I’m sure they’ll say, “but they say it’s ‘just’ nuisance flooding”.
06.10.2025 00:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@billcapehart.bsky.social
Climate scientist, meteorologist, resiliency, legos, snark, cats, horrible person, South Dakota Mines prof. All opinions are mine, but I'll blame my employers for my typos.
I’m sure they’ll say, “but they say it’s ‘just’ nuisance flooding”.
06.10.2025 00:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is part of the reason U. Nebraska is in trouble now.
03.10.2025 11:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Cutting tuition means removing credit generation for science programs. This isn’t encouraging science majors. It’s to destroy the science departments.
03.10.2025 06:13 — 👍 15 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0Waiving tuition without a compensating income stream worked brilliantly for Nebraska. This will gut the STEM programs they pretend to want to support. Pretty sure that’s a feature not a bug.
03.10.2025 06:10 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0And the empty spaces from where the books we loaned to our students would be.
02.10.2025 12:55 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“The Obama Shutdown.”
02.10.2025 12:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think we all know he doesn't believe in Jesus or his teaching.
01.10.2025 14:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah but he also thinks Kings Island’s parking lot is big. Applebaum’s size reference as OP was apt in this context. I’d dare even call them “plucky” given their adversary.
29.09.2025 12:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Compared to the size of the country that’s occupying part of its territory and just tried to take it over by ballot box, I’d say the adjective fits in this case.
29.09.2025 12:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well it IS an ugly car.
28.09.2025 17:08 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0“Nonstationarity of mean and extreme weather events” it is, then.
28.09.2025 16:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wrong football but … lightning WOULD be cool.
28.09.2025 02:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“For what it’s worth…”
“Just saying….”
I didnt think I remembered that line, thanks!
24.09.2025 01:07 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yup. CJ woulf have said it better, anyway. Jeeze why do people believe everything on the internet.
24.09.2025 01:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not from Downbellow Station. Check before you tweet.
24.09.2025 01:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nope. Not in Downbelow Station.
24.09.2025 01:01 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Back then blue backgrounds were a big thing, IIRC. But the letter colors were just awful along with the seisure inducing blinky blinky flashy flashy whooshy whooshies. It was like "ooo this is NEW! I will try everything on it!" I had to walk out of the room.
23.09.2025 21:26 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0OK now you got me started: This is a REAL slide set from an old COMET workshop on hydromet @ NCAR (NOT MINE!!) circa the late 90s when Powerpoint was new.
I'm not sure why but the "typewriter leter-by-letter" feature isn't on one of the slides. And yes, it made the clackity clack noise.
Samizdat is now available!
23.09.2025 20:19 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Opening slides of a presentation we do that drives home the message that your "graph is fugly, and everyone hates you."
Yup... Every program needs a presentation for that.
23.09.2025 20:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also do people really understand the power of an atom bomb? It’s a sexy shock and awe analogy but it doesn’t really provide grounding. Perhaps we should link “Big-Joule” to a known iconic volcanic eruption (not a picnic for people who have been adversely impacted by those either).
23.09.2025 14:37 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well gossip IS much more fun than doing a lit review.
23.09.2025 09:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Jimmy showed us how to diagram a sentence and we realized we had no legal foot to stand on.
22.09.2025 20:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So they;re taking the Sirius XM route? #IYKYK
21.09.2025 22:13 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Come and play with us!
South Dakota Mines Department of Civil & Envir. Engineering is seeking a tenure-track faculty member for our program’s Environmental Engineering leg. We don't do silos, empires or boundaries; just lots of surprising avenues to collaborate!
yourfuture.sdbor.edu/postings/45345
That's right. What's more alarming is ~97% of the current highway storm drains in the United States were designed using rainfall information that was published in *1961* using 1930s-1950s data. We're using infrastructure built for the rainfall of nearly a century ago. engrxiv.org/preprint/vie....
21.09.2025 15:53 — 👍 214 🔁 69 💬 5 📌 5Just link to the DoD press release page in the margin. Starve him of attention.
20.09.2025 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“97% to be precise.”
20.09.2025 12:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0HUNDREDS of dollars?!?! You oligarch, you.
19.09.2025 18:34 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0