Adverb

Obligatory: there is great journalism. But it's not so common

Another fine day of scrolling on the Will Stancil And AI App

Millennia of virtue ethics vindicated

At the risk of moving into the discourse a 2nd time today, the fact that a lot of Americans in the replies see this as a bit of fun trash talk between rivals kind of illustrates the extent to which maybe a lot of Americans aren't reading the room in how they are viewed internationally at this point

Easier to ignore people who're mostly asking for your exact skull measurements

Then ask a domain expert for their thoughts on reporting in their domain. I dare ya!

To avoid being Too Much: consider for even just a second the entire incentives structure of journalism in 2026.

Defending X is wild. Do you read Musk’s posts? He has turned it into the most important platform for building a far right international.

Yeah these,,, journalists are, incredibly serious111!!!11

Lmfao fucking hilarious

Yeah, archive dot org & common crawl with a handful of ML resources could do this. Honestly might have to hit up Brewster.

Polymarket on the parameter count of google's dogass search llm when?

Rent-Only Copyright Culture Makes Us All Worse Off In the Netflix/Spotify/Amazon era, many of us access copyrighted works purely in digital form – and that means we rarely have the chance to buy them. Instead, we are stuck renting them, subject to

Buying a track or ebook that you can’t pass on, share, or transfer isn’t ownership; it’s a rental. We need to restore digital first sale. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...

Presumably so people can boomer search "what was the name of that movie about the cowboy who sings? Thanks!"

It is 100% using a shit-tier sub-4b model (probably even just millions of params) to rephrase queries that ends up dropping any useful keywords.

It's unusable at this point. Moving to using ChatGPT. Congrats goog

If the BBC can suggest even one possible logical reason for spraying high concentration glyphosate, classified as a category 2A carcinogen BTW, which isn’t to destroy crops, harm the health of civilians, or both, then let them do so. Otherwise to say “we don’t know” is journalistic malpractice.

I adore text-to-image obviously & think it can be an important part of workflows even outside of the love of text-image art.

But so many cases of interfaces that spotlight sycophantic hell conversation that should be avoided

Basically we don't need to uninvent the mouse

Defaulting to a back-and-forth with literal clippy is such a silly fucking choice -- fwiw I think natural language intetfaces can be good but "chat" interfaces are sooo often misapplied

*In many contexts

The people yearn for anything but chat interfaces

they're saturating my benchmarks tomorrow

i hope so if only for their sake lol

had to bail when i scrolled to find the thesis and hit an "it is programmed to" with reference to ChatGPT

video on "AI isn’t merely bad at writing. It does not and cannot write"

Writing isn't just producing written words: it requires redefining terms to have zero face validity so someone will click your thumbnail.

I still think a lot about “trad cisgender ai chips”

Yeah, should be made an official human rights violation. Would love to have some sort of disbarring for people who do work on this

Seems important for AI folks to be clear that they don’t support this