I am Jack's Cellphone's Avatar

I am Jack's Cellphone

@jackscellphone.bsky.social

811 Followers  |  3,897 Following  |  1,771 Posts  |  Joined: 06.02.2024  |  2.0693

Latest posts by jackscellphone.bsky.social on Bluesky

Any Which Way You Can - Barfight
YouTube video by actorwilliamsmith Any Which Way You Can - Barfight

β€œRight turn, Clyde…” πŸ‘

05.08.2025 02:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A smiley faced yellow sponge held in my left hand in front of a white porcelain sink with black metal grate being washed within

A smiley faced yellow sponge held in my left hand in front of a white porcelain sink with black metal grate being washed within

β€œBut, it’s a cute vector for food poisoning” πŸ‘

05.08.2025 02:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

It is, however, always important to keep some handy laymen around (self-reference in full effect) πŸ‘

05.08.2025 01:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Evil Will Always Triumph, Because Good Is Dumb - Dark Helmet
YouTube video by My Favorite Quotes Evil Will Always Triumph, Because Good Is Dumb - Dark Helmet

πŸ‘

05.08.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

"Strato"-anything as a prefixπŸ‘
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_...

04.08.2025 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Two pages from the Dr. Suess book "Fox in Socks" with text as follows:

First, I'll make a quick trick brick stack. Then I'll make a quick trick block stack.
You can make a quick trick chick stack.
You can make a quick trick clock stack.
10
11

Two pages from the Dr. Suess book "Fox in Socks" with text as follows: First, I'll make a quick trick brick stack. Then I'll make a quick trick block stack. You can make a quick trick chick stack. You can make a quick trick clock stack. 10 11

πŸ‘

04.08.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A red gas can on a brown desk, a black keyboard in front and a computer screen in the background with a spreadsheet open

A red gas can on a brown desk, a black keyboard in front and a computer screen in the background with a spreadsheet open

My experience is that it is definitely a Gen X and prior thing; it was a very common sentiment growing up in the 70s/80sπŸ‘
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm8f...

04.08.2025 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Our Gen Z Daughter shooting a silver arrow off our back deck into the yard from a red and black bow

Our Gen Z Daughter shooting a silver arrow off our back deck into the yard from a red and black bow

"We have AIM at home" - Gen X & our Gen Z Kids πŸ‘

04.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Not great, but it hits a certain… β€œsatisfying”…spot πŸ‘

03.08.2025 19:19 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Our Daughter as a youth, reading an aquamarine copy of the book β€œLatin for all Occasions” on a white carpet

Our Daughter as a youth, reading an aquamarine copy of the book β€œLatin for all Occasions” on a white carpet

Our Teenage Daughter asked me last year how I am able to talk to people unfamiliar to me with ease. As I starting explaining how in middle school I was thrown in front of a couple thousand people to give a speech at a Latin Convention, I realized how much of that skill is a product of serendipity πŸ‘

03.08.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A satirical meme featuring USMC General Mathis on the right in uniform, white background, text to the left as follows:

Always carry a knife with you. Just in case there’s cheesecake, or you need to stab someone in the throat.

A satirical meme featuring USMC General Mathis on the right in uniform, white background, text to the left as follows: Always carry a knife with you. Just in case there’s cheesecake, or you need to stab someone in the throat.

β€œI only need to know one thing about cheesecake man, where…it…is…” πŸ‘

03.08.2025 19:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Limp Bizkit - Live at Lollapalooza Chile 2024 [FULL STREAM HD]
YouTube video by bzk Limp Bizkit - Live at Lollapalooza Chile 2024 [FULL STREAM HD]

β€œBack in my day…” πŸ‘

03.08.2025 18:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A TV showing VH1 playing the Backstreet Boys music video for β€œI Want It That Way” showing the members of the band in front of a white private jet in a hangar

A TV showing VH1 playing the Backstreet Boys music video for β€œI Want It That Way” showing the members of the band in front of a white private jet in a hangar

There’s a (different) app for that πŸ‘

03.08.2025 18:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Image of the cover of the Glassman & Hassett book "DOW 36,000" published in 1999, Wikipedia page as follows with description:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_36,000

Image of the cover of the Glassman & Hassett book "DOW 36,000" published in 1999, Wikipedia page as follows with description: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_36,000

"If I'm not back soon, just wait longer..." πŸ‘
ritholtz.com/2009/09/dow-...

