Niels Holtrop

Personalized Pricing and Consumer Welfare | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 131, No 1 We study the welfare implications of personalized pricing implemented with machine learning. We use data from a randomized controlled pricing field experiment to construct personalized prices and vali...

Resonates well with the findings of this paper: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...

This would indeed be huge! Been waiting nearly 20(!) years for the resolution of that cliffhanger.

I raise you with the fact that I had a job talk on the same day with someone else, and we even met and socialized in between our talks. (Neither of us accepted the offer, and we still talk to each other regularly)

Wow, great idea for a paper! Strong closing of 2024!

Thanks for making me aware this feed exists!

They should also set quality standards IMO (just looking for a reason to post this paper on eggs)

pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/...

We also identify product and category moderators that make these effects stronger or weaker. One favourite finding is that absence claims can still work, but only in categories where there’s fewer of them. So, low fat yoghurt is not special, but low sodium soup is.(3/3)

In a nutshell, we show that presence nutrition (e.g. high in fibre) increase SKU choice on average, but absence nutrition claims (e.g. low fat/sugar) decrease choice. Both claim types do impact quantity purchased however. (2/3)

The impact of nutrition claims on purchase behavior for food products Faced by increasing emphasis on health, manufacturers try to persuade consumers by using nutrition claims on their packaging. Although experimental re…

With so many people joining the platform, it might become time to post here as well. So, as a starter I’ll post my latest article:

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
(1/3)

Thanks @juliencloarec.com, this should help kickstart my algorithm!