Annette Dolphin's Avatar

Annette Dolphin

@annieneuro.bsky.social

Neuropharmacologist at UCL. President of The Physiological society 2025. Calcium channel nerd. Views my own

502 Followers  |  367 Following  |  49 Posts  |  Joined: 03.12.2023  |  1.867

Latest posts by annieneuro.bsky.social on Bluesky


The Matilda Effect: what an infuriating but all too familiar narrative of credit for discoveries owed to women in science being *stolen* by male colleagues who then go on to reap the recognition/profits from it and behave so appallingly.

18.01.2026 12:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 31    ๐Ÿ” 20    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Dear Sir Paul,

Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct

I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Muskโ€™s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues.  Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct and how it is applied.  

A 2018 report  from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that โ€œsexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicineโ€ and that โ€œgreater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20โ€“50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academiaโ€.  This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a โ€œpowerful incentive for changeโ€. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research.  In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research.  For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Muskโ€™s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that โ€œsexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicineโ€ and that โ€œgreater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20โ€“50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academiaโ€. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a โ€œpowerful incentive for changeโ€. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times  published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society โ€œshould only expel fellows if their science proved โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€โ€.  Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian  on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code โ€œmay need to be looked at againโ€, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. 

I suggest that changing the Royal Societyโ€™s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship.  The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers.  You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that โ€œthereโ€™s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advancesโ€.  Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists.

I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€ research.  This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society โ€œshould only expel fellows if their science proved โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€โ€. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code โ€œmay need to be looked at againโ€, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Societyโ€™s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that โ€œthereโ€™s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advancesโ€. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Societyโ€™s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is โ€œfaulty or fraudulent or highly defectiveโ€ research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.

Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.

12.01.2026 08:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 812    ๐Ÿ” 297    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 25    ๐Ÿ“Œ 29
Preview
ACTION: Sign the petition and tell the UK government to protect our pollinators. The UKโ€™s pollinator numbers are dropping heavily - we need the UK government to step in and protect them.

UK bee & pollinator populations are dropping. This is partly due to how many pesticides we use - it doesnโ€™t have to be this way. France has banned pesticides from towns & cities. Tell the UK Government to follow in their footsteps & protect our pollinators:

action.greenpeace.org.uk/save-the-bees

10.01.2026 13:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Beautiful paper! Somebody should do it in then viscerosensory brainstem.

08.01.2026 21:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Great paper!

07.01.2026 14:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Edith Bรผlbring FRS, physiologist and pioneer in the study of smooth muscle was born #OnThisDay in 1903. Bรผlbring came to Britain with her family to escape Nazi Germany. She went on to have an impressive research career and was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1958. #WomenInSTEM

27.12.2025 08:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Constanza Alcaino et al. from @ims-mrl.bsky.social present this #SymposiumReview discussing #incretin hormones and #obesity ๐Ÿ’‰ ๐Ÿ”Ž

๐Ÿ”— Read the article here: physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/...

19.12.2025 13:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
UK to rejoin EUโ€™s Erasmus student exchange programme Exclusive: British students will be able to participate in EU-wide scheme from January 2027, sources say

www.theguardian.com/world/2025/d...

16.12.2025 18:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
An image screenshot of the i Paper news article "UK set to turn back clock on Brexit and rejoin EU's student exchange scheme from January 2027".

An image screenshot of the i Paper news article "UK set to turn back clock on Brexit and rejoin EU's student exchange scheme from January 2027".

The right move. Young people's dreams shouldn't be limited by borders or bureaucracy.

11.12.2025 19:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 199    ๐Ÿ” 31    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
150 voices: Celebrating our members and their personal histories Keep up to date with The Physiological Societyโ€™s news. Press releases, job openings, policy developments, conferences and other physiology news.

๐Ÿ’ก Be part of the Societyโ€™s legacy - All abstracts presented throughout the year will be published in a special 150th Anniversary Abstract Booklet, which will become part of our historical archive capturing a snapshot of physiological research in 2026 โฌ‡๏ธ buff.ly/sYaWsDJ

12.12.2025 09:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Born #OnThisDay in 1906 was American computer scientist Grace Hopper. She was a pioneer of computer programming, developing programming languages like COBOL. She was one of the first programmers on the Harvard Mark I computer and is credited with writing the first computer manual. #WomenInSTEM

09.12.2025 15:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 41    ๐Ÿ” 18    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Roryโ€™s a true highlight of the morning. Inspirational, entertaining and sobering about how much we need to do as a research community.

09.12.2025 10:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 157    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Dorothy Bishop Prize 2026

Nominations for the UKRN Dorothy Bishop Prize 2026 have opened!

Named after @deevybee.bsky.social, the prize, first awarded in 2022, celebrates the contributions of early career researchers to research improvement.

Nominations close 18 January 2026.

#AcademicSky #Research

03.12.2025 12:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 40    ๐Ÿ” 41    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4
'Mesmerizing spider threads' by Dr Martin J. Ramirez, captures two exceptional silk threads of the Australian net-caster spider, Asianopis subrufa.

'Mesmerizing spider threads' by Dr Martin J. Ramirez, captures two exceptional silk threads of the Australian net-caster spider, Asianopis subrufa.

