About five years ago, I remember a colleague passionately arguing we need pre-registered seeds. Starting to think they were right...
09.03.2026 10:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0About five years ago, I remember a colleague passionately arguing we need pre-registered seeds. Starting to think they were right...
09.03.2026 10:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Part of the beauty of academic writing is that it's modular: you can get the gist from the abstract, and choose to deep dive into whichever part is relevant for you.
09.03.2026 09:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0On the one hand, yes. On the other, it feels like the time when we would read full papers from start to finish was gone long before LLMs, if such a time ever existed.
09.03.2026 09:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah that's the question. On the one hand, you'd imagine that LLMs would free up more time to explore data, go down alternative paths etc. On the other, it doesn't feel to me like that is happening? I can't say why though
09.03.2026 09:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That's another aspect of this: the equivalent of Claude has always existed, for people at well-resourced research unis with an endless supply of research assistants...
09.03.2026 09:52 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
We often treat education as the primary engine of social mobility, but conventional models may be overestimating its impact.
Not correcting for selection into schooling will artificially inflate any indirect effect through schooling...
1/3
#socialmobility #sociology
Thereβs something obviously alienating about that in a simple Marxian sense, and it's not hard to spot the parallels with earlier waves of automation. /end
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0Last thought: feels like we haven't yet grasped the psychological and social consequences of researchers going from being workers to being managers of research production. 11/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0If you've ever spent a day researching a paragraph that later ends up a footnote, that later ends up cut... can you honestly say you've never regretted it? 10/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0The fact that writing sprawls out in all directions at first *feels* like an important part of the thought process. That seems right, but is it always so? 9/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Another difference: an LLM writes exactly what is required and nothing more. Normally writing starts with an excess of text and results, before you start pruning it down. 8/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The idea in this case is good. But it's still the kind of project where you might once have thought: interesting result, but not quite worth a whole paper. 7/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Part of what makes the paper 'feel LLM' is we're not used to seeing full papers on ideas that might be interesting but not necessarily enough so to justify the writing effort. 6/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Before LLMs, you might spend a couple of hours exploring a throwaway result. But it would rarely feel worth the effort to write the whole paper. I wonder if that might change now. 5/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs obvious that newer models got better at coding. But theyβve also become better at writing, especially adapting tone to a specific field, journal, or even author. 4/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Eerily this *felt* distinctly like other papers written by the same person, as something they might plausibly have produced - which is also exactly what makes it feel LLM. 3/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This was a short paper proving a basic point - incrementally important but perhaps not enough so to justify the high opportunity cost of writing a full paper pre-LLM. 2/
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Another colleague shared a complete, and by all accounts sound, empirical paper written by LLM, with some prompting. Some thoughts (and some of you will be sick of hearing this by now)β¦ 1/n
09.03.2026 09:44 β π 8 π 4 π¬ 1 π 1Published is another matter...
09.03.2026 06:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0One potential upside as the cost of writing a paper goes to zero: null results might finally get written up
09.03.2026 06:34 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0
After 5 years I can finally share a full WP of our project conducting cognitive interviews of life satisfaction reporting.
Main findings:
1. LS scales are psychometrically valid, but...
2. Standard statistical assumptions made when analysing LS data are not credible.
osf.io/gv5e3/files/...
When you collect data online, are the results from humans or AI? In a project led by Booth PhD student Grace Zhang, we estimate the prevalence of AI agents on commonly used survey platforms:
osf.io/preprints/ps...
π§΅
Good shout out! (Btw half of the authors overlap and everyone is in the same department so I think George knows...)
07.03.2026 11:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Excited to share new work with Yaming Cao @zew.de and @kayaez.bsky.social @cu-cardiffbusiness.bsky.social published in Labour Economics! Students with gritty peers in high school are more likely to succeed in the labor market. Gritty peers are pivotal for #FirstGen students. doi.org/10.1016/j.la...
07.03.2026 11:05 β π 15 π 5 π¬ 4 π 0My department really needs to stop hiring philosophy professors, we can't even stop the ones we have from posting on BlueSky
06.03.2026 19:53 β π 16 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0
It goes like this the merge, the fix
A set of dummies does the trick
Dragon Ball Z meme: It's over 9000!!!!
When people ask me what my article's word count is
06.03.2026 22:42 β π 58 π 8 π¬ 1 π 0I love it when people explain basic LLM/AI stuff to me, it just gives me the standpoint to be an even better ally to women
06.03.2026 20:29 β π 30 π 3 π¬ 4 π 0A person with a microphone saying β because I think that something awaits me in the divine for resistingβ
Them: why do you keep calling yourself a βstatisticianβ instead of a βdata scientistβ
Me:
Nothing accelerates theoretical clarity like a dataset that refuses to cooperate
06.03.2026 14:11 β π 19 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0