ReproducibiliTea's Avatar

ReproducibiliTea

@reproducibilitea.org.bsky.social

Serving Reproducibili☕️ at 100+ locations: Blends include transparency, openess and robustness + spoonfuls of science. Find out more on our website: https://reproducibilitea.org/ Check out our podcast: https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea

1,999 Followers  |  293 Following  |  439 Posts  |  Joined: 12.12.2023  |  1.6271

Latest posts by reproducibilitea.org on Bluesky

Preview
Scientific fraud has become an ‘industry,’ alarming analysis finds Sophisticated global networks are infiltrating journals to publish fake papers

A new study, based on an analysis of thousands of publications and their authors and editors, shows paper mills are just part of a complex, interconnected system that includes publishers, journals, and brokers. scim.ag/3H9kwwQ

04.08.2025 19:15 — 👍 62    🔁 32    💬 0    📌 4
Preview
ReproducibiliTea Calendar ReproducibiliTea - Journal Clubs for Open Science

📣 Upcoming events - ReproducibiliTea online

📅 Check out our calendar for more details:
reproducibilitea.org/calendar

#OpenResearch #OpenScience #metasci #academicsky

04.08.2025 07:05 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Great article on an issue I think about a lot. AI developers incessantly web scrape for data with minimal quality checks. What happens when LLMs are trained on more AI generated content than genuine information? Especially concerning for students/ECRs navigating heavily compromised research corpora

04.08.2025 01:19 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

"Our motivation for writing this article stems from our individual and collective encounters with citational and academic exclusion."

By Sarah Sauvé, @saralilplants.bsky.social, ‪
@helenagellersen.bsky.social & @flavioazevedo.bsky.social from @forrt.bsky.social ‬and @reproducibilitea.org

02.08.2025 15:55 — 👍 16    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Figure 1. Mechanisms of power and privilege operating in citational practice and their effects on six individuals with different intersecting identities.

Figure 1. Mechanisms of power and privilege operating in citational practice and their effects on six individuals with different intersecting identities.

“This paper unpacks the concept of citation politics and its role in sustaining epistemic hierarchies within scholarly communities.”

osf.io/qjecy_v2

02.08.2025 15:55 — 👍 44    🔁 18    💬 4    📌 0
Preview
Peer review is broken, and pedagogical research has a fix The lessons of decades of research into assessment and feedback haven’t tracked across into the practice of peer review. Madeleine Pownall wonders why not The lessons of decades of research into asses...

I can never understand why efforts to improve peer review don’t learn from the decades of educational research about how to do good, robust, constructive assessment and feedback.

What would happen if we treated peer review as pedagogy?

New in @wonkhe.bsky.social

wonkhe.com/blogs/peer-r...

01.08.2025 06:01 — 👍 25    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1
Benefits of Open Access Publishing | OpenScienceLab

Open access publishing is transforming science by making research accessible, fostering collaboration, and supporting reproducibility. But APCs raise challenges. Learn more in our latest blog post.

🔗 opensciencelab.uc3m.es/blog/benefit...

01.08.2025 07:06 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Don't miss out on an engaging R4E event! Mark your calendars for Wednesday, October 8, 2025, at 10 AM ET / 3 PM CET. Secure your place now at forms.gle/yhxMsiXa1o7q.... Seize this chance to be part of something great! #academicsky

31.07.2025 16:16 — 👍 1    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

The call for proposals is now up for our long awaited #AIMOS2025 conference in Sydney this November:
aimos-inc.github.io/aimos.confer...

01.08.2025 00:28 — 👍 16    🔁 14    💬 1    📌 2
Analysis Blinding as a Potential Means to Foster a Productive Collaboration Between Original Authors and Replicators Recent awareness of the importance of rigor and robustness have deemed replication efforts vital for scientific advance. Yet the value of replication projects may often be undermined by post-hoc dispu...

new perspective in @collabrapsychology.bsky.social suggests “analysis blinding has the potential to prevent fruitless discussions and tension between original authors and replication teams in replication projects while preserving a healthy scientific debate”

online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art...

31.07.2025 07:10 — 👍 10    🔁 7    💬 0    📌 0

In which I note that OS is a social movement aimed at better aligning "good" & "successful" research - and shoutout @ukrepro.bsky.social, @reproducibilitea.org & our wonderful librarian allies like @openresleeds.bsky.social

English version here: open-science-future.zbw.eu/en/shift-tow...

31.07.2025 12:36 — 👍 6    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

We are creating an academic journal and *you* can shape it!

Make comments and suggest changes to replicationresearch.org 's
- Constitution
- TOP guidelines
- article types
- and reviewer guidelines
until September 5 and be credited as a contributor: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

31.07.2025 07:44 — 👍 28    🔁 13    💬 2    📌 0

“In particular, it [this paper] discusses how the virtue of docility, best understood as being “open to learning”, is a key virtue for training new scientists and for establishing robust processes of knowledge creation.”

31.07.2025 08:13 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Docility as a Primary Virtue in Scientific Research - Minerva Scientific epistemology is a topic that has sparked centuries of philosophical discourse. In particular, understanding the role that scientists play in the creation and perpetuation of scientific know...

