Michael Rodgers's Avatar

Michael Rodgers

@prodgersmichael.bsky.social

MD, clinical microbiology. Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

569 Followers  |  536 Following  |  95 Posts  |  Joined: 16.11.2024  |  2.3155

Latest posts by prodgersmichael.bsky.social on Bluesky

In my mind it is strongly associated with (functional) asplenia and alcoholism.

06.10.2025 19:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I like the quiz. Shared it with some colleagues too who enjoy it.

28.09.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What is Pruno?

25.09.2025 12:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I would add something watery. Swimming in open water, nasal irrigation etc.

20.09.2025 07:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Only one question a day allowed? I want to do more!

20.09.2025 06:09 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Rarely, but still we see it now and then. Hints are long time to positivity (>36 hours) and low clinical suspicion. Usually turns out to be a non-fermenter (one of the very low-pathogenic types).

15.09.2025 07:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A talk given by one of the chairs of our national medical ethical committee and prof. in epidemiology said a survey was done showing the β€˜public’ accepts a pre-test probability of 30-70%. So we see equipoise as a probability of somewhere between 30-70% that the intervention is better.

15.08.2025 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That would make doing any RCT’s impossible. Because then you should also say that if the pretest probability of benefit is higher than 50%, it is also unethical to withhold the intervention in an RCT. Meaning you can only ever do an RCT if the probability is exactly 50%.

15.08.2025 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can your lab test specifically for dalbavancin susceptibility?

15.08.2025 19:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

For me the β€˜Maltese cross’ is something I always think of when thinking of Babesia. But maybe too detailed for the card.

15.08.2025 19:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Hi, just read this post. Great read! Also shared it with colleagues.

09.08.2025 19:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why do you prefer amp-sulbactam?

30.07.2025 18:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow, interesting

28.07.2025 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seems to be going okay. Has been in use again for a few years.

27.07.2025 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

27.07.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I know, which is the reason why it disappeared from use in the Netherlands for decades. However now it’s being used more and more again, mostly iv.

27.07.2025 19:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah I see, good point. Though it would be weird to find those in a blood culture. Never seen that myself.

27.07.2025 19:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably all zoonotic species. Never heard of the human commensal species causing serious infections.

26.07.2025 20:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Was the patient asplenic or alcoholic?

26.07.2025 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Metamizole as well

26.07.2025 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When you say hepatitis C is treated in primary care, do you mean GP’s are the ones prescribing the antivirals?

26.07.2025 20:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Hadn’t heard of that dogma. We don’t do it here in The Netherlands. Had S. aureus in two urine cultures today. Just check their file to see if they have symptoms pointing to SAB. If not, I ignore it.

21.07.2025 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting thread!

21.07.2025 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Rare to have GBS in an adult. Any idea what caused the infection in this patient?

27.06.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Never heard of that. Depending on your audience maybe consider writing the acronym in full.

07.06.2025 15:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What is MPGN?

07.06.2025 08:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

B. If I find S. aureus of S. pyogenes, I will only cover that. Something less obviously, I will also cover anaerobes.

28.05.2025 05:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

6 weeks.

25.05.2025 11:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

You can check the distribution on EUCAST mic.eucast.org/search/show-...

21.05.2025 05:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did Hymenolepis change? CDC still calls it that.

27.04.2025 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@prodgersmichael is following 19 prominent accounts