Indeed. Itβs also a consistent critique of the second wave from the very beginning. Suffragists and social reformers in the 19th and early 20th century also critiqued this dynamic.
25.11.2025 21:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@cwolbrecht.bsky.social
Political scientist @ Notre Dame. Gender, parties, suffrage, role models. New: See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People. https://bookshop.org/p/books/see-jane-run-how-women-politicians-matter-for-young-people-david-e-campbell/21729443
Indeed. Itβs also a consistent critique of the second wave from the very beginning. Suffragists and social reformers in the 19th and early 20th century also critiqued this dynamic.
25.11.2025 21:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Look, women no longer do shit for free is actually at the root of a lot of social disruption. The question is whether you think the solution is women going back to being unpaid and unprotected by their own labor.
25.11.2025 19:34 β π 199 π 38 π¬ 4 π 4And my husband--the only one of us who reads the local paper--tells me! It's called delegation, and is a sign of intelligence and sophistication.
25.11.2025 19:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Why? Even without the vote, women were politically active in movements and groups. They had access to political information through the press, conversation, and their own lived experience--who better to know about inflation than the person who does all the household shopping?
25.11.2025 19:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Look, I'll take cites wherever I can find them.
25.11.2025 19:04 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You're the best, Nathan! Kevin and I talk about this explicitly in A Century of Votes for Women. I love the quote from CE Ladd especially.
25.11.2025 18:56 β π 12 π 1 π¬ 1 π 1People knew this at the time that those classics were being written! This is the New York Times in 1956:
25.11.2025 18:53 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 0 π 1Indeed!
25.11.2025 18:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is the only gift my husband wants, ever.
25.11.2025 17:21 β π 18 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0BE A MINDFUL CONSUMER IN THE ATTENTION ECONOMY
25.11.2025 17:00 β π 93 π 22 π¬ 2 π 1Their key evidence is that husbands & wives tend to vote the same way. One explanation is men instruct. Another is that marriage is predicted by factors (e.g., educ, religion, etc) which also predict vote choice.
My husband & I always vote the same. Should we conclude that he tells me how to vote?
I am saying that none of these social scientists collected data that can test those claims. E.g., they did not ask husbands if they told their wives how to vote, or vice versa. Some men might have told their wives how to vote, but we cannot determine if and how widespread from their research.
25.11.2025 16:54 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 1 π 1The conventional wisdom for decades has been that women were in fact more likely than men to support conservative parties after suffrage. @teele.bsky.social and Evelyne Brie have a paper challenging that conclusion: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
25.11.2025 16:49 β π 8 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0I can't find it rn, but there's an interesting paper on the impact of this dynamic in Latin America. The Catholic church believed women would vote for them/their parties, but advocating for suffrage was contrary to the traditional gender roles they favored.
25.11.2025 16:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0what a bad ass
25.11.2025 16:29 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Where's @nathankalmoe.bsky.social's meme for THIS?
25.11.2025 16:20 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I don't know. It will never happen, but I might like to be called "unfailingly elegant" in my obit. One of you make sure that happens.
25.11.2025 16:16 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think the original vote studies are AMAZING. They got so much right, stuff that remains right TODAY. But they read their data through the lenses of their own biases and assumptions. We're probably doing more than a little of that ourselves...
25.11.2025 16:07 β π 25 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Women *were* more likely to talk to a family member about politics than men were. Does that necessarily mean husbands told them how to vote? If you don't work outside of the home, the probability that your discussion partner on any issue is a family member is high.
25.11.2025 16:06 β π 18 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Our great pioneers of the scientific study of mass behavior didn't have much evidence to support their confident conclusions.
25.11.2025 16:04 β π 24 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0To be fair, Converse at least didn't think very highly of most people's political competence.
25.11.2025 16:00 β π 13 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Today is a good day to remind you that none of the classic vote studies thought very highly of women's political competence.
25.11.2025 15:57 β π 118 π 35 π¬ 11 π 6Two things from the obit:
Maybe she didn't have a PhD, but she published a book and scientific papers in journals.
Her Michigan colleagues describe her as "as bright and intellectually gifted as they come" and also "an unfailingly elegant person."
MORE RECEIPTS.
isr.umich.edu/news-events/...
RECEIPTS.
25.11.2025 15:53 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I mean, he said women lacked the sophistication to understand political issues to the extent their husbands did while married to a pollster with a PhD.
25.11.2025 15:47 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0Ken.
25.11.2025 15:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Delete all apps immediately.
25.11.2025 01:36 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It just oozes Cold War.
24.11.2025 18:52 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For about 10 years I regularly walked through this building (to get out of the cold) and not once was I bitten by a radioactive spider. Disappointed.
24.11.2025 18:43 β π 16 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0