Per Engzell's Avatar

Per Engzell

@pengzell.bsky.social

Interested in how the rich stay rich and the poor poor. Sociologist at @sriucl.bsky.social @ucl.ac.uk. He/him/his. http://perengzell.com Photo bomber @simoneschneider.bsky.social

11,059 Followers  |  9,222 Following  |  3,345 Posts  |  Joined: 01.07.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Per Engzell (@pengzell.bsky.social)

Thinking about it now, I wonder if the neighbours were Germans?

09.03.2026 18:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Although back in Sweden when my friend was keeping a piano in his student flat I was equally delighted to find the neighbours' wifi named ThatPianoManSureIsLoud

09.03.2026 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

True. Stayed with friends in Berlin recently and was delighted to use their WIFI@DB_Lounge. Premium experience at home.

09.03.2026 18:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
THIS LAND IS THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
THERE IS NO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR ENTRY
STUDENTS, STAFF AND VISITORS MUST COMPLY WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON'S VISITOR REGULATIONS AND, IF YOU DO NOT, THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON RESERVES ITS RIGHTS UNDER THE VISITOR REGULATIONS INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ASK YOU TO LEAVE THE LAND.

THIS LAND IS THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THERE IS NO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR ENTRY STUDENTS, STAFF AND VISITORS MUST COMPLY WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON'S VISITOR REGULATIONS AND, IF YOU DO NOT, THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON RESERVES ITS RIGHTS UNDER THE VISITOR REGULATIONS INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ASK YOU TO LEAVE THE LAND.

Well actually…

09.03.2026 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If I had a tuppence for every Italian economist working in the UK, I would be a rich man.

09.03.2026 14:52 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting that they seem to find opposite results? Between the two, 'cloudiness increases the appeal of academic activities' definitely feels like more of a post hoc...

09.03.2026 14:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We have a new blogpost on What will the paper of the future look like?

What if research papers stopped being static PDFs and became closer to software?

09.03.2026 13:05 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

About five years ago, I remember a colleague passionately arguing we need pre-registered seeds. Starting to think they were right...

09.03.2026 10:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Part of the beauty of academic writing is that it's modular: you can get the gist from the abstract, and choose to deep dive into whichever part is relevant for you.

09.03.2026 09:59 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

On the one hand, yes. On the other, it feels like the time when we would read full papers from start to finish was gone long before LLMs, if such a time ever existed.

09.03.2026 09:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah that's the question. On the one hand, you'd imagine that LLMs would free up more time to explore data, go down alternative paths etc. On the other, it doesn't feel to me like that is happening? I can't say why though

09.03.2026 09:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That's another aspect of this: the equivalent of Claude has always existed, for people at well-resourced research unis with an endless supply of research assistants...

09.03.2026 09:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We often treat education as the primary engine of social mobility, but conventional models may be overestimating its impact.

Not correcting for selection into schooling will artificially inflate any indirect effect through schooling...

1/3

#socialmobility #sociology

09.03.2026 09:45 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

There’s something obviously alienating about that in a simple Marxian sense, and it's not hard to spot the parallels with earlier waves of automation. /end

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Last thought: feels like we haven't yet grasped the psychological and social consequences of researchers going from being workers to being managers of research production. 11/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

If you've ever spent a day researching a paragraph that later ends up a footnote, that later ends up cut... can you honestly say you've never regretted it? 10/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The fact that writing sprawls out in all directions at first *feels* like an important part of the thought process. That seems right, but is it always so? 9/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Another difference: an LLM writes exactly what is required and nothing more. Normally writing starts with an excess of text and results, before you start pruning it down. 8/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The idea in this case is good. But it's still the kind of project where you might once have thought: interesting result, but not quite worth a whole paper. 7/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Part of what makes the paper 'feel LLM' is we're not used to seeing full papers on ideas that might be interesting but not necessarily enough so to justify the writing effort. 6/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Before LLMs, you might spend a couple of hours exploring a throwaway result. But it would rarely feel worth the effort to write the whole paper. I wonder if that might change now. 5/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s obvious that newer models got better at coding. But they’ve also become better at writing, especially adapting tone to a specific field, journal, or even author. 4/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Eerily this *felt* distinctly like other papers written by the same person, as something they might plausibly have produced - which is also exactly what makes it feel LLM. 3/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This was a short paper proving a basic point - incrementally important but perhaps not enough so to justify the high opportunity cost of writing a full paper pre-LLM. 2/

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Another colleague shared a complete, and by all accounts sound, empirical paper written by LLM, with some prompting. Some thoughts (and some of you will be sick of hearing this by now)… 1/n

09.03.2026 09:44 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Published is another matter...

09.03.2026 06:39 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

One potential upside as the cost of writing a paper goes to zero: null results might finally get written up

09.03.2026 06:34 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

After 5 years I can finally share a full WP of our project conducting cognitive interviews of life satisfaction reporting.

Main findings:
1. LS scales are psychometrically valid, but...
2. Standard statistical assumptions made when analysing LS data are not credible.

osf.io/gv5e3/files/...

26.01.2026 08:38 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 4
OSF

When you collect data online, are the results from humans or AI? In a project led by Booth PhD student Grace Zhang, we estimate the prevalence of AI agents on commonly used survey platforms:
osf.io/preprints/ps...
🧡

07.03.2026 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 107    πŸ” 50    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 3

Good shout out! (Btw half of the authors overlap and everyone is in the same department so I think George knows...)

07.03.2026 11:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0