Similar in Spain, the people who fly them out their windows are generally right wing haters
08.10.2025 06:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@abogger.bsky.social
Euro vagabond. Sun sea and mountain worshipper. non dm'er!
Similar in Spain, the people who fly them out their windows are generally right wing haters
08.10.2025 06:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm living outside the country feeling how unfair it is that us emigrants can vote on nothing. Especially re president, to make sure this nasty woman doesn't get in...what a beech.
06.10.2025 17:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That area was the first place butchers aprons went up around Brighton recently π€¨
05.10.2025 18:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Playground #fox hung about for 15 minutes, with kids going crazy around it! A big row broke out between a bizzy body woman and some of the older kids...she was trying to scare it away while they chanted ' leave the fox alone'! They fed it the end of their crisp packet π¦. A bit too familiar?
05.10.2025 17:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Beautiful π
05.10.2025 16:32 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Free Greta Thunberg and the rest of the illegally detained flotilla activists.
04.10.2025 22:12 β π 23692 π 7940 π¬ 449 π 231This morning on La Rambla, the yearly floral decorations by the guild of florists.
04.10.2025 12:06 β π 62 π 15 π¬ 2 π 1To Gaza with love.
Latest update from Global Sumud Flotilla.
Might be worth mentioning, for those considering using Betterhelp for therapy for various reasons (ease of access, cost etc), please know that they will ignore your request to connect you with an LGBT friendly therapist, and also they will sell your sensitive data to meta, and other advertisers...
29.09.2025 09:28 β π 102 π 22 π¬ 3 π 0this poster also implies that its mostly the parents fault in particular the mothers as shes usually the main educator at home....other aspects play a huge role eg. society at large, social media, peer pressure....but lets just say its all mamas fault...funny that, sexist advice from a sexist world
29.09.2025 08:33 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Ur right...we're way in over our headsπ€¦π»ββοΈ
28.09.2025 09:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0UK: 'I'm heartbroken kids racially abused me on train'
Sophia Choudry said she was repeatedly called the P-word on 7 September on a journey from Paddington to Maidenhead.
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Perfect. John Fugelsang is my hero.
28.09.2025 02:21 β π 687 π 198 π¬ 32 π 5F**k all these ignorant eediots
28.09.2025 07:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So terrifying
28.09.2025 07:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Really, people who are still on the fence, need to move their arses π‘
28.09.2025 07:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I wanted to take the opportunity to clarify my reasons for cancelling my membership of Labour Women's Network. When I joined LWN at Conference last year, I took particular care to check the constitution to ensure that trans women were accepted. As a proud trans ally, I firmly believe that trans women are women and that there is no such thing as a women's group that excludes trans women. I was pleased to see that LWN was open to all who self-define as women, and as such was happy to join the organisation. I was disappointed by the statement released in May that LWN would be identifying women as only "biological women", however I noted that this was a temporary position. I ran for a place on the Executive Committee to give those members who feel that trans women should be welcomed and supported within LWN an opportunity to speak. The cancellation of my membership is not due to my lack of success in that election, but due to the change in constitution. I cannot see any reason for this change of constitution than to actively exclude trans women from the group. I made trans inclusivity the centre of my pitch to the executive committee because I feel passionately that LWN could be truly progressive in finding a way for trans women to be included in women's spaces. Indeed, the previous wording in the constitution did this perfectly, making it clear that anyone who identifies as a woman could be a member. There is no legal challenge to this. The Supreme Court and EHRC guidance do not force any organisation to be trans-exclusionary. Transphobia remains a choice - a choice that LWN has deliberately made.
