alasdair's Avatar

alasdair

@alasdairc.bsky.social

Portland, OR. Physicist. City Liker.

222 Followers  |  597 Following  |  899 Posts  |  Joined: 29.05.2023  |  2.5293

Latest posts by alasdairc.bsky.social on Bluesky

wait what happened

16.10.2025 00:52 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

one of the best parts about living here

08.10.2025 01:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

really odd the timing of this fixation on portland. sending the guard, sending the 82nd airborne, all these right wing influencers coming to stir up trouble, pam fucking bondi wading in and calling PPB antifa, all within like a week. 0-60. really feels like they just got bored with charlie kirk

04.10.2025 23:46 β€” πŸ‘ 301    πŸ” 35    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 0

there were more words after the word "pertinent" if you were interested in what it was pertinent to

28.09.2025 17:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

is it bad that the president thinks he invented magic beds that heal you and forgot about it

28.09.2025 06:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it's very cool

28.09.2025 04:07 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

oh sure sorry, I'm also sceptical of that

28.09.2025 01:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

obviously theyre not exactly the same, its just obvious that "make a bunch of low cost shit" is totally a viable business strategy that makes money. for the same reason each developer currently doesn't build exactly one high priced house. developers can already choose to build less!

28.09.2025 01:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

same reason for-profit walmart does it

28.09.2025 00:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

hello from portland! the problem with trump's secretary of war sending the military here isn't that it's a distraction from healthcare, it's the part where the mad king randomly declared war on us!

28.09.2025 00:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

uh i think you mean the empathy ceremony?

27.09.2025 23:04 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

just call him a madman! sane people don't wake up on Saturday morning and go "I think I'll invade Portland because im mad about blm in 2020"

27.09.2025 21:47 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I wish Tina and Keith were doing less "we don't need troops here it's chill here" and more "Jesus christ it's insane to randomly declare war on us on a whim, you can't do that" tbh

27.09.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I deserve an award for resisting the urge to spam this in all the replies today

27.09.2025 20:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

usually it's wokely reinventing lynching, kinda a new one to wokely reinvent...ducking witches??

27.09.2025 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 60    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

yes because im not a dipshit who got negatively polarised into thinking the electoral college makes sense instead of adding dumb swinginess lol

27.09.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

yes they were, due to how swingy electoral college votes are the gap means way less than you think (for the reasons that have been described to you). literally nobody is confused about how large ~300 is compared to ~200

27.09.2025 18:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

it was close. if her support was slightly higher she would have won, that's what close means. that's literally the bit the ec obscures.

27.09.2025 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 27.09.2025 18:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

in terms of interpreting support the popular vote gives you more information, the ec adds swingy noise. literally nobody is confused about how the president is chosen

27.09.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

damn why didn't the affordable housing agency think of that they were too dumb to have someone send them a Tetris gif

27.09.2025 06:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

holy shit you're so close

they had a set funding and lot of land that they clawed from a public thats actively antagonistic to public housing. it was the parking or the 26 units.

27.09.2025 04:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

why not 100 parking spaces per unit

27.09.2025 04:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah tell me what the proper planning is lol

27.09.2025 04:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

please tell me the plan they should have done to get 2 parking spots per unit without losing 26 subsidised housing units

27.09.2025 03:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I live in the Pacific Northwest

27.09.2025 03:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

they had purchased that lot that is what they had to work with and the funding they had to work with what on earth are you talking about

27.09.2025 03:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

living without 2 parking spaces isn't "warehousing" and building 26 fewer housing units to make parking slightly more convenient is bad government policy

27.09.2025 03:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

...think it's good for the government to house people so they aren't homeless?

27.09.2025 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

what are you talking about did you want them to open a portal to the parking dimension

27.09.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@alasdairc is following 19 prominent accounts