Thatβs great. Itβs so funny to me.
20.11.2025 22:11 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@beenwrekt.bsky.social
Blog: https://argmin.substack.com/ Webpage: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brecht/
Thatβs great. Itβs so funny to me.
20.11.2025 22:11 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Does Anthropic let its interviewees use Claude Code?
20.11.2025 17:26 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0Justifying generative modeling and the principle of maximum likelihood in a single blog post.
20.11.2025 15:31 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0The NIMBYs are coming for Waymo... looking forward to the first filed CEQA complaint.
20.11.2025 15:06 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0I keep reposting this, but Phil Koopman took a stab at it. There were two Waymo-involved fatalities this year. This means their stats aren't actually that great.
20.11.2025 02:43 β π 13 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0Highly recommend the collected works of Freedman. Filled with gems. www.cambridge.org/core/books/s...
20.11.2025 01:24 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Think it might have been me... www.argmin.net/p/what-is-th...
20.11.2025 01:21 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Homeboy's LinkedIn page is truly a piece of work.
19.11.2025 17:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This did not happen. Sorry, not sorry.
19.11.2025 17:52 β π 11 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0This article about "AI is taking entry-level jobs" was making the rounds yesterday... but the author uses LinkedIn as primary sourcing. Come on, man.
19.11.2025 17:51 β π 11 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks for this thread. You and @grimalkina.bsky.social should collaborate on a blog post!
19.11.2025 17:47 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But it's the only social science that consistently finds 5-sigma interventions.
19.11.2025 14:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Given the author of that piece, I'm sure it falls into the atrocious category.
Please write more about why, Stephen. It's worth it.
A reduction of policymaking to prediction. Iβll write about why this is problematic tomorrow.
18.11.2025 15:29 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A+. Did you vibe code this?
18.11.2025 14:15 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Begun, the Butlerian Jihad has.
18.11.2025 14:01 β π 26 π 2 π¬ 2 π 013 penalties, 12 points! great football.
16.11.2025 23:11 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0More penalties than points in this Chiefs-Broncos game...
16.11.2025 22:22 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1The valuations of those note-taking app companies are quite something, no?
Abridge: 5.3 billion
Ambience: 1.3 billion
6.6 billion is the price of having a robot to blame...
That 2nd one is not pre-registered RCT z-scores. It's z-scores scraped from the Cochrane Library database. Moreover, why is that one good and the other one bad?
16.11.2025 00:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0From a recent talk of mine.
15.11.2025 21:43 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Iβll take a look, but what makes medicine different from the rest of the human facing sciences is *there are* magic bullets.
15.11.2025 20:24 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Could you explain a bit more what you mean by the 'motivating effect'? Why is it problematic in your mind?
15.11.2025 18:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, I agree it's an artifact that a threshold for publication is often "some p-value < 0.05." But in that case, I'd argue the distribution is exactly what I'd expect.
I wrote a bit about it here: www.argmin.net/p/milton-fri...
Yes. We can definitely say something non-gaussian is going on. But what is it? And how can we make normative claims that it's bad?
Most of the time, people point to this histogram as evidence of bad or questionable research practices. I want to know what backs such reactions.
Thanks for sharing.
15.11.2025 17:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think the hard part there is pinning down how the interventions and outcomes are selected. I don't even think you can come up with a well-posed probability distribution over "interventions." What's the sigma-algebra?
15.11.2025 17:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And I appreciate you, Berna!
15.11.2025 17:24 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, I've read van Zwet's papers before. He wasn't happy with my reading.
If you will, "fitting a mixture model" and explaining it with a just-so story is a questionable research practice.
I don't think this is a good model of science.
15.11.2025 17:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0