%), one row remaining
β¨ Itβs like having a gentle co-pilot, helping you track what each step is doing β super useful for debugging and learning!
Spatialproteomics orchestrates workflows to analyze highly multiplexed images. It segments cells, processes images, quantifies proteins, predicts cell types, and provides neighborhood analysis methods, all while integrating into the scverse ecosystem.
New preprint out!
We introduce π¬π©πππ’ππ₯π©π«π¨πππ¨π¦π’ππ¬, a Python package for end-to-end processing and analysis of highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging data.
Built on xarray and dask, with seamless integration into the scverse ecosystem.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
(2/3)
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze showcased impressive work on assembling an atlas of T cells in precancerous samples. They developed the R packages treelabel and Shinytreelabel, which showed GITR+ Tregs are enriched in several precancerous samples, suggesting avenues for future treatments