jas/virgil

Didn't think I'd find myself supporting the BBC so soon but enemy of my enemy always seems to ring true

i dont play my games with spreadsheets, i use SIGNS and HEADACHES like GOD INTENDED

#satisfactory

6, or 260 if you read it quickly

so uh that’s the end of the midterms, then

Between that and the "My party! No, My party!" conference I might run out of popcorn.

i saw someone spam liked my posts but its a fucking ai bro disgusting

Every now and then the govt has an amazing idea and proceeds to do the worst possible execution ever.

Other times it's just a shit idea.

lost airport roulette again

ai is bringing us into a new era of "horrible person does thing, what happens next will shock you" titles

I almost feel sorry to say I called it.

Is America about to learn how a split vote works?

who is eddy and why does everyone hate his son

The only Ice I know is water at a temperature below 0°.

Anything else that calls itself ice is a cheap copy and should be treated as such.

We don't need One Big Beautiful Bill, we need One Big Beautiful Bullet.

I said what I said.

is constantly yapping about recession indicators a recession indicator????????

jetlag vatican edition

it would last exactly two seconds but i need it

update i was way off.

dont do gambling kids

playing airport roulette: guessing which gate my plane is at and heading over there before it's announced

I've had a OMEN 15 laptop for years and it works like a dream.

That being said, it took so many hours to get there I wouldn't recommend anyone go through that pain.

that being said it's not exactly a difficult guess

proud to be one of the five and not tell you which one it is

He then proceeded to go to the Cambridge center for Computing History and make a video about why you shouldn't do that.

280 characters isn't remotely close to what I would need to give a decent response, because you seem to have forgotten what your own thread says.

Also slightly unusual to restrict scrutinising Government policy to those who have access to confidential Treasury documents, i.e. those in Government.

It hasn't been able to specifically because of the money that was spent by other countries.

You're supporting stopping that flow of money. If the front lines don't receive funding, the front lines will be overrun.

Not entirely sure how else I can get you to grasp that.

If Ukraine falls, the rest of Europe will be the next target. NATO does not have the resources to push back a Russian invasion if America doesn't involve itself.

That's not a government lie, it's basic mathematics.

Labour has access to internal treasury numbers and calculators, you tell me.

My question was related to your statement earlier.

Given what we've discussed, if someone complains that Labour is sacrificing public services for Ukraine, are they right?

I'd start by clamping down on the thousands of shell corporations in and around London, and addressing the billions of pounds annually that find their way into their pockets of the upper classes.

I'm no economist, though, so what do I know?

Also, I'd appreciate an answer. Don't dodge questions.

So next time someone complains LAB is funding Ukraine instead of public services, they're..... right?

"LAB isn't sacrificing public service money, they're taking it from a fund used to fight climate change and improve public services"

Remind me, what was the point of making that thread?

So is climate and social spending being sacrificed for the war in Ukraine or not?

I fully support Ukrainian sovereignty etc etc etc -- the issue with with the inconsistency in your messaging.

That's exactly what's happening though, no? You said the NWF was previously set aside for climate funds and reinvesting into UK economic growth.

The scope was then expanded to include defense funding.

Or did I misread?