03.08.2025 16:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot from the Wikipedia page for Robert Horry with text as follows:

Robert Horry

Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history

Tools
Appearance hide
Text

Small

Standard

Large
Width

Standard

Wide
Color (beta)

Automatic

Light

Dark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Robert Horry

Horry in 2012
Personal information
Born	August 25, 1970 (age 54)
Harford County, Maryland, U.S.
Listed height	6 ft 10 in (2.08 m)
Listed weight	240 lb (109 kg)
Career information
High school	Andalusia (Andalusia, Alabama)
College	Alabama (1988–1992)
NBA draft	1992: 1st round, 11th overall pick
Drafted by	Houston Rockets
Playing career	1992–2008
Position	Power forward / small forward
Number	25, 5
Career history
1992–1996	Houston Rockets
1996–1997	Phoenix Suns
1997–2003	Los Angeles Lakers
2003–2008	San Antonio Spurs
Career highlights
7Γ— NBA champion (1994, 1995, 2000–2002, 2005, 2007)
NBA All-Rookie Second Team (1993)
Second-team All-SEC (1992)
Third-team All-SEC (1990)
SEC All-Defensive Team (1992)
Fourth-team Parade All-American (1988)
Career statistics
Points	7,715 (7.0 ppg)
Rebounds	5,269 (4.8 rpg)
Assists	2,343 (2.1 apg)
Stats at NBA.com Edit this at Wikidata
Stats at Basketball Reference Edit this at Wikidata
Robert Keith Horry (/ΛˆΙ’ri/ ORR-ee; born August 25, 1970) is an American former professional basketball player and current sports commentator. Horry was a member of seven championship winning teams and is considered, by some, to be one of the most clutch shooters in NBA history.[1] He was given the nicknames "Big Shot Rob"[a] for making big shots in multiple playoff games[3][4] and "Cheap Shot Rob" for dirty play throughout his career.[5][6][7]

Early life
Robert Keith Horry was born on August 25, 1970, in Harford County, Maryland. Soon afterwards his father, Staff Sergeant Robert Horry Sr., divorced his mother, Leila, and moved to South Carolina. Horry grew up in Andalusia, Alabama. Later, when Robert Sr. was stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia, the father and son met weekly.…

Screenshot from the Wikipedia page for Robert Horry with text as follows: Robert Horry Article Talk Read Edit View history Tools Appearance hide Text Small Standard Large Width Standard Wide Color (beta) Automatic Light Dark From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Robert Horry Horry in 2012 Personal information Born August 25, 1970 (age 54) Harford County, Maryland, U.S. Listed height 6 ft 10 in (2.08 m) Listed weight 240 lb (109 kg) Career information High school Andalusia (Andalusia, Alabama) College Alabama (1988–1992) NBA draft 1992: 1st round, 11th overall pick Drafted by Houston Rockets Playing career 1992–2008 Position Power forward / small forward Number 25, 5 Career history 1992–1996 Houston Rockets 1996–1997 Phoenix Suns 1997–2003 Los Angeles Lakers 2003–2008 San Antonio Spurs Career highlights 7Γ— NBA champion (1994, 1995, 2000–2002, 2005, 2007) NBA All-Rookie Second Team (1993) Second-team All-SEC (1992) Third-team All-SEC (1990) SEC All-Defensive Team (1992) Fourth-team Parade All-American (1988) Career statistics Points 7,715 (7.0 ppg) Rebounds 5,269 (4.8 rpg) Assists 2,343 (2.1 apg) Stats at NBA.com Edit this at Wikidata Stats at Basketball Reference Edit this at Wikidata Robert Keith Horry (/ΛˆΙ’ri/ ORR-ee; born August 25, 1970) is an American former professional basketball player and current sports commentator. Horry was a member of seven championship winning teams and is considered, by some, to be one of the most clutch shooters in NBA history.[1] He was given the nicknames "Big Shot Rob"[a] for making big shots in multiple playoff games[3][4] and "Cheap Shot Rob" for dirty play throughout his career.[5][6][7] Early life Robert Keith Horry was born on August 25, 1970, in Harford County, Maryland. Soon afterwards his father, Staff Sergeant Robert Horry Sr., divorced his mother, Leila, and moved to South Carolina. Horry grew up in Andalusia, Alabama. Later, when Robert Sr. was stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia, the father and son met weekly.…

