Fair enough.
30.10.2025 18:11 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@sinurata.bsky.social
Loves: cats, politics, music, GOOD chocolate. Do not think that giving me chocolate kittens as a gift is in any way acceptable. especially if they are made of inferior chocolate. That's about it really.
Fair enough.
30.10.2025 18:11 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Clearly no one commenting below actually bothered to read the fucking article. In which the ambassador literally contradicts the headline. Jesus wept, this is so poor.
30.10.2025 18:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is LITERALLY contradicted within the actual article.
30.10.2025 18:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"The ambassador Pedro Serrano is said by the Guardianโs sources to have...warned [the environment secretary]that the planning and infrastructure bill going through the House of Lords could jeopardise the trade deal. However, the ambassador responded that he had made no such comment". FOR FUCKS SAKE.
30.10.2025 18:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Time for what? what are they going to do?
30.10.2025 18:01 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maternity and paternity pay must improve.
Parents shouldnโt have to choose between bonding with their baby and paying the bills.
They shouldn't be ground down by poverty or rushed back to work.
Properly supporting families with their first steps is an investment in our future.
I don't disagree with anything you say. But I think the point of the article was to show what spending cuts would look like in reality - it is aimed at those who glibly say that spending cuts are "easy", because all you have to do is "cut waste" or "DEI initiatives".
30.10.2025 14:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Did you not see the figures for the Greens?
30.10.2025 14:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Mail won't tell you that.
30.10.2025 14:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What that makes very clear is that if you want to cut welfare spending, you have to start cutting benefits to pensioners. As they make up 70% of all welfare spending. If you don't, then the burden of any cuts falls disproportionately on the other 30% - the poor, the disabled, children. The Daily
30.10.2025 14:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No, you haven't read it. The point it is making is that in the real world spending cuts are very hard to make - unless you are prepared to be incredibly unpopular.
30.10.2025 14:12 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0He is a chaos merchant. People like him thrive on upheaval. And of course he thinks he is immune from violence himself.
30.10.2025 13:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes, you've made your view clear. So let's just see, shall we?
30.10.2025 13:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Another major defence contract for the UK from a NATO ally.
This time with Tรผrkiye buying 20 Typhoon jets - the biggest fighter jet deal in a generation, worth up to ยฃ8bn &supporting thousands of jobs across the UK.
It follows a major contract win with Norway for firgates &other smaller projects.
Starmer on Sarah Pochinโs comments:
"Itโs shocking racism and itโs the sort of thing thatโll tear our country apart. And tells you everything about Reform. Nigel Farage either doesnโt consider it racist which I think is shocking in itself or he does and shows absolutely no leadership.โ
Farage says:
That is nonsense. It is a worrying proportion, but far from "pretty much every young man".
26.10.2025 19:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Notice she doesn't mention that one of the reasons trust in policing has collapsed is because we are constantly finding out how utterly racist and misogynistic large sections of our police force are....
26.10.2025 19:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's antisemitic to insist they...actually cease firing.
26.10.2025 19:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0That was the narrative - but actually it was the economy starting to improve that really turned things around.
26.10.2025 18:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Great keeper and a tight defence. I would like to see our midfield more creative - but again that should come.
26.10.2025 18:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I have a stocks and shares ISA. It's done far better than sticking the money in a savings account (apart from a blip in the Truss period).
25.10.2025 18:26 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What do you think left wing issues are?
25.10.2025 18:16 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Could someone please tell the CPRE?
25.10.2025 18:09 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Hard left? are you fucking insane????
25.10.2025 17:58 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What an incredibly depressing person you are.
25.10.2025 17:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I know someone who was an employee of his at the DPP - they said he was a brilliant boss. It's clearly there - not sure why he won't use it as PM.
25.10.2025 17:36 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yeah, I saw it just the other day.
25.10.2025 17:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It was the right decision to means test it. As you say, the fault was setting the qualifying amount too low. But its far more cost-effective and efficient to use an existing means test (in this case Pension Credit) as your benchmark rather than inventing a new one.
24.10.2025 18:32 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Honestly, all of this makes the government's original decision not to hold yet another enquiry into this subject seem like the right one.
24.10.2025 18:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I wish to god someone would show this to the CPRE
24.10.2025 18:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0