Rustconf when it was in Montreal (local to me) had special priced tickets for locals ($50 IIRC). There aren’t for Seattle?
18.07.2025 22:36 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@strings.io.bsky.social
Founder and CTO at Fly.io
Rustconf when it was in Montreal (local to me) had special priced tickets for locals ($50 IIRC). There aren’t for Seattle?
18.07.2025 22:36 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Nice. Do you happen to know why it’s comparing to s3fs instead of something like juicefs, geesefs or tigrisfs? I assumed s3fs was antiquated and not used very much.
14.07.2025 23:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0JFC this bug. fly.io/blog/parking...
28.05.2025 22:31 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1My first reaction is that it’s not really embedded if it uses Postgres :) but maybe a good Postgres setup is what’s expected. If it used SQLite or fjall or another embeddable DB, you could get rid of that dependency.
28.05.2025 11:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0I’ve only discovered its existence this week and it’s solving a lot of problems for me. Previously tried axum+utoipa and dropshot. Both solutions had their own issues where poem seems to just work and be flexible enough for my needs!
22.05.2025 10:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I realized something recently, which is that we're building AI tools completely backwards.
While I was aware that there's some de-skilling happening already, I finally clicked a bunch of pieces together and decided to write this to talk about how we can do *better*
hazelweakly.me/blog/stop-bu...
unsynn v0.1.0 is out!
crates.io/crates/unsynn
What the…
26.04.2025 22:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If I understand correctly, their software requires generating Rust code from SQL. Instead of making it all one big crate, they splitted it into a ton of crates. They are not publishing the crates, they’re only generated at build-time for specific uses of Feldera
18.04.2025 14:28 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Peter Cai, on our proxy team, working with Pavel to track down an annoying async Rust bug. fly.io/blog/taming-...
27.02.2025 00:16 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0That part is very interesting to me! I’ll definitely take a look.
14.01.2025 01:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hmmm, I like that! What names do you usually use for labels?
12.01.2025 12:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Err… `#[serde(skip_serializing)]`
28.12.2024 15:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hmm, maybe `#[serde(skip_serialization)]` on the field would give you what you want?
28.12.2024 15:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That said, I’m not opposed to jumping through the hoops and learning new ways, but I was hoping for something that worked out of the box :)
09.11.2024 22:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Very interested by this.
Up to now I’ve been able to evaluate Rhai scripts inside a hyperlight VM, but nothing more complex.
Wasmtime requires jumping through hoops to get working no_std. Most things with C dependencies are hard to compile for the x86_64-unknown-none.
Was very interested in that feature and ended up implementing it for fun. Didn’t turn out too bad!
20.10.2024 15:00 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Without foreign key constraints, then you’re implementing it yourself, yeah :( might be good to take that into account when designing the keys you’re using so you can iterate on them. E.g. `device_id:message_id` or the reverse.
14.10.2024 23:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Let me know if you do! Happy to chat about it.
27.09.2024 15:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If your transactions don't overlap, then this is definitely faster than single writer tx. If they do cause conflicts due to the aforementioned reason, you can decide what to do depending on what you're trying to do. Definitely not a silver bullet heh.
27.09.2024 14:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That's correct! Using the `single_writer_tx` means each writer transaction happen one at a time. Using `ssi_tx` (introduced by this PR), you can have any number at the same time, but they can fail (retryable) if a transaction inserts data that was read by another committed previously.
27.09.2024 14:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0If you’re still using fjall and need transactions, this might interest you: github.com/fjall-rs/fja...
27.09.2024 14:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A tweet of the OP followed by a picture of a bodega cat on an ATM machine
ATM surveillance
05.04.2024 03:52 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Tasted great for 10 seconds!
02.03.2024 14:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0If you see this, post 🐈
05.02.2024 12:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0