Some of the scholars mentioned in this article have presented at The International Memory Reading Group that @jonathannajenson.bsky.social and I run: sites.google.com/view/memoryr...
31.07.2025 16:06 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@jonathannajenson.bsky.social
Philosophy of neuroscience and memory. Engrams, synapses, mechanisms, and cognitive maps. Minerva postdoc at Bochum. https://sites.google.com/view/jonathan-najenson/home
Some of the scholars mentioned in this article have presented at The International Memory Reading Group that @jonathannajenson.bsky.social and I run: sites.google.com/view/memoryr...
31.07.2025 16:06 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0IPM 4.5 starting now!
22.05.2025 07:11 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0IPM 4.5 starts Thursday!
19.05.2025 08:04 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Don't forget IPM4.5 is coming up next week!
14.05.2025 05:02 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π¨Coming up soon on May 22β23: the Philosophy of Memory Early Career Online Conference (IPM 4.5)! Amazing lineup of speakers, with each early-career talk followed by commentary.
Program and connection details here: phomo.org/events/ipm4-5
Join us online on May 22β23 for the Philosophy of Memory Early Career Online Conference (IPM 4.5)
25.04.2025 12:59 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Michael Friedman, Suppes Professor of Philosophy of Science, Stanford University (1947-2025)
I regret to information the Bluesky philosophy community that Michael Friedman, noted philosopher of science and ground-breaking historian of Kant, neo-Kantianism, and logical positivism has died. May his memory be a blessing. #philsci
26.03.2025 01:24 β π 201 π 42 π¬ 7 π 24Thanks for the shout-out, Nir!
15.03.2025 16:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0'Engrams and causal specificity' has now been published in Philosophical Psychology
14.03.2025 08:05 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1Deadline extended! Submit to #IPM4.5 by March 15th
25.02.2025 08:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Kinda like computational modeling π
18.02.2025 15:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π¨ Final call for #IPM4.5! Join us on 22β23 May for a new format: an early-career researcher's talk followed by a commentary from an established researcher. We invite early career researchers to submit abstracts by 1 March.
Submit here:
π forms.gle/J6RdzD3qdvdP...
More generally, we believe this kind of design shows that time is of the essence! Cool insights into the dynamics of cognitive control pop up when you bring participants back for multiple sessions. Huge thanks to my collaborators Rut ZaksβOhayon, Yossi Tzelgov, and the incredible Nir Fresco! (fin)
27.01.2025 11:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Surprisingly, the impact of task conflict didnβt increase with practiceβperformance gains were similar after the first session. We think task conflict is strongest when the conflict is novel. (5/n)
27.01.2025 11:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We found that repeating the task over consecutive sessions and across weeks improved response times in both congruent and incongruent trials, but the effect persisted. So, while you do get faster, overcoming interference from the sensory and semantic informational conflict doesnβt go away (4/n)
27.01.2025 11:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Beyond the informational conflict in Stroop stimuli, we manipulated task conflict by varying the proportion of word vs. non-word stimuli like ####. A higher proportion of non-word stimuli is thought to create greater task conflict, leading to higher expected interference with task stimuli (3/n)
27.01.2025 11:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The Stroop task is a classic tool to study cognitive flexibility. But how does repeated practice influence how we handle the conflict between sensory and semantic information encountered in the Stroop task? (2/n)
27.01.2025 11:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Excited to share my first experimental paper! We tackle how practice shapes cognitive control by running a month-long Stroop task. Hereβs a π§΅: (1/n)
doi.org/10.3758/s134...
I think it goes something like laws, like sausages, cease to inspire respect the more we know how they are made
23.01.2025 21:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Is this a metaphor about sausages?
23.01.2025 19:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Randy Beer has a nice piece on this -
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
I think the motivation was (is?) that dynamical systems need not entail representational talk, unlike classical computation. Totally agree that they work well together though
21.01.2025 11:32 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Looks amazing, congrats! Looking forward to reading it soon
11.01.2025 20:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If your work explores the connections between memory, emotion and forgiveness, and if it does so from a philosophical and/or psychological perspective, please consider submitting a manuscript to this special issue: link.springer.com/collections/... #philosophy #psychology #emotion #forgiveness
20.12.2024 13:46 β π 48 π 19 π¬ 1 π 0We will feature this article in the January session of the International Memory Reading Group:
20.12.2024 11:44 β π 9 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0The #IPM4.5 call for papers is open! Taking place on 22β23 May, this year's conference introduces a new format. We invite early career researchers to submit abstracts by 1 March. Submit here:
11.12.2024 08:51 β π 10 π 9 π¬ 0 π 0@jonathannajenson.bsky.social and I will discuss @thehessam.bsky.social's work in the next session of our International Memory Reading Group
02.12.2024 16:37 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Could the brainβs computational abilities extend beyond neural networks to molecular mechanisms?
Listen to Paul Middlebrooks's latest "Brain Inspired" podcast, in which he talks with @thehessam.bsky.social about how universal computation may have evolved via RNA mechanisms: bit.ly/4eQ4Idc
The sense(s) of touch provides a boundary through which we can understand ourselves. How is this sense of bounded self retained in memory? Iva Apostolova is at The Memory Palace today, exploring the connections between memory and touch. Check it out!
#philsky #philscisky