Files literally describing sending girls as gifts for people for the night.

Nooo trafficked people here. Nope.

Probably not.

If you ignore the rest, yes.

Or fear. You take a bribe and look away bdcause you can somehow rationalize to yourself that it's ok. Then you're asked to do more and protect worse, and you've already come this far so okay..

Then you see the true horrors and you're already complicit.

It's one way to corrupt someone too.

Straight from mrs alf.

Russia launched another massive strike against Ukrainian energy infrastructure overnight on February 6 to 7 and specifically targeted substations that support Ukrainian nuclear power plants (NPPs). Read more here: www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/rus...

It certainly amused me at any rate.

I put it on imgur and i printed stickers of qr codes pointing to the url. Stuck em on server racks, coffee makers, a random lamp post outside, etc.

It's hard to be sure how much is real. But those names are mentioned a lot in the files. Especially Andrew, and Leon Black.

No, there's stuff explicitly sent via anonymous tip line that is 100% horseshit trolling where some things were censored, because they used automation to censor certain things.

There's more and worse in the files. Yes. Worse.

Leon Black was Trump’s companion on a trip to Russia in November 1996. Epstein knew David Geovanis, who lived in Russia at the time and organized the trip.

There’s more of this in Dataset 12 on the DOJ’s site, see e.g., www.justice.gov/epstein/file... (mentioning Mar a Lago on EFTA02731369)

He's all over these files.

I was asked to check this, the journal uses a Rail Fence Cipher, so you read each line up and down, left to right. The deciphered text in the article below is accurate, and names names. The file itself can be found here:
www.justice.gov/epstein/file...

There's tons of people saying how unfairly Epstein was treated in media etc, and how they'll always be there for him, their friend.

So nah, they don't regret anything but being found out.

They regret being found out.

Yes, but that includes his wikipedia article 20 times etc.

Don't get me wrong, he is dirty and up to his scalp in this. But the number of mentions doesn't tell you anything by itself.

My favorite alf. I still wonder sometimes if my old easter eggs of this alf get found randomly by people where i used to work.

This is bleak: Jes Staley, currently CEO of Barclays, reassuring Epstein that popular revolt against financial elites is unlikely because capitalism and pop culture have defanged social movements, leaving people more invested in consumption than justice.

Putin tankies be like...

Met some of these people in person. It's depressing as shit.

i started researching Russian disinfo networks in 2014 and writing about them in 2015 and the sheer amount of smug online assholes who dismissed every piece of reporting as CIA propaganda or whatever will never not piss me off

I thought the point was about the relative risks faced by women and men by one another, and how the risk men pose to women is far more serious (lethal) vs the risk women pose to men (humiliation).

But I guess that wasn't it then.

I'm not saying more women kill men than vice versa. I'm simply stating it does happen quite a bit.

So that's why I called it an overgeneralization.

Ah, I assumed you said no to everything I said, not just part of it, since you added no context to it.

Women are afraid of that, yes. Men don't sit around worried about walking home late at night and being attacked by women.

But enough wives have killed husbands that men can be concerned there.

Oh good timing for this from the Guardian

www.theguardian.com/media/2026/f...

You're certainly allowed to disagree with reality as much as you want, but it is absurd to say women don't also kill.

Yes but doesn't end there. Many more.

* Gary, not Greg Ginsberg. My bad.