Thank you so much for wanting to buy the file! 😊 If you subscribe to my Patreon, you can download a high-resolution file. If you prefer not to, please send me a dm and we'll find another way!
02.03.2026 08:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@yvanspijk.bsky.social
/'dʑowɪn/ • taalkundige | linguist • schrijver van 'Die goeie ouwe taal' en 'Woord voor woord' | author • all graphics and videos: http://tumblr.com/yvanspijk • Patreon: patreon.com/yvanspijk • photo by Dirk-Jan van Dijk
Thank you so much for wanting to buy the file! 😊 If you subscribe to my Patreon, you can download a high-resolution file. If you prefer not to, please send me a dm and we'll find another way!
02.03.2026 08:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The verb ‘to see’ is very distantly related to ‘to sue’ – and also to ‘segue’, ‘second’ and ‘sequence’.
They all come from a Proto-Indo-European root whose meaning can be reconstructed as “to follow”. In Germanic, it shifted to “to follow with the eyes”.
Click my new graphic to learn more:
1/
Yes, certainly! :)
02.03.2026 08:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My pleasure!
01.03.2026 21:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
It was *weid-. It became Latin 'vidēre', whence French 'voir', Spanish 'ver' etc.
Its perfect tense, based on the root variants *woid- and *wid-, became Proto-Germanic *witanan, whose meaning became "to know". Its English descendant is 'to wit'.
You didn't miss them: they're unrelated. :)
'To seek' comes from Proto-Indo-European *seh₂g-, while 'to search' comes from Latin 'circāre' ("to circle around").
Ah, yes, 'non sequitur' would've been a nice one to mention in the graphic.
01.03.2026 19:35 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
5/
The Dutch verb ‘zien’ has a weird past tense: ‘zag’. Where does that g come from? Dutch has preserved a very old Germanic trait, which has been lost in most other languages. On my Patreon (tier 1), I tell all about the interesting evolution of these verbs and their past tense (550 words).
4/
Perhaps the most interesting descendant in the light of today’s graphic is Lithuanian ‘sèkti’: this verb has both the original sense “to follow” and the newer “to observe”, which also arose on the way from Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic.
3/
In the Indo-European daughter languages, we can find many more descendants of *sekʷ-, such as Ancient Greek ἕπομαι (‘hépomai’, “to follow; to support; to pursue”), Sanskrit सच॑ते (‘sácate’, “to be associated with; to be connected with; to follow”), and Old Irish ‘seichithir’ (“to follow”).
2/
As the graphic shows, the Proto-Indo-European root that’s at the basis of these words is *sekʷ- (“to follow”). Through derivatives of its Latin descendant ‘sequī’, English words such as ‘prosecute’, ‘consequence’, ‘pursue’, ‘sequel’, and ‘execution’ are related to ‘to see’ and ‘to sue’ as well.
The verb ‘to see’ is very distantly related to ‘to sue’ – and also to ‘segue’, ‘second’ and ‘sequence’.
They all come from a Proto-Indo-European root whose meaning can be reconstructed as “to follow”. In Germanic, it shifted to “to follow with the eyes”.
Click my new graphic to learn more:
1/
Nice thread by the way! :)
01.03.2026 13:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In this case, Wiktionary is telling nonsense. 'Oma' comes from 'ootema', a children's form of 'grootma(ma)', just like 'opa' comes from 'grootpa(pa)'.
*Ammǭ could never become 'oma'; moreover, this wouldn't explain 'ootema' and 'opa'.
Have you ever noticed how many Irish surnames start with O'? O'Connor or O'Malley, for example? You might have assumed that it was just an abbreviation of "of" as in "o'clock". But you'd be wrong!
It's actually another form of the archaic Irish word ó, meaning "grandson" or "descendant".
Deze week vertel ik over het populaire Brabantse woord 'begaoie ~ begaaie':
28.02.2026 12:10 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0Mooi! :)
28.02.2026 12:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Zelf ken ik dat niet uit het hedendaagse taalgebruik, maar vroeger werd wel gezegd 'Hij heej z'n eige begaaid', en dat betekende dan ofwel dat hij dronken was ofwel dat hij het in de broek had gedaan.
28.02.2026 12:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Deze week vertel ik over het populaire Brabantse woord 'begaoie ~ begaaie':
28.02.2026 12:10 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0Heel hartelijk bedankt!
28.02.2026 12:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0?
28.02.2026 10:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Na de twee prijsnominaties van 'Die goeie ouwe taal' maakt nu mijn boek 'Woord voor woord: de verleden tijd van taal' kans op een prijs. Het is genomineerd voor de Language Industry Awards van De Taalsector én op de shortlist gezet!
Wil je dat ik win in de categorie 'beste boek', dan kun je ... 1/
De Language Industry Awards gaan over de hele taalsector, die zich echt niet beperkt tot Nederlandstalige boeken.
27.02.2026 20:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 04/ ... zijn waardering uit voor organisaties en professionals die taalexpertise op een positieve en vooruitstrevende manier inzetten.
27.02.2026 19:34 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
3/ ... inspirerende taalprojecten, innovatieve taaldiensten, uitmuntende publicaties en impactvolle evenementen. De LIA’s tonen de maatschappelijke relevantie en economische waarde van taalprofessionals en hun werk.
Tijdens de publieke stemmingsronde spreekt een breed publiek ... 3/
2/ ... me helpen: stem t/m 22 maart via de link hieronder. Daar lees je ook alles over 'Woord voor woord' en zijn conculega's:
www.languageindustryawards.eu/nominaties-2024-25/
De Language Industry Awards bekronen het beste uit de taalsector – de oscars van de taalsector. Ze onderscheiden ... 2/
Na de twee prijsnominaties van 'Die goeie ouwe taal' maakt nu mijn boek 'Woord voor woord: de verleden tijd van taal' kans op een prijs. Het is genomineerd voor de Language Industry Awards van De Taalsector én op de shortlist gezet!
Wil je dat ik win in de categorie 'beste boek', dan kun je ... 1/
Ah, nice! I hadn't seen his post. I'd call it '-mindedly' though.
25.02.2026 09:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There, they shifted a bit: the original and Low Saxon/German sound is what we in the Netherlands and Flanders would write with oe, so 'boeten'. In Flanders, this became an uu sound.
24.02.2026 20:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0