📚 Docility as a Primary Virtue in Scientific Research
link.springer.com/article/10.1...

31.07.2025 08:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Psychologists & related fields: what is a big methods question that you believe remains somewhat unanswered & that you'd love to see adressed? There may be an opportunity for a large-scale meta-science project with many teams trying to figure out a question.

Any thoughts welcome! #psychscisky

30.07.2025 14:03 — 👍 142    🔁 56    💬 40    📌 7
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Check out the pictures from the conference below - a pleasure to attend and support OSIG and present the GRN!

30.07.2025 10:39 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Congratulations to the Open Science Interest Group (OSIG) based at Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg on their first #OpenScience Conference and for joining the GRN! 👏

You can check out their great work here ✅: uol.de/psychologie/...

30.07.2025 10:39 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing - Michelle N. Meyer, 2018 This Tutorial provides practical dos and don’ts for sharing research data in ways that are effective, ethical, and compliant with the federal Common Rule. I fir...

📚 Practical tips for ethical data sharing. doi.org/10.1177/2515...

30.07.2025 07:29 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Job opportunities at Retraction Watch Here are our current open positions: Editor, Medical Evidence Project Staff reporter, Retraction Watch Assistant researcher, Retraction Watch Database Learn more about the Center for Scientific Int…

The Center For Scientific Integrity, our parent nonprofit, is hiring! Two new positions:

-- Editor, Medical Evidence Project
-- Staff reporter, Retraction Watch

and we're still recruiting for:

-- Assistant researcher, Retraction Watch Database

29.07.2025 16:11 — 👍 26    🔁 26    💬 1    📌 2

Thank you for sharing and adding hashtags :)

29.07.2025 08:39 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists’ awareness of academic controversies This study sheds light on how journalists respond to evolving debates within academia around topics including research integrity, improper use of metrics to measure research quality and impact, and th...

📚 From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies. doi.org/10.1371/jour...

29.07.2025 07:09 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 1

This week's read: ‘Lazy’ authors? One in six scientific papers mischaracterize work they cite. buff.ly/QsS5FCa

"Errors may result from an author’s desire to mold a preconceived narrative."

Rigor is also about careful evaluation of evidence.

#ConfirmationBias #Citations #ScientificRigor

28.07.2025 14:49 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable - Nature Human Behaviour Four labs discovered and replicated 16 novel findings with practices such as preregistration, large sample sizes and replication fidelity. Their findings suggest that with best practices, high replica...

Next #ReproducibiliTea in #Bielefeld on August 1st is a special edition on #Retraction: We read Protzko et al. (2024)(www.nature.com/articles/s41...) and the corresponding Retraction Note (www.nature.com/articles/s41...) - Join us online/at V4-116. More info: burst.pages.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/burst/

28.07.2025 07:49 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Logos of AusRN and AIMOS and webinar announcement

Logos of AusRN and AIMOS and webinar announcement

Register now for the next joint @aimosinc.bsky.social @ausrepro.bsky.social webinar "Preventing statistical errors before publication" with Dr Michèle Nuijten and Dr Tom Hardwicke on Wed 27 Aug (4:00pm AEST).
@michelenuijten.bsky.social @tomhardwicke.bsky.social
qut.zoom.us/meeting/regi... 2/3

27.07.2025 02:17 — 👍 8    🔁 7    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience - PubMed We interpret the results as supporting the feasibility and usefulness of n-of-1 trials in clinical practice.

#statstab #395 The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness

Thoughts: Could RCTs comprised of 1 participant be useful? Maybe! And more so than large sample observational studies.

#Nof1 #RCTs #causalinference #research #methods #clinical

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2297206/

25.07.2025 20:32 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

The first version of the open science blog archive is complete, with 3530 posts from 52 blogs. Browse them in the online Shiny app: shiny.ieis.tue.nl/open_science... All blog posts are ordered chronologically. Have fun exploring part of the open science history in psychology!

26.07.2025 06:08 — 👍 46    🔁 16    💬 4    📌 0

📚 A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...

25.07.2025 07:20 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
ReproducibiliTea Podcast Podcast · ReproducibiliTea Podcast · Serving mugs of Reproducibili☕️: Blends include transparency, openness and robustness + a spoonful of science. Brewed by the @ReproducibiliT Team

✨ The ReproducibiliTea podcast is produced by members of the grassroots initiative ReproducibiliTea Global and covers a diverse range of topics relevant to the open science community aimed at improving research practices and academic culture. buff.ly/uavCYK3

24.07.2025 14:52 — 👍 6    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0
ReproducibiliTea Reading Lists

✨ ReproducibiliTea (@reproducibilitea.org) Reading Lists make it easier for journal clubs to find high quality, interesting, and thought-provoking articles for their discussions on Open Science, metascience, and related topics. buff.ly/UXqZ1YY buff.ly/e1egfKJ

24.07.2025 14:52 — 👍 7    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1

We are very pleased to have received the 2025 SIPS Commendations for our ReproducibiliTea reading lists rpt-rl.netlify.app and ReproducibiliTea podcast soundcloud.com/reproducibil... ✨

23.07.2025 15:32 — 👍 14    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0

@reproducibilitea.org is following 20 prominent accounts