ceejayoz

lmao, kristi noem wanted a black bloc fight and got an inflatable rave instead. fuck you DHS, rip city forever.

Excerpt of Supreme Court transcript in Chiles v. Salazar: JUSTICE JACKSON: No, but here's what I mean, right? In Skrmetti, we had a state that wanted to prohibit certain medical treatment, gender-affirming care, being given to minors in the form of medication. And we said that was okay. And I understand there are particulars with respect to how the -- the arguments, the constitutional arguments, worked, but the state can prohibit that. Here, we have a state that wants to prohibit gender-related medical treatment in the form of talk therapy, but we now have the First Amendment that is inhibiting the state's ability to do that. And I'm just, from a very, very broad perspective, concerned about making sure that we have equivalence with respect to these things.

Supreme Court on banning gender-affirming care for trans youth: Sure, that's fine, no constitutional violation.

Supreme Court on banning so-called conversion therapy for gay youth: No, can't have that, grave constitutional violation.

Here, Ketanji Brown Jackson gets to the bottom of it:

Exclusive | A Devastating Fire at a Major Ford Supplier Will Disrupt Business for Months The Novelis plant supplies about 40% of aluminum sheet used in the auto industry.

"Ford is the biggest user of the plant. Its F-150 pickup, the top-selling vehicle in the U.S. and the automaker’s main profit driver, is one of the industry’s biggest users of aluminum."

www.wsj.com/business/aut...

"hand-to-hand combat with antifa every night"

If any other president said something like this in a speech to a military academy, it would be a massive scandal. Instead, it isn’t among the ten most dangerous things he’s done this week.

Trump only has criminal immunity if we honor Trump v. US, which we should not do.

We should tear up the Constitution before we accept that as law.

"Every synagogue in the world is a valid target unless they actively release a statement rejecting Israel to this person's liking" is the same logic of "Every Palestinian person is a potential terrorist unless they actively denounce Hamas."

BREAKING: A federal judge finds that there is evidence Kilmar Abrego was VINDICTIVELY PROSECUTED. The judge GRANTS Abrego's motion for discovery and a hearing, and the government must now PROVE it did not vindictively prosecute Mr. Abrego. 1/

Criticizing Charlie Kirk is a fireable offense that incites domestic terrorism. But calling political opponents "the party of hate, evil, and Satan" is proper and good. Got it.

Complaining about cancel culture in Riyadh is one of the best examples I've seen of how "free speech culture" rots the brain.

Capitulation isn’t going to win them over. Stop doing it.

it's so funny that Greenblatt bent over backwards to these people and annihilated his organization's credibility with anyone left of center to get absolutely nothing from the right

I’ve been in the ER dozens of times without ever knowing a single person’s immigration status.

Before: These Six Charts Tell You Exactly What’s at Stake in This Shutdown After: These 6 Charts Explain Why Democrats May Shut Down the Government

Change in Headline

A browser screenshot of the hud.gov website. A large, red banner stating "The radical left are going to shut down the government and inflict massive pain on the American people unless they get their $1.5 trillion wish of demands. The Trump administration wants to keep the government open for the American people." covers the screen.

So uh hud.gov looks like this today:

can you imagine sitting in that audience as a three-star flag officer — decades in the service, multiple post-grad degrees and a virtually unequaled level of command expertise — and being forced to watch this dunderheaded dry drunk give an off-brand jordan belfort seminar?

this is, no exaggeration, some of the most loser shit i have ever seen in my life

"Some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily kill civilians not directly taking part in hostilities, even if they are believed to be smuggling drugs."

hey @nytimes.com: there is no counterpoint here. There are no credible legal experts who would EVER say that the US military has any right or authority to blow civilian craft out of the Caribbean and kill their crews from afar without any provocation. There is no other side to this question.

"some legal experts have called it a crime to summarily execute civilians" says today's New York Times, continuing their long tradition of whitewashing fascism

Absolute all-timer sentence in today's @nytimes.com

Translation "I am a two day old baby"

this is why you can’t give an inch to transphobes. they are driven by hate and no amount of kindness will make them even momentarily soften. it is a militant ideology.

Abigail Jackson saying: Democrats, calling your political opponents Nazis has consequences. Study: Left-wing terrorism climbs to 30-year high And posting a graph from Axios that shows WAY WAY WAY more right wing terrorism, and showing a very slight increase in left wing terrorism this year that would still have it lower than basically every other year of right wing terrorism.

White House Deputy Press Secretary seen here posting data showing how much more prevalent right wing domestic terrorism is than left wing domestic terrorism... while thinking she's showing the reverse.

Apparently she can only read headlines, but not the actual graph with the data.

I mean yes this is funny, but the fact that these unconstitutional stormtroopers are so directionless that they literally stand around waiting for random nonwhite delivery guys to bike past them is just pathetic. No mandate, no mission, no clue. Just racism.

Local News Trump seems to back off Portland military plan: 'Am I watching things on television that are different from what's happening?'

I have been haunted by this statement all day www.kgw.com/article/news...

absolutely fucking insane to say any word of this. what is he doing

To be fair, it worked for Gandalf.

Troops. In an American city. Using full force.

Your now-regular reminder that Republican members of Congress are letting this happen.

For 26 but especially 2028 it's time for Democrats to make clear that the current Supreme Court will have to be reformed (expanded in number, reformed in structure) to allow popular govt to continue in the United States. Not so much a litmus test as precondition for any other promise to be credible.