A propos of nothing, I canβt rule out that my childhood vaccines caused my love of causal inference
20.11.2025 21:54 β π 31 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0@drjenndowd.bsky.social
Prof of Demography & Population Health @oxforddemsci.bsky.social | Mortality, Epidemiology, Infections/Immunity, Biosocial science, COVID-19. | Science Communicator πΊπΈ in π¬π§. Substack: https://jenndowd.substack.com
A propos of nothing, I canβt rule out that my childhood vaccines caused my love of causal inference
20.11.2025 21:54 β π 31 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0The worldβs most studied half a million humans humans β¦ just got measured in yet another clever way β¦ looking forward to diving into the data
20.11.2025 13:59 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 0 π 1give me the quadrivalent mRNA flu vaccine right now. put it in me
19.11.2025 22:49 β π 488 π 81 π¬ 8 π 3Experimental mRNA flu vaccine is more effective than conventional flu shot, but causes more side effects
In a phase 3 trial, participants who received the shot were 29% less likely to be diagnosed with flu than those who received a conventional flu shot.
www.cidrap.umn.edu/i...
Our latest blog: @anne-mcmunn.bsky.social, Professor of Social Epidemiology at UCL, sets out the evidence on how unpaid work can affect health and inequality through its effect on employment
19.11.2025 11:12 β π 5 π 4 π¬ 0 π 0Wow, you've got to admire the commitment/stubbornness
19.11.2025 16:46 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0π«£
19.11.2025 11:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Apply now to our next Summer School! π€
We are glad to host the Toulouse Summer School in Quantitative Social Sciences from 26 May to 19 June 2026 β a great opportunity for PhD students in economics, political science, and other social sciences.
Application: www.tse-fr.eu/toulouse-sum...
Our new paper develops and tests a network-based method for estimating death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies.
Joint w/ @dennisfeehan.bsky.social and team from Geneva-based NGO @impact-initiatives.bsky.social
academic.oup.com/aje/advance-...
29/ Also keep an eye out for new work by @philipncohen.com who is working on a book on this topic: familyinequality.wordpress.com/2024/05/02/f...
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 028/ A great recent podcast with @karenguzzo.bsky.social www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2... #demography #population @uncpopcenter.bsky.social @popassocamerica.bsky.social
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 027/ contemporaryfamilies.utah.edu/publications... #demography @popassocamerica.bsky.social
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 026/ Some additional links: contemporaryfamilies.utah.edu/publications... #demography @popassocamerica.bsky.social
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 025/ And for more on concerns over falling birthrates, follow some great demographers @karenguzzo.bsky.social @lesja.bsky.social @amandajean.bsky.social @shelleydclark.bsky.social @alisongemmill.bsky.social @lauralindberg.bsky.social @srhayford.bsky.social
theconversation.com/fears-that-f...
24/ For more demography & population health content, please consider subscribing to my Substack newsletter!
jenndowd.substack.com/p/what-is-re... #demography
23/If someone figures out how to make such a bet happen (a la Simon & Ehrlich), let me know. Until then, I recommend investing as much as you can for the people in the world today, & not losing too much sleep over whether this yearβs fertility rate is above or below a (somewhat) arbitrary threshold.
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 022/ #Demography is fun like that-the βstableβ populations of the textbooks are rarely seen IRL. While I won't predict how humans will plan their familes hundreds of years from now, I would bet that itβs not going to follow a trend straight down to zero. (Whatβs going on with this x-axis anyway?)
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 021/ We donβt have a crystal ball, but projections that global population will peak later this century are certainly feasible. But what happens next will take *hundreds* of years to play out, regardless of whether fertility rates today are above or below βreplacement.β #demography
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 020/ Today we are less worried about a world with humans stacked upon humans. But we should also be skeptical of projections of population collapse that assume equally unlikely math continuing forever. #demography
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 019/ "If growth continued at that rate for about 900 years, there would be some 60,000,000,000,000,000 people on the face of the earth. Sixty million billion people. This is about 100 persons for each square yard of the Earthβs surface, land and sea..."
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 018/ In his (in) famous the Population Bomb, Paul Ehrlich described what might happen under the βabsurdβ assumption that human population continued at its pace in the 1960s....
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 017/Overall it's important to keep in mind that replacement fertility is a theoretical concept, not mathematical destiny. The number 2 (or 2.1) is not a magic tipping point that sends us straight to population collapse, any more than fertility rates higher than 2 led us to infinite population growth.
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 016/ Keeping our young people alive & healthy so they have the chance to become parents if they so choose should be one βpro-natalistβ policy we can all agree on.
#demography #mortality
15/ My brilliant collaborators @andreatilstra.bsky.social & @polizzan.bsky.social estimated that 200K babies were NOT born between 2010-19 because their potential mothers died compared to if the US had the mortality rates of peer countries. academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar... @pnasnexus.org
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 014/ Sadly, the US has higher mortality at younger ages (mostly due to drugs, accidents, and homicide) than other countries, so we lose more potential mothers & their children.
Figure: Female probability of survival to age 50 years in the United States and 21 other wealthy nations, 1950β2019.
13/ So a country that is technically βbelow replacementβ fertility can continue to grow not only by adding new people through immigration (which seems mathematically obvious), but by the added *momentum* of the babies those new residents will have (the real βbaby bonusesβ!).
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 012/ This "momentum" can be amplified through immigration, which tends to attract young adults, increasing the # of people in childbearing years. This means more total births, *even* if immigrants have a similar number of kids as the native-born pop (which is increasingly the case).
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 011/ Because of population momentum, fertility (& mortality) rates have to be stable across multiple generations for the elegant math of βreplacementβ fertility to actually kick in. Spoiler alert: that never happens. #demography
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 010/ Total births continue to grow, even as births rates go down. Population momentum keeps populations growing for decades beyond when fertility rates fall below βreplacementβ.
#demography
familyinequality.wordpress.com/2024/05/02/f... @philipncohen.com
9/ When a big generation (like the baby boom) grows up & becomes parents, birth numbers rise again even if the average family size stays the same. This βechoβ of previous growth isnβt about people having more kids, itβs about more people having kids. #demography
18.11.2025 15:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0