This change of constitution does not clarify the situation. If anything, it makes it more vague and down to interpretation. The very concept of "biological woman" which LWN claims will be the basis for the new constitution is spurious and I wonder how LWN is planning to monitor this. Will all members have to do DNA tests before joining? | suspect some members may be in for a shock if you did this! Should it be judged on hormone levels? Are trans men now permitted to join LWN on the basis of their birth certificate? The concept of "biological women" is anti-feminist and rooted in misogyny, and it is frankly disgraceful that a woman's organisation has chosen to use such horrifying language. My identity as a woman has nothing to do with my biology or anatomy, and I will not be a part of an organisation which thinks of women in such a degrading manner. This does not reduce the risk of legal challenge to LWN; if anything, it increases it. The EHRC guidance is only interim at this stage, and this change seems premature given pending legal challenges. Trans people still have human rights, and the Equality Act 2010 still offers them protection from discrimination. Trans women pose no threat to cisgender women within LWN. They do not possess any advantage; in reality, they face increased discrimination and need additional support to achieve fair representation within our elected bodies. It is hypocritical for LWN to claim that they "reject transphobia" while proposing and voting through an amendment that is intrinsically transphobic. This amendment has only one purpose - to exclude trans women from LWN.
One final thought. I did not feel able to speak at the AGM on this matter. Me, a cisgender woman, silenced by women. I never feel silenced in a room full of men, but I felt uncomfortable and unable to speak truth to power in that forum. That is the society that transphobic women are creating right now, one where cis women who are inclusive of our trans sisters are silenced. I'm sure the more transphobic members of LWN will be delighted to hear this, but is that really the world that LWN strives for? One where women's voices are only heard if they align with a far-right agenda? Follow the money that is currently making scapegoats of trans people, and you will see it's the same money that is making scapegoats of refugees and asylum seekers. These same people are already infringing on women's rights in the USA, and they will seek to do the same in the UK. If that is who LWN chooses to align with, that is the choice of LWN. It is a choice that does not align with Labour values, is anti-feminist and anti-equality. I will not be a part of it. Kind Regards, Felicity Pryke
I needed to think carefully about how to word this.
Labour Womenβs Network used to allow anyone who identified as a woman. They have changed the wording to simply βwomenβ and stated this means βbiological women.β
Labour Womenβs Network is a transphobic organisation and I will not be party of it.
Omg....I used to drink there in the 90s...had completely forgot about it π
26.09.2025 21:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Heartbreaking doesn't begin to sum this up...absolute cretins
26.09.2025 18:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The @elegraph Farage claims migrants are eating swans in Royal Parks Reform UK leader's accusations immediately rebuffed by Royal Parks charity IBC
Iβve heard it say that Nigel Farage has no less than seventeen nipples spread over his chest and back.
Iβm, of course, not saying itβs true, but we have no evidence saying otherwise.
It could be true, we just donβt know.
Thatβs how this works, right?
Feck you Isrehell
25.09.2025 09:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Since winning the election in July 2024, Starmer has tacked sharply to the right on a range of issues." on.ft.com/42OJw3T
25.09.2025 05:11 β π 255 π 61 π¬ 18 π 5the state of her....π«£
25.09.2025 09:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I've just used Good Law Project's tool to let Virgin Active know they're following transphobes, not the law. You can do it too here: goodlaw.social/638d25
25.09.2025 09:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Two tweets by Keir Starmer, one saying: Real patriotism means building a country where everyone feels safe, valued and respected. We choose hope over fear, and renewal over decline. The other saying: Iβm focused on real, workable solutions to tackle illegal immigration. Not gimmicks. Returning people with no right to be here, seizing hundreds of boats and working with international partners to smash the gangs. That's how we are securing our borders.
Five hours apart
25.09.2025 06:28 β π 460 π 142 π¬ 28 π 14Speaking of voices under attackβ¦can we be just as loud about Black journalists and comedians who are silenced, even by our so-called liberal outlets.
β’ Joy Reid
β’ Don Lemon
β’ Melissa Harris-Perry
β’ Tiffany Cross
β’ Jemele Hill
β’ Marc Lamont Hill
β’ Karen Attiah
β’ Amber Ruffin
Exactly...very disappointing
24.09.2025 20:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is how you begin to heal ppl
This is a very human act
When I hear of things like this, it reminds me there are still many decent ppl around who only want to live their best life and co-exist with their friends and neighbours respectfully
We aren't perfect, but we can improve a little every day
Wtafπ€¦π»ββοΈ
24.09.2025 06:01 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Great news!!
23.09.2025 21:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0