We're excited to announce the finalists of the #RSPPhotoComp 2025! ๐ŸŽ‰ Starting with #microimaging and overall winner, 'Mesmerizing spider threads' by Dr Martin Ramirez, capturing two exceptional silk threads of the Australian net-caster spider (sample obtained by Dr Jonas Wolff @evoimec.bsky.social).

04.12.2025 10:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 96    ๐Ÿ” 44    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 8

This is wonderful and also true.
The analogies you draw, the thoughts you suddely have, the roads you pursue, the structures you comprehend, simply because a piece of art or theatre shakes you up and makes you think differently.

02.12.2025 19:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 164    ๐Ÿ” 41    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Post image

๐Ÿ’ก Do you need support to develop new educational resources, conduct a pilot study or develop a new technique? Members can apply to our Education and Teaching Award or our Research and Knowledge Exchange Award for up to ยฃ10,000 in support. Find out more โžก๏ธ www.physoc.org/grants-and-p...

28.11.2025 12:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
UCL โ€“ University College London UCL is consistently ranked as one of the top ten universities in the world (QS World University Rankings 2010-2022) and is No.2 in the UK for research power (Research Excellence Framework 2021).

I'm hiring! Come and work with me at UCL to try and understand how the brain's blood vessels go wrong and promote dementia: www.ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/...

27.11.2025 09:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Post image

Rate your score on Factor Fexcectorn.

Well done, Scientific Reports. pubpeer.com/publications...

26.11.2025 18:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 165    ๐Ÿ” 52    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 18    ๐Ÿ“Œ 43
Preview
The case of the disappearing teaspoons: longitudinal cohort study of the displacement of teaspoons in an Australian research institute Objectives To determine the overall rate of loss of workplace teaspoons and whether attrition and displacement are correlated with the relative value of the teaspoons or type of tearoom. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting Research institute ...

70 teaspoons placed in tearooms around the institute & observed weekly over 5 months. 80% of spoons disappeared; spoon halflife~81 days. Communal room halflife lower than in specific labs. 250 spoons annually required to maintain 70 spoon population.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

20.11.2025 03:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 353    ๐Ÿ” 118    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 16    ๐Ÿ“Œ 64

Excellent book!

19.11.2025 11:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Great opportunity for junior/mid career neuroscientists in Europe! Do apply!

17.11.2025 16:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

The screening study will target hidden exposure to lead in children and lays the groundwork for nationwide testing. The initiative follows a two-year FT investigation that revealed millions of Britons may be unknowingly exposed to the toxic metal. on.ft.com/47K8Ivp

17.11.2025 06:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 59    ๐Ÿ” 15    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
First page of Opinion piece: "Conceptual and methodological flaws undermine claims of a link between the gut microbiome and autism"

First page of Opinion piece: "Conceptual and methodological flaws undermine claims of a link between the gut microbiome and autism"

The link between the gut #microbiome and autism is not backed by science, researchers say.

Read the full opinion piece in @cp-neuron.bsky.social: spkl.io/63322AbxpA

@wiringthebrain.bsky.social, @statsepi.bsky.social, & @deevybee.bsky.social

13.11.2025 16:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 245    ๐Ÿ” 122    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 30
Preview
Sharon Camp, Mother of the โ€˜Plan Bโ€™ Contraceptive Pill, Dies at 81

Anyone whoโ€™s ever used emergency contraception or gains peace of mind by even having it on hand owes Dr Camp a debt of gratitude. What a force.

(Also, I just learned one reason the FDA rejected it at first was that they said the name Plan B was too glib!)

Great obitโ€”no paywall.

14.11.2025 14:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1716    ๐Ÿ” 616    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9    ๐Ÿ“Œ 29

Really looking forward to this

12.11.2025 18:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Our lab is looking for a postdoc! We have interesting projects and cutting-edge techniques such as Neuropixels Opto, Light Beads Microscopy and more. We would be delighted to receive your application. Deadline is 25 November 2025. More info here:
www.ucl.ac.uk/cortexlab/po...

12.11.2025 15:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 39    ๐Ÿ” 26    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...

Important new study from the Geranton lab. Check it out!

Analgesia through FKBP51 inhibition at disease onset confers lasting relief from sensory and emotional chronic pain symptoms | PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

12.11.2025 13:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Climate change and mental health report The climate change and mental health thematic assessment report synthesises the evidence base relating to climate change and mental health.

Link to UKHSA report released today: www.gov.uk/government/p...

Link to @ThePhySoc / @wellcometrust report: www.physoc.org/policy/clima...

12.11.2025 11:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Australian scientist who alerted world that Covid is airborne wins top science prize Prof Lidia Morawska says recognition of her research comes at a fraught time โ€“ an โ€˜age of anti-scienceโ€™

Great news as Prof Lidia Morawska who has done fantastic work on particulate matter and raised awareness of the fact that covid 19 can be spread via airborne route has just won a prize in recognition of her achievements

12.11.2025 08:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 215    ๐Ÿ” 72    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 8
Post image Post image

Join us on 26 Nov (12 - 1pm GMT) for a webinar sharing early findings from @UCLโ€™s REPAIR Project, exploring structural inequities in funding, recognition & career progression.
Free to attend
Register here: www.bna.org.uk/events/ems-e...

#ResearchCulture# STEMEquity #Neuroscience #AcademicCareers

10.11.2025 09:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

@annieneuro is following 20 prominent accounts