State Farm's Super Bowl ad may not have had the intended effect
10.02.2026 10:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@robnrdc.bsky.social
Works at the Natural Resources Defense Council on issues related to climate adaptation, insurance, policy, and escalating disaster risks due to climate change. Also a real downer at cocktail parties.
State Farm's Super Bowl ad may not have had the intended effect
10.02.2026 10:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Gov. Pritzker's call for state oversight of insurance prices overlooks the need for state action on risk reduction efforts. Absent efforts to control rising risks, the state might just be rubber stamping rate increases justified by mounting disaster losses.
chicago.suntimes.com/illinois-gov...
Today's a great day. After months of inadvertently hitting the Microsoft Co-Pilot button on my laptop keyboard, my IT department is disabling it!
30.01.2026 17:31 β π 7 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Mmmm. Made from scratch cornbread stuffing. One of my favorite things to make for Thanksgiving
27.11.2025 17:20 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0New report from @NRDC and @EDF on funding voluntary buyouts.
Buyouts not only allow high-risk property owners to move somewhere safer but also the newly acquired properties can become part of the communityβs longer-term climate resilience plans.
www.nrdc.org/press-releas...
First step to solving a problem is recognizing we have one...a very big one.
subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...
Illinois AG's seeking information about State Farm's huge rate increases in Illinois. That may turn up other factors, but I told @Law360 why premiums may rise for years to come.
"If our homes aren't built for the future, then homes won't be insurable in the future."
www.law360.com/insurance-au...
Headquartered in Illinois, State Farm is not interested on providing data to the Illinois Department of Insurance about its insurance business.
Illinois AG is going to have State Farm explain this to the courts.
www.chicagobusiness.com/insurance/il...
"If Illinois wants stable and sustainable insurance and housing markets, then climate resilience and risk reduction must be a higher priority, in addition to appropriate regulatory oversight of the prices insurers charge homeowners."
15.10.2025 16:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"If homes arenβt built to withstand future storms, then those homes will not be insurable in the future. Itβs just that simple."
15.10.2025 16:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0"The so-called βinsurance crisisβ is actually an βinsurability crisis.β Most homes were never built to survive the types of disaster events we see today and will see in the future. Across the countryβand Illinoisβhomes are becoming uninsurable as a result."
15.10.2025 16:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0My op-ed was published today in @crainschicago.bsky.social re: whyt Illinois must do more on risk reduction and climate resilience in order to keep homeowners insurance prices stable. One need only look to LA, CA, and FL for what happens if you don't. www.chicagobusiness.com/opinion/illi...
15.10.2025 16:31 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Gilbert Gaul's recent piece in @yalee360.bsky.social should be required reading for state insurance regulators and officials who are responsible for bldg codes and land use.
Where, what, and how we build today define tomorrow's problems.
e360.yale.edu/features/cli...
good inspiration
50 States, 50 Fixes www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Time to circle the firing squad up.
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09...
The administration's dismantling of risk reduction and disaster resilience programs will cost the nation dearly. My colleague, Anna Weber, makes a good case for keeping these programs.
progressive.org/op-eds/disas...
Story on "beach nourishment" project in South Carolina contains all-too-predictable sentiments that illustrate the futility of these projects
1) you can't just spray sand and expect it to stick
2) identical project done in 2014 and 2018 (see 1 above)
www.postandcourier.com/charleston_s...
It's quiet out there...thank goodness.
28.07.2025 13:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you missed Columbia University's Climate Mobility conference in June, you can learn more about it on @americaadapts.bsky.social.
www.americaadapts.org/episodes/ins...
But this is gaining ground w the administration's supporters??
www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
Does that make sense to anyone? In the aftermath of a flash flood that led to 120+ fatalities?
www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
π€―
14.07.2025 21:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Beautiful Spending Bill That Makes Climate Change Worse Protects Chickens From Climate Change
πππ www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Put down you Rolex Sec. Noem.
Times Up!
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c...
As President Trump heads to Texas, let's reflect on some of his previous disaster site visits, as told in this book.
www.simonandschuster.com/books/Whose-...
We've done this a couple times earlier...right?
www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/0...
I think that's what's so troubling
βWithout any official action,β the official said, βyouβre already seeing the theoryβ of the administrationβs new approach βtaking place in Texas.β
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
FEMA Administrator...I mean Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Administrator (kinda)...nowhere to be seen.
subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...
Just gaming this out, IF these were weather control devices...
Why would such a device be in the hands of a local tv affiliate and not an entity a bit higher up on the food chain, like a Bond villian or something?
What motive would the TV station have for creating such a storm?
Conspiracy theorists certain that weather radars operated by local
tv stations are weather control devices.
Not sure how we win this war of the minds. How does one correct such an amazingly off-kilter belief?