Matthew Schafer's Avatar

Matthew Schafer

@matthewschafer.bsky.social

Adjunct law prof Fordham Law; Scholar focusing on the intellectual history of press freedom: http://shorturl.at/bhsv7; rare book collector

5,432 Followers  |  765 Following  |  273 Posts  |  Joined: 01.07.2023  |  2.2459

Latest posts by matthewschafer.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image Post image Post image Post image

MAGA’s ongoing war on academic freedom, reflected in headlines from the last 24 hours.

14.11.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1743    πŸ” 707    πŸ’¬ 24    πŸ“Œ 50
08.11.2025 16:09 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Great First Amendment win in 9th Circuit for @davidloy.bsky.social and @facoalition.bsky.social. Holding: β€œself-censorship” is an β€œinjury-in-fact” for injunctive relief, and observation of events is β€œinextricably intertwined” with recording and reporting.

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

04.09.2025 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Bonus book! A beautiful 1797 copy of John Almon’s Biographical, Literary, & Political Anecdotes. The liberty minded printer included an early sketch of Benjamin Franklin β€” β€œfounder of American Greatness”.

Almon’s press was of singular importance in introducing the British to revolutionary thought.

02.09.2025 23:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is like how he dismisses the Statute of Northampton as too early to matter in the gun rights context but then relies on the statutes of scandalum magnatum from the same period as a basis to limit First Amendment speech rights...

02.09.2025 16:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No... he wouldn't be... inconsistent?!?!

02.09.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

I've read the just-issued 11th Circuit opinion in Dershowitz v CNN, I appreciate Judge Wilson bringing to bear a thoughtful defense of Sullivan and highlighting my scholarship as well as that of others in defense of a cornerstone of press freedom...

It's very gratifying seeing scholarship at work.

29.08.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

So while these books have seen better days, they are literally a part of US history. Tucker's Blackstone was a key resource for understanding how Americans viewed common law in the years following ratification. Masterly, Tucker adapted Blackstone's often anti-democratic work to a young republic.

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Breckenridge had already served as the floor leader for Jeffersonians in Congress. Now he was the chief law enforcement officer in the Country. But, his term was cut short when, in 1806, he contracted tuberculosis.

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Both it’s duties & it’s emoluments are too well known to you to render it necessary for me to particularize them. ... Hoping that in your patriotism, & perhaps in other circumstances you will find motives sufficient to induce you to become a part of our administration."

Breckenridge accepted.

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Years later, in 1805, Jefferson asked Breckinridge to serve as his attorney general, writing: "The office of Attorney General for the US. being not yet permanently filled, I have an opportunity of proposing it for your acceptance."

Jefferson added:

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

In Kentucky, Breckinridge made revisions and introduced the first resolutions. Importantly, he provided a means by which the States should seek repeal and removed language about nullification. In 1799, he shepherded the second set through too.

Despite this, some insisted it was Jefferson's doing.

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Breckinridge was the vehicle for the Resolutions opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts enacted by Congress to keep. He was a main character in a conspiracy hatched to keep Jefferson's involvement a secret, having agreed to get them passed and solemnly promising not to ID Jefferson.

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Rare Book Friday! Don't judge a book by its cover! A remarkably scarce 1803 set of Tucker's Blackstone, which redefined law and press freedom in America.

This set is especially rare because of its owner: John Breckinridge, Jefferson's Attorney General who was key to passing the Kentucky Resolutions

29.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Somehow class is back in session...

27.08.2025 23:58 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also not for nothing... Originalists are in search of original meaning at the Founding, meanwhile the Founders weren't really sure whether the Bill of Rights was a thing at the Founding until Jefferson finally did some math and said so in a letter about fish.

27.08.2025 13:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

In 1941, December 15 become BoR Day after Congress requested the FDR so recognize the day.

The first BoR Day was marked by a big production that occurred just a week after Pearl Harbor.

You can listen to the radio broadcast here: archive.org/details/Norm...

27.08.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

With Vermont, the number of states required went from 10 of 13 to 11 of 14.

Vermont ratified the Bill of Rights in November, becoming the 10th state. Virginia got its act together on Dec 15, 1791 and ratified, becoming the 11th.

In March 1792, TJ then sent the Fish Letter making the BoR official:

27.08.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

By August, only 9 states had ratified 10 of the 12 proposed amendments. Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State was keeping track with this handy chart.

He tracked the states North-to-South, and had to pencil in a "V" for Vermont, which became the 14th state while the BoR was under consideration.

27.08.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

When was the First Amendment ratified? Dec. 15, 1791, of course, when Virginia became the 11th of 14 states to do so (3/4ths of states)!

Well, things weren't so clear at the Founding. In this Sept. 1791 copy of the Bill of Rights, the editor said ratification occurred by August (it did not!).

27.08.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There is a lovely patriotic tradition in the colonial era of very angry grand jurors using their position to assert independence from the crown by returning "ignoramus" (essentially no true bill).

History, as they say, repeats itself...

26.08.2025 02:11 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Four journalists among 15 killed in Israeli strike on hospital in Gaza, say health officials Deaths take to at least 192 the number of Palestinian journalists killed in the conflict since 7 October 2023

It's already the deadliest war for journalists on record and keeps getting worse. www.theguardian.com/world/2025/a...

25.08.2025 11:41 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image Post image

Madison's report opposed the Alien and Sedition Acts. It was, 1826 edition said, a "landmark of the Constitution." Though liberty of the press had been invaded, "the Republicans did not abandon the cause of their Country" nor did they "despair."

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 22.08.2025 13:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Truly, a landmark of history, of Jefferson's death, of Lafayette, of Madison's views of press freedom, of a mutual commitment to a liberal revolution around the world.

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

The press in America, Madison wrote, "must be entitled to much more respect. In every State, probably, in the Union, the press has exerted a freedom in canvassing the merits and measures of public men of every description which has not been confined to the strict limits of the common law."

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

While revisionists say that the Report was about states' rights not press freedom, Madison's own words refute that idea. Madison's considers the question at length: "The state of the press under the common law, cannot, in this point of view, be the standard of its freedom in the United States."

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Madison's report opposed the Alien and Sedition Acts. It was, 1826 edition said, a "landmark of the Constitution." Though liberty of the press had been invaded, "the Republicans did not abandon the cause of their Country" nor did they "despair."

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

The report he enclosed was this edition, printed in Richmond in 1826, the same year he was writing Lafayette--which makes this particular edition all the more interesting.

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Madison obliged Lafayette's other request, for his report: "I inclose a Copy of the Report you ask for. I should have sent you one long ago, but a copy was not to be had. It has just been republished, with some documents annexed, relating to the same subject; and I lost no time in procuring you one"

22.08.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@matthewschafer is following 20 prominent accounts