@michaelwiebe.bsky.social
Economics (UBC), yimby, replication, effective altruism, data science.
Corinth and Irvine have an article on this. When market rents are cheaper, subsidies go further:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
2/
Great article by @helenl.bsky.social on non-market housing. One important point: demand for non-market housing is related to the supply of market housing.
1/
So these projects started pre-covid?
11.08.2025 17:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Noβwe need to go longer.
11.08.2025 17:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What caused the boom?
11.08.2025 15:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0For the same number of bedrooms, location, etc?
10.08.2025 23:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, something to indicate that the land has been upgraded to have more uses (ie building apartments).
10.08.2025 23:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Formal writeup here:
michaelwiebe.com/blog/2025/07...
3/3
The upzoned parcel itself increases in value, but this is irrelevant. What matters is that upzoning makes it easier to apartment-developers to acquire land: lower input costs = lower housing prices.
2/
Upzoning is like double musical chairs: it moves a chair (parcel) from the single-family game to the apartment game, making it easier for apartment-developers to get a chair.
And since apartments are a cheaper form of housing, this improves overall affordability.
1/
Let's talk about vacancy chains
bsky.app/profile/mich...
New project: I'm writing a literature review called Building Abundance on housing and infrastructure research.
First post is reviewing the literature on vacancy chains, link below.
Classic reasoning: "why should we build a bridge here? No one commutes here anyway"
06.08.2025 23:41 β π 25 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0First Shaughnessy has a floor space ratio of 0.25?!
bylaws.vancouver.ca/zoning/zonin...
When discussing reforms like multiplex zoning, demand estimates rarely enter the discussion (except as a force to be countered).
@lausterna.bsky.social and I think thatβs unfortunate and we run some simple estimates what it would look like to zone for the demand to live in an area.
How would you classify this argument?
"No to megatowers, yes to affordable housing"
youtu.be/pbQAr3K57WQ
Your argument is "that's liberal-nimbyism, not left-nimbyism"?
03.08.2025 20:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Maybe the issue is your idiosyncratic terminology.
03.08.2025 17:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Important point by @jensvb.bsky.social and @lausterna.bsky.social: when people move out to live on their own, their housing costs go up, but (by revealed preference) they are better off. Hence, housing costs alone are an incomplete picture.
doodles.mountainmath.ca/posts/2025-0...
Prop 13 again?
BC has assessments split by land and structures.
What if P(God will send you to hell for praying)>0?
29.07.2025 15:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do you think market rents are disconnected from, say, the top 10% of wages?
28.07.2025 20:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0But also, it was affordable before the current vacancy?
28.07.2025 15:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Did they actually make apartments feasible, or are there still regulations about height, setbacks, parking, etc that kill projects?
28.07.2025 00:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ok, so you're saying that no market-rate housing is affordable, no matter how old it is?
(Because when it is vacated, the landlord raises the rent above an affordable level)
Vacancy chains take 1-2 years. This is totally different from depreciation, where it takes decades for new housing to age and become cheap.
Markets have been blocked by zoning regulations. We need to max out on both market-rate housing and subsidized housing.
Have you seen this?
direct.mit.edu/rest/article...
You think the rent of old 3-storey walkup apartments is the same as the rent of new apartment buildings?
27.07.2025 20:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0