It’s why I got on twitter then here - to try and promote visibility of my own science and more often others work I really liked
05.08.2025 09:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@jeffmold.bsky.social
American/Swedish Biomedical Scientist studying immunology and cancer. My favorite cell atlases say “here be dragons” on the UMAPs. @karolinska institute https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=_owb98cAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate
It’s why I got on twitter then here - to try and promote visibility of my own science and more often others work I really liked
05.08.2025 09:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Visibility. I think at the end of the day that’s what everyone I know cares most about. That’s the power of the profit journals. People read and share them. They are good at marketing
05.08.2025 09:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What’s the best generalist non-profit? Does Science count?
05.08.2025 07:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0If I could change one thing about #ScientificPublishing I'd ask funding bodies to stipulate all work they fund be published in non-profit journals.
The knock-on effects would alleviate most of the strain on #AcademicSky.
This isn't hard. It's big, but actually, it's pretty easy.
1/n
I wish profit journals would turn into places which only published very good overviews/reviews of the most interesting trends in science highlighting preprints and providing a historical perspective
05.08.2025 06:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think it takes incredible talent to get to a place where some luck comes into play… think of tom Brady. He may not be tom Brady if not for ending up on the patriots and the starting qb getting hurt at the right time. But he is immensely talented
04.08.2025 14:26 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🤣 I see why it’s hard to digest
02.08.2025 17:47 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0One of the best English sentences ever written - anybody got others?
02.08.2025 17:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0For a transitory, enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder”
02.08.2025 17:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is human testes stained with an antibody of unknown specificity hence my question. Are there neurons that live here?
02.08.2025 08:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What sorts of largeish cells live in between the semineferous tubules at about 1-10% frequency like this:
02.08.2025 07:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Love this lab’s work www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
31.07.2025 20:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Even better one: m.youtube.com/watch?v=pgVs...
29.07.2025 08:08 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0This looks like a fascinating study (and well done) www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
29.07.2025 07:51 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0It’s cause people don’t read the papers. They read the abstract or just the title. It’ll get worse with AI
27.07.2025 09:13 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hence why fetal cd4s produce abnormal tnf. Who knows why…
26.07.2025 12:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0*fetal
26.07.2025 11:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0My take home from reading this is the same as my old paper - feral and adult T cells are fundamentally different and comparing individual features is difficult.. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21164017/
26.07.2025 11:58 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0The notion that fetal treg express less foxp3 or cd25 or that there are substantial numbers of non-treg effector/memory cells in fetal tissues certainly is at odds with what we saw in our previous work. Maybe tissue specific differences. I’d like to see a cd4 vs foxp3 stain scatterplot here
26.07.2025 10:52 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0For example see the overview of the data: what is the odd population only seen in fetal cd4?! (My guess fetal tregs). And there’s barely any signs of effectors/memory
26.07.2025 10:32 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’m not a big fan of mass spectrometry results shown as heatmaps and UMAPs. I think lots of cytof data I’ve seen (and generated) have difficult to interpret differences between positive and negative signals but maybe that’s just me…. But beware the dead cells in fetal cultures…
26.07.2025 10:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The reason why naive T cell activation by alloantigen leads to a large treg expansion is partly because we saw the tregs had a survival advantage over the non treg. We also found the fetal treg were highly stable and very good at dividing in vitro with IL2.
26.07.2025 10:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is a bit of weird analysis - and looking through it I don’t necessarily recall seeing the same stuff. Fetal effector T cells are prone to death in vitro and there are relatively few in vivo. Most are treg (foxp3+) www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
26.07.2025 10:08 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0One of the best lecturers and most creative thinkers I’ve encountered on this earth. I love her explanation of prion biology
26.07.2025 09:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I generally like anything these folks do - but it usually takes me a week to digest it. This one looks really nice too. And lung cancer to boot.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
My grandfather was one of the scientists in charge of identifying carcinogens in tobacco smoke in the 1960s and 70s in the employ of cigarette companies… www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Ja...
24.07.2025 07:51 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0There’s an incredible story about that in the later part of this book: www.audible.co.uk/pd/B00PR0ERU...
24.07.2025 07:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0How has the data held up on tobacco carcinogens as adducts that induce hotspot mutations? I’ve always thought the larger culprit was general cellular stress caused by generic rather than specific damage from smoking
24.07.2025 07:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0