This is good I think.
20.02.2026 06:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@jamierisner.bsky.social
MEP Design - Arup - Decarbonisation - Heat Pumps - Co-operator - Cycling - Sheffield - Passivhaus - Decentralisation of Power - ⚔️
This is good I think.
20.02.2026 06:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Since the takeover?
20.02.2026 05:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0God it's embarrassing
12.02.2026 10:08 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Strong correlation between flags and incedibly sad high streets in S Yorkshire.
11.02.2026 13:54 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Welcome to Decline" -- still one of my favourite graphs from last year. In the late 1970s, Britain's economic fate very clearly split in two. How much you blame Thatcher will depend on your politics, but her leadership is useful to understand the timing. tomforth.co.uk/welcometodec...
02.01.2026 18:15 — 👍 54 🔁 32 💬 4 📌 5How to win a time war
02.01.2026 22:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's ehat happens everywhere else in the world, including london
28.12.2025 18:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ah how dull, if you won't read or listen what's the point.
I keep saying, they're not making that case. I am. If the powers were available, they would just use them and Westminster would have nothing to do with it
Creating a more effective local funding system | Centre for Cities share.google/UJD9LUYUe9Te...
I think CfC has good proposals on this. As I said, WY is not making the case
Well right now they can't have either, and only local powers have any certainty attached.
Depending on Westminster whims is incredibly bad for business, and has resulted in lots of studies and no metro
Then they won't use those powers, no problem. Let them decide
28.12.2025 17:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Just let W. Yorkshire decide 😂
They clearly think it's something worth doing, let them make the compromises between cost and quality needed.
We should, as most of the rest of Europe do. It's not even devolution of funding, it's devolution of tax/borrowing powers
28.12.2025 17:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But they do suggest local taxes in that report 😁
I wouldn't be making the case if I was them to introduce new powers, but if those powers existed they would 100% be using them instead of gambling on Westminster approval
Tram_Report_Digital.pdf share.google/CDYDjVblMj59...
It's a simpler ask than "please reform all local government funding mechanisms"...
It was the right decision to remove victorian trams, also right to build modern systems now... just let cities raise taxes locally
28.12.2025 17:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It would self fund if it could, but does not have the power to do so
28.12.2025 17:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Can you explain more about this - what election?
28.12.2025 17:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0They can't pay for it because they can't levy taxes or take out bonds
28.12.2025 17:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The whole point is just let Leeds raise its own taxes to pay for it 🙄
28.12.2025 17:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That's just so self fulfilling though
28.12.2025 17:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think that's just because of the current incentives, there are no benefits to councils of building
28.12.2025 17:08 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0People who live in London decide 🤷♂️
28.12.2025 17:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That is the one small lever they have 🤷♂️
More importantly, it has minimal incentives or opportunities to raise taxes
I don't think so if the incentives were right. They currently want to build lots
28.12.2025 17:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 01.85 million people in the Glasgow metropolitan area.
We're pissed off that London decides who has metros. Just let Leeds decide what they build in Leeds etc 🤷♂️
No, but the design is standardised across all stations
28.12.2025 10:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Except the reason they evolve isn't much to do with positive outcomes. See centralisation of power in the UK... It's clear to see why it happened and why it's not changing.
28.12.2025 08:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's the free market/evolution, good stuff rises up 🤷♂️
You are missing out on a world of incredibly good quality science education content
Just ignore the algorithm and use the subscribe feed 🤷♀️
27.12.2025 22:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0