IT’S CALLED SAMSARA?
03.02.2026 22:28 — 👍 166 🔁 23 💬 9 📌 0@bitdizzy.bsky.social
god’s favorite daughter (derogatory)
IT’S CALLED SAMSARA?
03.02.2026 22:28 — 👍 166 🔁 23 💬 9 📌 0If we don't ensure that Collaborators Get It Worse—like the French did to the Vichy secret police— the incentives will always be in favor of manipulative abusers and the simpering hypocrites who bend this way and that.
04.02.2026 00:31 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0If we don't ensure that Collaborators Get It Worse—like the French did to the Vichy secret police— the incentives will always be in favor of manipulative abusers and the simpering hypocrites who bend this way and that.
04.02.2026 00:31 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0(gesture)
04.02.2026 00:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i'm an ultrafinitist 😇 you are right that Sokal abused them like a narcissistic abuser because their thoughts intellectually intimidated him—if you would consult the rape archon of the rape god's own words:
04.02.2026 00:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0hiii i owe you a trip to the new york botanic garden bring your own brick to lob at my head
04.02.2026 00:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0one of the most prominent vaginoplasty surgeons in the US is so dedicated to his craft that he embedded himself in the child (and trans!) rape club. It must be so difficult to balance your time between DOING the raping, and creating future rape objects.
sufficient consequences do not exist
The sacred works [Koran, hadith, etc.] are full of passages referring to the jihad. Saladin was more assiduous and zealous in this than in anything else.... Jihad and the suffering involved in it weighed heavily on his heart and his whole being in every limb; he spoke of nothing else, thought only about equipment for the fight, was interested only in those who had taken up arms, had little sympathy with anyone who spoke of anything else or encouraged any other activity.
(touching a painting as if it's a photograph of my long lost father)
16.09.2024 02:49 — 👍 13 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1@regimecpa.bsky.social i have a company hat idea for you
04.02.2026 00:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i hate crack i smoke meth
04.02.2026 00:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Derrida later responded to the hoax in "Sokal et Bricmont ne sont pas sérieux" ("Sokal and Bricmont Aren't Serious"), first published on November 20, 1997, in Le Monde. He called Sokal's action "sad" for having trivialized Sokal's mathematical work and "ruining the chance to carefully examine controversies" about scientific objectivity.[18] Derrida then faulted him and Bricmont for what he considered "an act of intellectual bad faith" in their follow-up book, Impostures intellectuelles: they had published two articles almost simultaneously, one in English in The Times Literary Supplement on October 17, 1997[19] and one in French in Libération on October 18–19, 1997,[20] but while the two articles were almost identical, they differed in how they treated Derrida.
it was derrida! rare i hate that guy W— tremendous burn
04.02.2026 00:17 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Derrida later responded to the hoax in "Sokal et Bricmont ne sont pas sérieux" ("Sokal and Bricmont Aren't Serious"), first published on November 20, 1997, in Le Monde. He called Sokal's action "sad" for having trivialized Sokal's mathematical work and "ruining the chance to carefully examine controversies" about scientific objectivity.[18] Derrida then faulted him and Bricmont for what he considered "an act of intellectual bad faith" in their follow-up book, Impostures intellectuelles: they had published two articles almost simultaneously, one in English in The Times Literary Supplement on October 17, 1997[19] and one in French in Libération on October 18–19, 1997,[20] but while the two articles were almost identical, they differed in how they treated Derrida.
it was derrida! rare i hate that guy W— tremendous burn
04.02.2026 00:17 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0@hideokojimaen.bsky.kojimaproductions.jp have you heard about the 6000 year war for the soul of the transsexual?
04.02.2026 00:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i'm buff snait
04.02.2026 00:13 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0gee buff snait, you sure know a lot about forum beef
04.02.2026 00:13 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Greatest hits including:
"I listened to someone who admitted to making that shit up"
"I used his sexual harasser as a character witness"
"Misc Racefaker Conspiracy Theory"
always is
04.02.2026 00:12 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0of course you don't give a fuck. monetary deflation is a serious crisis for Haters right now
04.02.2026 00:12 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0(turning around randomly to face my wall, holding my hand out at my silhouette holding a knife aloft) HALT—who gloams there! oh it's just you :)
04.02.2026 00:11 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0he baja blasted his closed timelike curve clone's prostate so hard it collapsed into its schwarzchild radius
04.02.2026 00:08 — 👍 23 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0does the stochastic parrot fw Allah or nah
04.02.2026 00:06 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0does the stochastic parrot fw Allah or nah
04.02.2026 00:06 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0narcissisms is the same but this is what happens when you do research chemicals and don't get the point of sunyata
04.02.2026 00:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0WAIT— DID THEY GO AFTER HUNTER BIDEN BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO BE PART OF THE CHILD RAPE CONSPIRACY? WERE THEY RUNNING A PROTECTION RACKET AND SEXUAL BLACKMAIL FOR THE ENTIRE ANGLOID BOURGEOISIE OVER SKYPE?
04.02.2026 00:04 — 👍 52 🔁 7 💬 3 📌 0spongebob todo list
printing out Kezosian apology forms
04.02.2026 00:00 — 👍 23 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 2issue of skill
03.02.2026 23:59 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0and how do you think the quirked up white boy smoked crack with latinas, without the backing of an international conspiracy of billionaire creeps?
03.02.2026 23:53 — 👍 64 🔁 13 💬 2 📌 0i’m beating his ass when i’m relieved i’m taking him to military court
03.02.2026 23:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0