Felix

The Implausible Girl 🔻 on Twitter “Hartford Courant, 1997-06-14 "Gay activists manipulate confused students" "homosexual activists are manipulating confused students to label themselves as gay or lesbian" "Vulnerable students must n...

The accusations of "indoctrination" aren't new either. Bindel is singing from a very old hymn sheet. web.archive.org/web/20220424...

Excerpt from Chilliwack Teachers' Association v. Neufeld (No. 10), 2026 BCHRT 49: > Calling transness "gender ideology" allows anti-trans activists to hide behind a veneer of reasonableness. It allows them to say ... that they are not attacking human beings. They are simply opposing a set of ideas. But behind this insidious veneer is the proposition that transness is not real. Such phrasing can make it easier to ignore that trans people are human beings. Referring to "gender ideology" or "transgenderism"—"-ism" denoting a belief or ideology such as capitalism or communism—pushes the idea that trans people have an agenda rather than being just another demographic group. As this decision illustrates, such terms can create the conditions for discrimination and hatred to flourish.

This seems relevant as a reply to Bindel's garbage. From www.bchrt.bc.ca/law-library/...

Does he think the current situation is workable??

What do you mean they're not available? What do you mean they've already played their part?

Quick, I'm assembling a team. Where can I find the Harper's Letter signers?

I’m in that thread and feel shit about participating in it. The only good thing to come out of it is that there several accounts to block.

See also: bsky.app/profile/ostr...

Absolutely contemptible.

In which case it's not clear how they can hold that against us and claim that we're failing to deliver an account that's acceptable by standards that they themselves appear more than happy to compromise on.

The only reason for setting the brakes there is that they believe it gets them the categories they want. But then they've already compromised on what was putatively an essential desideratum for any account they'd be willing to accept.

It's also worth noting: if they want to insist that an account has to be applicable to all "reproducing organisms," that that's a crucial theoretical desideratum for them, then it's not clear why they'd set the brakes at anisogamy at all. Not all reproducing organisms are anisogamous.

Ethel has a good thread on some of Emma's greatest hits: bsky.app/profile/lous...

Ethel has some of her greatest hits here: bsky.app/profile/lous...

Yeah, that was her. bsky.app/profile/2dam...

On Twitter, a few years ago, one of them compared cis women who were infertile to broken clocks. "It's still a clock, just one that is broken," they said, feministly.

applicable across all biology and to all reproducing organisms. That is straightforwardly false. But they still present it as though that's (a) a crucial theoretical desiderata for any account and (b) as though they've satisfied it.

not clear why they'd set the brakes at anisogamy at all. The only reason they set the brakes there is because they believe it gets them the categories they are after. And sure, that's one way of getting them, but it's absurd then for them to pretend that they have an account that is ...

It's interesting that they start with "in biology" and "reproducing organisms." Because that actually makes the rest of their claim false. Not all reproducing organisms are anisogamous. And if they want to insist that our accounts have to be applicable to all reproducing organisms, then it's ...

Peyton Farquhar (22 February 2026): > I guess that's because the reinvention of rape culture and male privilege as "a civil rights movement," by sticking in a dress, has happened within living memory of the last male-dominated society. > > Women's brush with political equality lasted only about fifty years. Now you have these abusers Available at https://bsky.app/profile/peytonfarquhar.bsky.social/post/3mff7qudlw22v

Screenshot.

Oh, he tried to remove it from the quote. Here it is: bsky.app/profile/peyt...

Own it you pos.

I mean, this is Science. Pronounixels. Pixnouns. Material Reality. Words.

Luckily for us We Can Always Tell is 100% stereotype-free. You might not see it, but there’s a couple of pixels in that image that show gametes. Yep, that’s right; adult human pixels.

gosh, how embarrassing would it be if GCism depended on stereotypes. Pretty embarrassing I’d say. bsky.app/profile/ostr...

Where and how matters on a narrow conception isn’t necessarily going to be the same as where and how it matters on a more expansive one.

You can’t just keep shifting between narrow and expansive conceptions as suits your argument. Those have different implications.

There’s a reason I linked to this! bsky.app/profile/ostr...

You also don’t have any reason to organise spaces based on gamete production. So if that’s the definition you want to stick with, you have your work cut out for you in establishing why that would be sensible in the contexts in which you re invoking it.

You don’t stick to that definition. Because the type of gamete produced might also be *none*, and yet you still want to be able to classify individuals who are not producing gametes.

Granted, it only puts you a little higher on the hierarchy, but at least you get to feel a little important. It helps compensate for things, don’t it?

I don’t know man, it seems like if someone craved that sort of privilege they’d try not to be part of a demonised gender minority and instead, you know, lick boot, like you do.

This guy postures as antifascist but calls trans folk “rape culture” (bsky.app/profile/peyt...). Beyond contemptible. These are fascist freaks.