Olivia Hill

According to you. But not according to millions you allegedly want to vote for your war criminals.

Why yes if you put words in someone’s mouth you can assume all you want about their positions.

I’m told that never really happened and are Russian bots we should ignore because it’s inconvenient to the narrative.

Because that’s still not putting a line down on human rights.

Nobody votes because politicians are corrupt warmongering assholes. They perceive it as meaningless. The way to appeal to that isn’t to say “they’re 100% correct.”

Who will keynote the DNC?

I'm told those people are all demonstrably fake so we should pretend that our experiences are objectively incorrect and should be ignored.

If you think genocide is a point that can be compromised on, I'm not in some make believe "coalition" with you.

You're an existential threat to me and others and I'm not going to pretend you should be respected in polite society or ever taken seriously as an authority on anything.

I'm sorry but that's simply never worked. That just gets us a good candidate that the party ratfucks and then it destroys morale.

I don't know how old you are but I've seen this happen time and time again.

The entire media machine is hoisting him up the same way they've done numerous times before. I'm sorry but I've seen this pattern too many times to pretend it's a non-issue.

Well that's convenient.

Then this whole conversation is meaningless and unnecessary.

Those aren't the ones that react heavily when I say I am not voting for bigots. So I don't need to coddle them.

Yeah I've never once seen that approach result differently. Abject hostility. "Defeatism." "Russian spy." "BUT HE'S OUR ONLY HOPE."

Maybe we just exist in completely contrary circles. No idea.

Because if I say "but instead, try Pritzker," I will get EXACTLY the same response. Exactly.

I have seen this literally hundreds of times.

No. That's not true.

If we're saying "not this one because X, Y, and Z," it's abundantly clear who we'll compromise with. It's the people who haven't crossed those hard lines.

Nobody acting in good faith thinks otherwise.

I'm sorry, but the people we're talking about are threatening to rob us of civil rights.

I'm not going to be nicer to them than they are to us.

The “complex coalition” means you have to accept not only a candidate you think might be okay but also the one you just said would be terrible for the reasons you listed

Just a heads up if you do it the second way the responses will be that you’re not allowed to do that either

Yes Chris because the people that think "woke has gone too far" think powerful men should be able to fuck children.

We know this.

It's abundantly clear.

It's not about right and wrong. It's about POWER.

And until we interrogate our relationship to power, it will continue to happen this way.

I will say gently: every famous counter sit-in from the Civil Rights era was a crime.

Nonviolent civil disobedience is quite literally and explicitly a strategy where you commit crimes.

Fuck you we want them GONE.

NO. FUCKING. GESTAPO.

Period.

Fuck you we want them GONE.

NO. FUCKING. GESTAPO.

Period.

Zoe Quinn is the most vindicated person in modern history.

hey remember when I got shit on for years for trying to warn people that GamerGate was just Nazis and not just about harassing women and not just about some “consumer revolt”

Will Stancil is the model democrats. A conniving little weasel who is bound to be rewarded by the system he is pretending to subvert. Dude is gonna be funding ICE in 5 years.

But, like, without Tarantino's zionist shittiness!

Talk about a day one preorder.

Right?

Dr Jordan B Peterson @jordanbpeterson Go to hell you woke Virtue-signaling race-baiting Anti-science postmodern neo-Marxist Clickbait disseminating Bastards Pop Base @PopBase • 12h Today is Elmo's birthday. He turns 3½ years old every year.

It's Elmo's birthday