Al Morris

The sanctity of the quiet coach is being violated and it gets so deeply under my skin

Sadly, this is NOT satire.

As a man who drinks far too much I am firmly of the view 5p a drink isn't touching the sides even over the course of the year and it coming by making more children destitute is most definitely not worth paying.

Most of Epstein’s victims were either too frightened to come forward, or silenced through legal threats. Oh, and here’s a senior British politician giving Epstein tips on how to silence them

Crying at the football seeing Konate score, all his boys rushing to him including Allison doing the whole length of the pitch. Love these lads

It’s insane how much this is it

remember when the panama papers came out and we found out every rich person on earth was committing tax fraud and then nothing happened

So will a single journalist ask Trump about all the super fucked up accusations from the latest Epstein release or will they just keep letting him shit himself and shout about Clinton(s)?

What is rarely acknowledged is that these people are just fundamentally dull human beings.

Obsessed with money, status and fashion but utterly devoid of charm or intellect or even a sense of humour.

A Zoolander 2 White House.

A screenshot from the Graham Linehan Facebook page, dated January 26, 2017. "Here's something to watch for: sub-par entertainers/hacks etc smelling that sweet right wing sucker money and making their move."

Nine years to the day since Graham Linehan foresaw his own fate.

I already agree with this in principle - citizenship is an untouchable status or it is nothing - but also for reasons of prudence. “The Home Sec can revoke citizenship when he/she deems someone’s online output sufficiently offensive” is a v dangerous precedent to set with Reform leading all polls.

We could do with a PMQ, actually. Does the Right Honourable Member agree with me that the use of strategic litigation funded by billionaires to force organisations to exclude trans people is abhorrent and against both the principles of the Equality Act and words of the Supreme Court judges? Etc

Screenshot of a headline reading: "Refugees' jewellery could be seized to pay for asylum costs, says Home Office minister."

This is a new low from a govt plumbing the depths of performative cruelty in hopes that the public won’t notice they have no answers to the real issues facing this country

A sensible, humane govt would focus on safe routes to prevent people making dangerous small boat crossings

Vote Labour

If we can pair that with an actual political win that you can get on board with in NY then it could be a pretty lovely Tuesday thank you very much

I love watching Liverpool when they’re on it and this feels like one of those nights

The first thing Yaxley-Lennon did on leaving court was to thank Elon Musk for funding his legal costs.

That's Elon Musk who has repeatedly called for civil war in the UK.

As of typing this - all of the major politicians and platforms maintain a presence on X and it is time for them all to leave.

Here we go

Is it really *that hard* to say that it is totally morally wrong to say to people who have come here legally, worked, paid taxes, built their lives here, contributed to Britain, that they have to fuck off now, rather than "unfunded".

Main takeaways from tonight 1) fuck your racism, stay out of Anfield and football 2) I love Mo and the Diogo grief will hit more often than we imagine at unexpected times 3) so happy for Chiesa, he seems like a nice, excited lad 4) Ekitike is going to be great fun

the left must understand that prime ministers only do this when they're very distressed

NYC Mass Shooting Was Nearly Impossible to Prevent, Experts Say

Holy shit, they did it. They wrote the headline.

Imagine a world where you have to airdrop aid and rescue starving children from a situation an allied nation has created, whilst simultaneously supplying them arms and twisting yourself in political knots about whether or not to condemn them for it.

You don't actually have to imagine it, kids.

Reeves says rules and red tape are ‘boot on the neck’ of business At the Mansion House dinner she calls for regulators to allow more risk to clear the way for economic growth

Cutting "red tape" (aka public protections), as Reeves is doing, does not save money. Instead, it transfers costs from the rich to the poor. Other people pay for financial recklessness, filthy rivers, air pollution, lax building standards and consumer rip-offs.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

I'm old enough to remember when the Prime Minister felt it was important to give us a running commentary of his thoughts on the entire Glastonbury lineup

Unfortunately, with this Labour government you really have to accept that they’re not here to do anything more than make tweaks to what was already there. We need something completely different and if you still believe that we don’t, we just need the right people in charge of the system, sorry, no.

I don’t understand Yvette Cooper’s moral universe where we are supposed to feel more threatened by protesters spray painting war planes than our own government’s steadfast support of a regime who everyday find more horrendous ways to murder people .

If you are too young to remember the Iraq War, you'll hear "no one protested" and "no one knew they were lying." Millions of people knew they were lying and protested. The press not only did not want a record of mass dissent; they did not want a record of mass knowledge of lies.

i love it when dogs do this

Maryanne back on 6music for less than five minutes and she’s got us Deftones I love her so much