Sander Vandenhaute's Avatar

Sander Vandenhaute

@sanderhaute.bsky.social

Computational physics/chemistry, and some ML prev: PhD @ Ghent University πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ, AI researcher @ Orbital Materials πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ now: postdoc @ Rotskoff group (Stanford University)

83 Followers  |  280 Following  |  20 Posts  |  Joined: 21.10.2023  |  2.2077

Latest posts by sanderhaute.bsky.social on Bluesky

... so definitely more than 4.4 but less than 4.6 million? /s

source?

05.11.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Just expressing my support for typst as well! It’s mature enough to typeset a PhD thesis, has a very mellow learning curve, and has a great community.

11.05.2025 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Orb-v3 out now -- achieves SOTA on speed *and* accuracy

arxiv.org/abs/2504.06231

09.04.2025 12:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Ridgeline chart showing the distribution of global daily air temperature differences from the pre-industrial reference period (1850-1900), for every year between 1940 and 2024. Each individual year resembles a hill, shaded in a darker shade of red and further to the right for warmer years. The trend is clearly towards warmer years, with 2024 standing out as first year above 1.5C.

Ridgeline chart showing the distribution of global daily air temperature differences from the pre-industrial reference period (1850-1900), for every year between 1940 and 2024. Each individual year resembles a hill, shaded in a darker shade of red and further to the right for warmer years. The trend is clearly towards warmer years, with 2024 standing out as first year above 1.5C.

NEW: 2024 has just been confirmed as the warmest year on record, and the first to breach the 1.5C threshold.

We used a ridgeline (Joy Division inspired) chart to visualise daily temperature anomalies since 1940.

2024 clearly stands out with 100% of its days above 1.3C and 75% above 1.5C.

10.01.2025 08:04 β€” πŸ‘ 5920    πŸ” 2768    πŸ’¬ 211    πŸ“Œ 332
Preview
Typst: Compose papers faster Focus on your text and let Typst take care of layout and formatting. Sign up now and speed up your writing process.

typst (the definitive Latex successor) and manim (for stunning visuals/movies/slideshows) are two incredibly useful pieces of software

typst.app
github.com/3b1b/manim

15.01.2025 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Anne Gagneux, Ségolène Martin, @quentinbertrand.bsky.social Remi Emonet and I wrote a tutorial blog post on flow matching: dl.heeere.com/conditional-... with lots of illustrations and intuition!

We got this idea after their cool work on improving Plug and Play with FM: arxiv.org/abs/2410.02423

27.11.2024 09:00 β€” πŸ‘ 354    πŸ” 102    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 11

Here I was thinking I’d have a hard time convincing people RPA is empirical.

Do quantum monte carlo techniques have true potential or are we stuck with decades-old approximations invented by highly noncomputational scientists?

29.11.2024 00:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

simple Python API; to drive a single 'master' job which then does everything else!

25.11.2024 18:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

scalable molecular simulation: github.com/molmod/psiflow

scientific: ML potentials, DFT and post-HF calculations, (path-integral) MD, replica exchange, alchemical Ξ”F , hessians, ...

technical: automated job submission, simple Python, scales to >100 nodes, containerized!

25.11.2024 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

is there a #compchem starter pack here?

25.11.2024 14:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

a golden (πŸ˜‚) PES

Actually, from that perspective, even a 1000x slowdown could be acceptable since it would be used less for super long MDs and more for building models above and beyond atomic-level MD...

24.11.2024 23:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

From a distance, and this is probably controversial, but it feels like AF has made so much progress that would have otherwise required decades of atomic simulations ?

24.11.2024 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

For drug discovery, do you think more accurate atomic interactions are the way to go, or will people gradually abandon bottom-up atomic-level simulations?

24.11.2024 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So as long as all possible low-density environments are included in training, putting a limit at fixed cutoff makes sense?

24.11.2024 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hmm, yeah, and maybe the fixed neighbors thing is just a trick to speed up training and improve performance on the synthetic benchmarks

At the same time: beyond a β€œthreshold” number of neighbors there is maybe so much screening that the required # neighs to include becomes a constant?

24.11.2024 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I should really get out of my matsci cave because I am so unaware of these things πŸ˜‚

I was imagining OpenMM with a bunch of custom force expressions, PME, and anisotropic pressure control (often needed in solid state) at 1 ms / step β€” and maybe 100 ms / step for MACE for a similar system, approx..

24.11.2024 14:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

at least in my experience!

24.11.2024 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Although matbench leading entries usually truncate the number of neighbors to consider to a fixed number, such that the cost of a single message passing layer no longer scales with density …

24.11.2024 14:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right sorry, wasn’t counting bio! Though I think it’s more the increased density rather than shear system size that widens the performance gap?

In matsci / catalysis, with proper enhanced sampling, the main worry is not so much the achievable time scales rather than the accuracy of the QM data…

24.11.2024 14:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

100x because that’s how much slower an β€œoptimized” ML potential for any particular system would be. I might be optimistic here but a small MACE network and the right training data have always gotten me below ~1 meV/atom and ~50 meV/A errors.

24.11.2024 11:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Epic capture ….Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona βœ¨πŸ‘βœ¨πŸ˜Žβœ¨

24.11.2024 02:05 β€” πŸ‘ 71389    πŸ” 4843    πŸ’¬ 1271    πŸ“Œ 347
Post image

Thrilled to announce Boltz-1, the first open-source and commercially available model to achieve AlphaFold3-level accuracy on biomolecular structure prediction! An exciting collaboration with Jeremy, Saro, and an amazing team at MIT and Genesis Therapeutics. A thread!

17.11.2024 16:20 β€” πŸ‘ 611    πŸ” 204    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 25
Preview
Free Energy Calculations using Smooth Basin Classification The efficiency of atomic simulations of materials and molecules can rapidly deteriorate when large free energy barriers exist between local minima. We propose smooth basin classification, a...

link: arxiv.org/abs/2404.03777

08.04.2024 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

new SOTA on collective variable learning!

gist? Train classifier in feature space of pretrained GNN to predict 'phase' of an atomic geometry:

CV(A->B) = logit(B) - logit(A)

+data-efficient
+invariant wrt trans/rot/perm
+compatible w foundation models!

08.04.2024 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@sanderhaute is following 19 prominent accounts