:::COUGHCOUGH:::
www.si.com/nba/best-nba...

03.08.2025 15:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A construction fence and barrels along Columbia Pike in Arlington VA with a store front for "ACME PIE CO." in the background

A construction fence and barrels along Columbia Pike in Arlington VA with a store front for "ACME PIE CO." in the background

It wouldn't be Arlington without road consttruction in the backgroundπŸ‘

03.08.2025 15:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Screeenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows:

immediate political consequences (effectively ending challenges to the outcome of the 2000 presidential election), the Court's decision remains enduringly controversial, with good reason.11
Some great cases have produced very good judicial decisions. But at least some support Holmes's claim: sometimes the magnitude of the stakes: the "immediate overwhelming interest" in the outcome: partisan passions; a sense of urgency compressing the time for analysis and judg-ment all come together to irretrievably skew the performance of judicial duty. Sometimes great cases overwhelm judges' capacity to engage in careful and principled legal reasoning.
Trump v. Anderson was such a case.
It was a great and momentous case by any measure. It presented the hugely important constitutional question whether a former Presi-dent of the United States is constitutionally disqualified from holding that office again-or any significant office-by Section Three of the Four-teenth Amendment. Specifically, it posed the explosive question whether the 45th President of the United States, having sworn an oath to support the Constitution as president, had subsequently "engaged in" conduct constituting "insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. consti-tutional order. 12 The facts found at trial showed that then-President Donald Trump engaged in an attempt to overthrow the lawful result of the presidential election of 2020, including by summoning a mob of sup-porters to Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021 and inciting them to attack the capitol, with the goal of preventing the electoral count from certifying Trump's lawful defeat. 13 The Colorado Supreme Court had held, as a matter of federal constitutional law, that Trump-again a can-didate for the presidency in 2024-was disqualified from that office by Section Three and that this in turn made him legally ineligible to the state's ballot as a matter of Colorado election law. 14 On Januar…

Screeenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows: immediate political consequences (effectively ending challenges to the outcome of the 2000 presidential election), the Court's decision remains enduringly controversial, with good reason.11 Some great cases have produced very good judicial decisions. But at least some support Holmes's claim: sometimes the magnitude of the stakes: the "immediate overwhelming interest" in the outcome: partisan passions; a sense of urgency compressing the time for analysis and judg-ment all come together to irretrievably skew the performance of judicial duty. Sometimes great cases overwhelm judges' capacity to engage in careful and principled legal reasoning. Trump v. Anderson was such a case. It was a great and momentous case by any measure. It presented the hugely important constitutional question whether a former Presi-dent of the United States is constitutionally disqualified from holding that office again-or any significant office-by Section Three of the Four-teenth Amendment. Specifically, it posed the explosive question whether the 45th President of the United States, having sworn an oath to support the Constitution as president, had subsequently "engaged in" conduct constituting "insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. consti-tutional order. 12 The facts found at trial showed that then-President Donald Trump engaged in an attempt to overthrow the lawful result of the presidential election of 2020, including by summoning a mob of sup-porters to Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021 and inciting them to attack the capitol, with the goal of preventing the electoral count from certifying Trump's lawful defeat. 13 The Colorado Supreme Court had held, as a matter of federal constitutional law, that Trump-again a can-didate for the presidency in 2024-was disqualified from that office by Section Three and that this in turn made him legally ineligible to the state's ballot as a matter of Colorado election law. 14 On Januar…

Screenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows:

the case presented several major constitutional questions, one after an-other, and several of them were fairly novel. Sorting through the issues presented by Section Three-attending carefully to constitutional text. structure, history, logic, and original meaning, and then faithfully ap-plying that meaning was not an afternoon's work. 16 (And the Court did not believe it had a great many afternoons left in which to do the requi-site work: the March 5 date of the Colorado primary loomed before it. just a month after the date of oral argument.) Moreover, even if the law itself might not have been all that hard, the challenges of following the law where it led-of overcoming contrary initial instincts, inclinations, and intuitions; of being willing to displease friends, past allies, and pow-erful political figures or movements-might remain a difficulty.
All in all, the institutional, political, and personal pressures on the justices presented by Trump v. Anderson were enormous. It is fair to say that Trump v. Anderson required the justices to rise to the de-mands of the occasion in a way perhaps unrivaled in the Court's history.
They did not do so. Unlike great cases where the press of time and circumstances had the effect of concentrating the judicial mind to pro-duce important landmark constitutional decisions, the Court produced a flimsy decision in a high-stakes. high-profile, high-intensity, tight-deadline case. Trump v. Anderson is, unfortunately, a prime example of exactly what Holmes was concerned about. It was a "great case" that made risible constitutional law.
"insurrection," "rebellion," "aid or comfort," "enemies," "officer, etc.-have principled, discernible constitutional meaning, ascertainable by employing familiar practices for discovering and faithfully applying the original, objective public meaning of constitu-tional and other legal texts? (Yes.) Id. at 674-730. Does the original meaning of…

Screenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows: the case presented several major constitutional questions, one after an-other, and several of them were fairly novel. Sorting through the issues presented by Section Three-attending carefully to constitutional text. structure, history, logic, and original meaning, and then faithfully ap-plying that meaning was not an afternoon's work. 16 (And the Court did not believe it had a great many afternoons left in which to do the requi-site work: the March 5 date of the Colorado primary loomed before it. just a month after the date of oral argument.) Moreover, even if the law itself might not have been all that hard, the challenges of following the law where it led-of overcoming contrary initial instincts, inclinations, and intuitions; of being willing to displease friends, past allies, and pow-erful political figures or movements-might remain a difficulty. All in all, the institutional, political, and personal pressures on the justices presented by Trump v. Anderson were enormous. It is fair to say that Trump v. Anderson required the justices to rise to the de-mands of the occasion in a way perhaps unrivaled in the Court's history. They did not do so. Unlike great cases where the press of time and circumstances had the effect of concentrating the judicial mind to pro-duce important landmark constitutional decisions, the Court produced a flimsy decision in a high-stakes. high-profile, high-intensity, tight-deadline case. Trump v. Anderson is, unfortunately, a prime example of exactly what Holmes was concerned about. It was a "great case" that made risible constitutional law. "insurrection," "rebellion," "aid or comfort," "enemies," "officer, etc.-have principled, discernible constitutional meaning, ascertainable by employing familiar practices for discovering and faithfully applying the original, objective public meaning of constitu-tional and other legal texts? (Yes.) Id. at 674-730. Does the original meaning of…

Screenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows:

was by sweeping them aside, blinking at its judicial duties, and concoct-ing a bogus federalism rationale that let them avoid answering the real questions in the case. Trump v. Anderson settled very little, but it did allow the Justices to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court, put Trump back on the ballot, and move on. while presenting a (somewhat) united faΓ§ade.
Justice Barrett made the Court's attention to appearances sadly transparent: "For present purposes, our differences are far less im-portant than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case." And then the clinching, closing sentence: "That is the message Americans should take home."
But is it? Of course, judicial opinions should strive to persuade readers-litigants, leaders, lawyers, and lay citizens alike-of the legal correctness of the Court's conclusions, through sound legal argument and careful legal analysis. But should it really be thought the business of the Supreme Court to adjust the nation's political temperature, man-age public opinion, or instruct Americans on the "message" they "should take home" from the Court's decisions?155
What the Justices should do, individually and collectively, is nothing more or less than apply the Constitution as law, consistently, in a principled fashion. Each Justice swore an oath to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich." and to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me... under the Constitution and laws of the United States."156 Did the justices really adhere to this oath in Trump v. Anderson, or did they shrink from a faithful and impartial application of the Constitution, paying too much respect to particular persons and particular pressures?
The "message Americans should take home" from Trump v. An-derson is that when it wants to, the Supreme Court will find a way to avoid performing …

Screenshot from the paper linked above with text as follows: was by sweeping them aside, blinking at its judicial duties, and concoct-ing a bogus federalism rationale that let them avoid answering the real questions in the case. Trump v. Anderson settled very little, but it did allow the Justices to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court, put Trump back on the ballot, and move on. while presenting a (somewhat) united faΓ§ade. Justice Barrett made the Court's attention to appearances sadly transparent: "For present purposes, our differences are far less im-portant than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case." And then the clinching, closing sentence: "That is the message Americans should take home." But is it? Of course, judicial opinions should strive to persuade readers-litigants, leaders, lawyers, and lay citizens alike-of the legal correctness of the Court's conclusions, through sound legal argument and careful legal analysis. But should it really be thought the business of the Supreme Court to adjust the nation's political temperature, man-age public opinion, or instruct Americans on the "message" they "should take home" from the Court's decisions?155 What the Justices should do, individually and collectively, is nothing more or less than apply the Constitution as law, consistently, in a principled fashion. Each Justice swore an oath to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich." and to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me... under the Constitution and laws of the United States."156 Did the justices really adhere to this oath in Trump v. Anderson, or did they shrink from a faithful and impartial application of the Constitution, paying too much respect to particular persons and particular pressures? The "message Americans should take home" from Trump v. An-derson is that when it wants to, the Supreme Court will find a way to avoid performing …

Boy howdy, are theyπŸ‘
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

03.08.2025 15:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
An advertisement on local Washington DC television with the headline "THE POWER TO STOP REPUBLICANS"

An advertisement on local Washington DC television with the headline "THE POWER TO STOP REPUBLICANS"

Embrace your inner masochist πŸ‘

03.08.2025 14:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A Sunday television program showing a "MEDICARE COVERAGE HELPLINE" advertisement featuring WIlliam Shatner as a paid spokesman

A Sunday television program showing a "MEDICARE COVERAGE HELPLINE" advertisement featuring WIlliam Shatner as a paid spokesman

It's only us & the olds (redundancy, what is it?) πŸ‘

03.08.2025 14:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a man stands on a soccer field in front of stubhub advertisements ALT: a man stands on a soccer field in front of stubhub advertisements

πŸ‘

03.08.2025 14:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
From left to right: a VHS copy of the film "Event Horizon," a DVD copy of the film "Event Horizon," and a Bluray copy of the film "Event Horizon"

From left to right: a VHS copy of the film "Event Horizon," a DVD copy of the film "Event Horizon," and a Bluray copy of the film "Event Horizon"

πŸ‘

03.08.2025 12:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Our Daughter on a set of brown carpeted stairs with a Kids National Grographic magazine in hands. cover photo emblazoned with the headline "SNAKES!" and her response captured as thusly 😬

Our Daughter on a set of brown carpeted stairs with a Kids National Grographic magazine in hands. cover photo emblazoned with the headline "SNAKES!" and her response captured as thusly 😬

πŸ‘

03.08.2025 12:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Sometimes people need to just go have a beer πŸ‘

