One train per hour intercity rail service between Oakland and Sacramento that is slower than driving is not a reasonable proxy for travel demand between Oakland and San Francisco faster than driving.
07.12.2025 03:33 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@dereksagehorn.bsky.social
Interested in figuring out how to build better housing, transit and cities. Construction lawyer for CAHSR; advocate for East Bay for Everyone. Oakland.
One train per hour intercity rail service between Oakland and Sacramento that is slower than driving is not a reasonable proxy for travel demand between Oakland and San Francisco faster than driving.
07.12.2025 03:33 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We need to stop assuming that the current demand for existing standard gauge rail service pattern, frequency or speed is indicative of what a future service could look like.
07.12.2025 03:28 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Shinbrush
07.12.2025 01:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I would watch a Joel Kotkin travel show where he goes to high growth, middle income East Asian metros and then explains why Americans donβt want or canβt have this.
06.12.2025 22:48 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It is pretty funny though that Kotkin has an unparalleled ability to get published consistently in prestigious American outlets by writing the same warmed over sprawl apologia but is only taken seriously in South Korea.
06.12.2025 22:45 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Reforming housing and transportation systems and institutions: Which strategy?
06.12.2025 22:16 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0photo of a bus schedule with generally 20 minute headways circled in red are several points per day at which the interval is a couple of minutes off 20
Whatβs going on here AC Transit?
06.12.2025 19:58 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0There are more standard gauge concepts here link21program.org/en/program/c...
06.12.2025 17:40 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Sure but you donβt have to use the existing Caltrain service concept. The point of the 2nd tube infrastructure is to allow new and different services that meet new travel demands.
06.12.2025 17:35 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0link21program.org/en/program/s...
06.12.2025 17:33 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A new service doesnβt have to be Caltrain or Amtrak.
It can be a higher frequency shorter service between Milbrae and Richmond/Coliseum.
@eean.dev
06.12.2025 15:43 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you see this, repost with your model of positive masculinity.
06.12.2025 02:04 β π 37 π 5 π¬ 0 π 4SPβs chief electrical engineer in 1911:
βelectrification of all lines around the Bayβ¦ is the ultimate purpose is all of the lines on both sides of the Bay. The 1st step is being made now; the other steps will follow as fast as the service conditions will warrant the expenditure of the necessary $."
Southern Pacificβs electrification & modernization of Oakland, Berkeley and Alameda suburban rail.
- 29 miles of upgrades
- 21 miles of extensions
- 7 year schedule
- standardized pole spacing and specs
- self built power generation
- budget from conceptual design to final acceptance $4m β> $10.5m
Resources on travel demand from Link21
link21program.org/en/program/m...
Transfers have gotten much better since 2015 and will get even better in 5 days.
05.12.2025 19:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Similar to assuming travel demand is limited to current demand for 52 minute bus service from Ocean Beach to Embarcadero.
05.12.2025 19:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Regional rail is a tech choice albeit one more conceptual than OCS/3rd rail/gauge.
I'm more interested in understanding the travel demand. 38 Geary runs articulated buses holding 120 people on 7.5 minute frequencies east of 32nd Avenue.
Is the goal to serve that demand faster or something else?
RER and Paris Metro provide different levels of service in terms of travel speeds, frequencies, stops, fares. They also have good transfers that allow people to use both.
Those are important details that will define the viability of improved Westside transit access.
So itβs BART technology or nothing? I donβt think thatβs a helpful way to approach service planning.
05.12.2025 16:54 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Perhaps β is regional rail only defined to only be 3rd rail, Indian gauge?
05.12.2025 16:41 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Agree 100 percent on this
05.12.2025 16:29 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No β the first question should be the service concept that meets the travel demand at a good value.
Focusing on the yard or agency or technology is exactly how weβve ended up with BART to SFO and the like.
Why would we make decisions about service based on who owns or doesnβt own yards? Thats entirely backwards
05.12.2025 15:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs remarkable β much of East and West Oakland havenβt had access to full service grocery stores for decades and meanwhile people in S.F. neighborhoods with multiple grocery store options nearby are upset they may lose access to one (1) store temporarily.
05.12.2025 15:36 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You donβt need a high operating cost technology with 3 or 4 TPH serving a couple of 700β long underground stations that cost $800m each to do this.
Everyone else is saying the correct answer which is an underground automated light metro.
> BART down Geary
Stick to food takes
my favourite part of getting a new Marco post is always the inspiringly well-made diagrams
05.12.2025 02:14 β π 26 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0