theonion.com/what-to-know... Excellence.
26.10.2025 00:31 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0@mariambaksh.bsky.social
Journalist contemplating US artificial intelligence policy and life at large. RE “where are you from??” Long live the global south, @UFJSchool @IRWorkshop @TheProspect @Marketplace Signal: +1 650 679 1886
theonion.com/what-to-know... Excellence.
26.10.2025 00:31 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0posting in an effort to wrap my head around this as I only encountered it while covering AI nuggets in the defense authorization bill...Here's the vote www.senate.gov/legislative/...
11.09.2025 10:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0For those keeping track, Susan Collins of Maine also voted against the release of the files. The only [2] Republicans who voted for their release were men.
11.09.2025 10:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0On the left, the NYT valorizing Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski for standing up to Trump. On the right, a commenter on the blog of a local independent writer, a few days later when she cast the deciding vote to block release of the Epstein files.
11.09.2025 10:38 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Now it would be a righteous riot if the special session, which the tech industry pushed for, ended up resulting in a bill that is much stronger for consumers. The new Rodriguez proposal--the Sunshine bill--doesn't seem to have the loopholes and safe harbors of the CAIA.
22.08.2025 14:54 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Also, the disclosure requirements in the CAIA have carveouts that will allow companies to withhold anything they deem related to their "trade secrets" or "intellectual property" so it still kind of a gamble that consumers will get useful info, IMHO
22.08.2025 14:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Okay, but I'm pretty sure the current law that it would replace also takes away the private right of action and in addition has a huge liability shield for companies...https://www.levernews.com/lawmakers-backtrack-on-ais-get-out-of-jail-free-bill/
22.08.2025 14:41 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0This feels like a new low from Zuckerberg: www.reuters.com/investigates... The Wall Street Journal report from back in April has more details on how he pushed staffers to undo the related guardrails. Truly disgusting.
19.08.2025 15:59 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0will be interesting to see how much property owners under the restrictions of DOJ's settlement continue to rely, or not, on algorithmic price setting tools like RealPages'.
13.08.2025 15:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fun turns of phrase at the judiciary on AI and Copyright: "The death-knell doctrine" and the issue of "the rare changelings."
08.08.2025 19:08 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0AI appreciation day, now? Give me a break, JFC
09.07.2025 19:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0from my inbox this recess week, pls send help:
08.07.2025 19:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The potential deportation of the leading mayoral candidate for NYC is rightfully getting a lot of attention, but there are also stories like this one: abcnews.go.com/US/governmen...
02.07.2025 14:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nancy Mace is especially sickening here. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/26/u... The update of Hochul defending him against Trump is good at least...
02.07.2025 14:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nancy Mace is especially sickening.
02.07.2025 14:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That she hasn’t apologized for this is the wreckage of tribalism. www.theguardian.com/music/2025/j...
30.06.2025 11:46 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0full access link archive.is/ilyEU
27.06.2025 14:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Don't look away. Read every one of these soldiers' quotes. Understand the nature of what's happening here. #WarCrimes
www.haaretz.com/israel-news/...
🙌
25.06.2025 10:50 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Can confirm: my homemade hair mask--egg yolk, avocado, banana, coconut oil and honey--is delicious!
22.06.2025 16:43 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Guess what's good for the goose ISN'T for the gander?
21.06.2025 16:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Funny how when the conversation is about regulations the private sector describes the government as overly risk averse but then when it's about "public-private partnerships" and technology transfers, the government needs to help the private sector "de-risk" their investments with taxpayer dollars.
21.06.2025 16:39 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Our little station in Fort Reno Park today. No kings, dammnit.
14.06.2025 19:05 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0PS. It appears the judge who issued the order is no longer assigned to this case...not sure what that now means.
14.06.2025 16:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It is even suggested on information and belief that “the model underlying [Character Technologies’ LLM] was invented and initially built at Google.”
In short, what this mom is saying is: Google knew, Google knows.
Shortly thereafter, but WHILE STILL WORKING AT GOOGLE (my emphasis), the Individual Defendants began working on the startup that would become Character Technologies. (Id.).
14.06.2025 16:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That was from (Id. ¶¶ 57–60 (quoting Emily M. Bender, et al., On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: ... doi.org/10.1145/3442...). Still, Google “encouraged the Individual Defendants to stay at Google and to continue developing the technology underlying the LaMDA model.”
14.06.2025 16:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0...‘humans are prepared to interpret strings belonging to languages they speak as meaningful and corresponding to the communicative intent of some individual or group of individuals who have accountability for what is said.’”
14.06.2025 16:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Google employees raised concerns that users might “ascribe too much meaning to the text [output by LLMs], because ...
14.06.2025 16:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A US District Court judge ruled that Google must remain as a defendant. Below is some of the related portion of the decision, check out my highlight in caps...:
14.06.2025 16:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0