02.08.2025 21:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A brown loaf of baked sourdough bread in a burgundy Dutch oven on top of a white stove, lid off on the back burner, my left hand in the foreground with middle finger extended at said loaf

A brown loaf of baked sourdough bread in a burgundy Dutch oven on top of a white stove, lid off on the back burner, my left hand in the foreground with middle finger extended at said loaf

The one thing that might convince me there is a higher power in this world would be the fact that the universe has decided it will not allow me to make a proper sourdough (your looks great!) πŸ‘

02.08.2025 20:37 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot from the Wikipedia link above for the Catullus poem #85 with text as follows:

WIKIPEDIA
The Free Encyclopedia
00
Donate Create account Log in
...
:=
Catullus 85
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
8 languages
View history
Tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Catullus 85 is a poem by the Roman poet Catullus for his lover Lesbia, to whom he wrote some 25.[1] Its declaration of conflicting feelings is renowned for its drama, force and brevity. [2] The meter of the poem is the elegiac couplet.
Text [edit]
Γ–dΔ« et amō. QuārΔ“ id faciam fortasse requiris.
I hate and I love. Why I do this, perhaps you ask.
Nescio, sed fierΔ« sentiΓΆ et excrucior. [3]
I know not, but I feel it happening and I am tortured. [3]

Screenshot from the Wikipedia link above for the Catullus poem #85 with text as follows: WIKIPEDIA The Free Encyclopedia 00 Donate Create account Log in ... := Catullus 85 Article Talk Read Edit 8 languages View history Tools From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Catullus 85 is a poem by the Roman poet Catullus for his lover Lesbia, to whom he wrote some 25.[1] Its declaration of conflicting feelings is renowned for its drama, force and brevity. [2] The meter of the poem is the elegiac couplet. Text [edit] Γ–dΔ« et amō. QuārΔ“ id faciam fortasse requiris. I hate and I love. Why I do this, perhaps you ask. Nescio, sed fierΔ« sentiΓΆ et excrucior. [3] I know not, but I feel it happening and I am tortured. [3]

πŸ‘
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catullu...

02.08.2025 20:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

πŸ‘

02.08.2025 19:10 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A Lego rendtion of the Twin Towers in NYC made of gray plastic bricks depicting them after the impact of the second plane on 09/11/2001; tower on the left has an explosion depicted about 2/3rd of the way up while the tower on the right has a plume of smoke drifting up and to the left behind the tower on the left

A Lego rendtion of the Twin Towers in NYC made of gray plastic bricks depicting them after the impact of the second plane on 09/11/2001; tower on the left has an explosion depicted about 2/3rd of the way up while the tower on the right has a plume of smoke drifting up and to the left behind the tower on the left

πŸ‘

02.08.2025 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A screenshot from the short story "The Marching Morons" by CM Kornbluth as linked in the post above and text as follows:

While Rogge-Smith was still at the door, Barlow snapped, "What's the meaning of this? Why haven't I been consulted? How far have you people got and why have you been working on something I haven't authorized?"
"Didn't want to bother you, Chief," said Rogge-Smith. "It was really a technical matter, kind of a final cleanup. Want to come and see the work?"
Mollified, Barlow followed his statistician down the corridor.
"You still shouldn't have gone ahead without my okay," he grumbled. "Where the hell would you people have been without me?"
"That's right, Chief. We couldn't have swung it ourselves; our minds just don't work that way. And all that stuff you knew from Hitler-it wouldn't have occurred to us. Like poor Black-Kupperman."
They were in a fair-sized machine shop at the end of a slight upward incline. It was cold. Rogge-Smith pushed a button that started a motor, and a flood of arctic light poured in as the roof parted slowly. It showed a small spaceship with the door open.
Barlow gaped as Rogge-Smith took him by the elbow and his other boys appeared: Swenson-Swenson, the engineer; Tsutsugimushi-Duncan, his propellants man; Kalb-French, advertising.
"In you go, Chief," said Tsutsugimushi-Duncan. "This is Poprobterm."
"But I'm the world Dictator!"
"You bet, Chief. You'll be in history, all right-but this is necessary, I'm afraid."
The door was closed. Acceleration slammed Barlow cruelly to the metal floor. Something broke and warm, wet stuff, salty-tasting, ran from his mouth to his chin. Arctic sunlight through a port suddenly became a fierce lancet stabbing at his eyes; he was out of the atmosphere.
Lying twisted and broken under the acceleration, Barlow realized that some things had not changed, that Jack Ketch was never asked to dinner however many shillings you paid him to do your dirty work, that murder will out, that crime pays only tem…

