@danehoffman.bsky.social
Fascism was a bipartisan project. If the Democrats REALLY didn’t want fascism, their actions would have reflected that.
31.10.2025 16:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Democrats are controlled opposition
11.10.2025 03:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Republican politicians be like
10.09.2025 06:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We are so far past the point of anyone “suggesting” anything to Netanyahu
10.09.2025 06:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0She probably just thinks it’s Swedish or something
10.09.2025 06:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🗣️ Phallophotaijits 🗣️
10.09.2025 06:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What kind of idiot mines bitcoin in the year of our lord 2025
25.07.2025 03:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The fact that they thought Epstein’s best bud was going to save the world from pedophilia is the height of irony
11.07.2025 19:46 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0hard to do that when you didn’t win custody lol
13.06.2025 03:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
😂
12.06.2025 23:25 — 👍 12541 🔁 1906 💬 160 📌 53Rightoids aren’t real people
11.06.2025 02:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
11.06.2025 02:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Establishment Dems should be set adrift at sea
09.06.2025 06:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0just a bitchy way of saying you’re popular lol
16.05.2025 21:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think she’s looking down at her phone
16.05.2025 21:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Democrat Party needs to fucking go
10.05.2025 18:35 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The pro-natalist’s curse
10.05.2025 18:32 — 👍 22 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Even his digital son hates him
10.05.2025 18:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You don’t know my boy zippo?
So uncultured 😤
Floating point errors: “Allow us to introduce ourselves”
01.05.2025 03:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree.
30.04.2025 18:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0They are good for programming. Particularly, code analysis, documentation generation, documentation review, conceptual questions, unit test generation, boilerplate code generation, comment generation, and full-line autocomplete.
30.04.2025 17:10 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0These people are controlled opposition.
30.04.2025 17:04 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It converts each word into a numerical token. It doesn’t process each letter.
30.04.2025 17:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Eugenicists are on the prowl once again
30.04.2025 16:58 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0There is no technology you can (or should) rely 100% on.
30.04.2025 16:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Because LLMs are large LANGUAGE models. They are not designed to take a numerical input or perform numerical calculations.
They take an input sentence, turn each complete word into a numerical token, and do matrix multiplication on those numbers using pre-trained weights.
It’s not a calculator.
Because LLMs used tokenized complete words as an input. They aren’t meant to take a numerical input nor perform numerical calculations.
30.04.2025 16:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Google will blatantly mislead you sometimes too, doesn’t mean it’s a useless technology.
Part of tech literacy is being able to think critically about the information you receive, wherever it comes from. No source is worth blindly trusting.
Code is logic and word signifiers, not numerical calculations. The whole point of an LLM is that it converts complete words into numerical tokens. It’s not a calculator.
And LLMs aren’t useful for programming? Guess that’s news to every programmer then. That’s THE thing they’re most useful for.