A screenshot from the short story "The Marching Morons" by CM Kornbluth as linked in the post above and text as follows: While Rogge-Smith was still at the door, Barlow snapped, "What's the meaning of this? Why haven't I been consulted? How far have you people got and why have you been working on something I haven't authorized?" "Didn't want to bother you, Chief," said Rogge-Smith. "It was really a technical matter, kind of a final cleanup. Want to come and see the work?" Mollified, Barlow followed his statistician down the corridor. "You still shouldn't have gone ahead without my okay," he grumbled. "Where the hell would you people have been without me?" "That's right, Chief. We couldn't have swung it ourselves; our minds just don't work that way. And all that stuff you knew from Hitler-it wouldn't have occurred to us. Like poor Black-Kupperman." They were in a fair-sized machine shop at the end of a slight upward incline. It was cold. Rogge-Smith pushed a button that started a motor, and a flood of arctic light poured in as the roof parted slowly. It showed a small spaceship with the door open. Barlow gaped as Rogge-Smith took him by the elbow and his other boys appeared: Swenson-Swenson, the engineer; Tsutsugimushi-Duncan, his propellants man; Kalb-French, advertising. "In you go, Chief," said Tsutsugimushi-Duncan. "This is Poprobterm." "But I'm the world Dictator!" "You bet, Chief. You'll be in history, all right-but this is necessary, I'm afraid." The door was closed. Acceleration slammed Barlow cruelly to the metal floor. Something broke and warm, wet stuff, salty-tasting, ran from his mouth to his chin. Arctic sunlight through a port suddenly became a fierce lancet stabbing at his eyes; he was out of the atmosphere. Lying twisted and broken under the acceleration, Barlow realized that some things had not changed, that Jack Ketch was never asked to dinner however many shillings you paid him to do your dirty work, that murder will out, that crime pays only tem…

There is already an existing "IP" just sitting there in the public domain, waiting to be used for that πŸ‘
www.gutenberg.org/files/51233/...

01.08.2025 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A screenshot from CNN with the headline "TRUMP INSIDERS SENTENCED TO PRISON TIME" with portraits of various associates of Donald Trump including Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, etc.

A screenshot from CNN with the headline "TRUMP INSIDERS SENTENCED TO PRISON TIME" with portraits of various associates of Donald Trump including Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, etc.

Can we a GoFundme happening to license Rod Serling's likeness from his estate so he can show up in CGI form at the end narrating the plot twist that the Bio-Dome is actually a prison for its investors? πŸ‘

01.08.2025 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
A copy of George Orwell's novel "1984' held in my left hand in front of a bookshelf with various other books including several Iain M. Banks novels; book is white with blue and red text, a close up view of an eye with black pupil and blue cornea, and a yellow sticky note attached with black handwritten marker text as follows" "NOT AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL!"

A copy of George Orwell's novel "1984' held in my left hand in front of a bookshelf with various other books including several Iain M. Banks novels; book is white with blue and red text, a close up view of an eye with black pupil and blue cornea, and a yellow sticky note attached with black handwritten marker text as follows" "NOT AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL!"

We need a "Bio-Dome" remake with the original cast reimagined along those lines. Stephen Baldwin won't even need to act, he can just play himself (sorry for redundancy) πŸ‘

01.08.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jackscellphone is following 20 prominent accounts