“Let Me Go Get My Big White Man”: The Clientelist Foundation of Contemporary Antiracist Politics All this makes crystal clear why proponents of race-reductionist politics are so unmoved by criticism based on effectiveness for generating a popular politics or for winning egalitarian reforms at …

nonsite.org/let-me-go-ge...

Love that there’s just a British and French guy, because there was a mandatory quota for their representation any time there was some evil shit going down

*whispers again* read his entire oeuvre since 1975.

*whispers * Adolph reed was right. Liberal corporate anti racism was a class project for the ruling class to cultivate the top layer of non-white elites for an “inclusive” bourgeoise to stave off discussion of class inequality. Now they no longer have to pretend to give a crap out of the black PMC.

I dont give a fuck about white men. It’s about strategy, not being right.

AOC did so, mehdi hassan did so, even ta nehisi, they made it about the man and the movent and not into a racialist critique that would give the white identitarians and the administration easy ammunition.

I mean, the people she works for or that she mentions are not interested in parsing these statements for her true intent, they WILL read it the worst way. Jimmy kemmel was fired right? Colbert? For much less. So it’s not about who’s morally right, it’s about being tactical and strategic.

The white libs in the comments are performing “allyship” instead of being honest. They explicitly state that it’s the “white men” comments. The hard truth cos someone has to say it, is that this type of post became normalized in the last 5 years, and we’re now in a climate where it no longer flies.

Do you think there’s a smarter way to call out intolerance without adding the “white man bad” part and giving your opponents ammunition to say you yourself are being intolerant?

Is it so hard to understand how “white man bad” tweets are walking into a trap in this climate? Even if white man is indeed bad?

No argument, no response just forever being a victim and living in 1850.

👍

So You actually did have to google it…you’re right let’s never do this again it’s a waste of my time sayonara

You have a moral right to wear what you like and not be violated. You do not have a moral right to be employed if your employer wants to fire you. Not in the USA anyway Argument by analogy is lazy AF because you can pretend to be comparing apples to apples when you’re comparing apples to iPhones.

Guile! Google it. Unserious.

Go and see AOC’s statement in congress for how it should be done. Mehdi hassan. Ta nehisi Coates, surprisingly. They were effective, let the guy hang himself with his words. But good white liberals like to self flagellate about being white, so i guess satisfying that fetish comes first for some.

Yes they handled it by being snarky. Whew thought crime punished. Job well done. Now you can get back to being morally right, lacking any sort of guile and getting steamrolled by the fascists. But you get to feel morally superior. Unserious people.

You could definitely make it harder for them. Instead the belief seems to be that being morally right is the end in itself. That is what’s naive. And makes you absolutely no match for the unscrupulous fascists you’re up against. Let’s all grow up and wise up please. It’s 2025 not 2016.

You could definitely make it harder for them. Instead the belief seems to be that being morally right is the end in itself. That is what’s naive. And makes you absolutely no match for the unscrupulous fascists you’re up against. Let’s all grow up and wise up please. It’s 2025 not 2016.

Also when you make what could be a critique of a person or a movement into a critique, even if valid, of “whites”, that’s the racialist tone that makes people who want to fire you say in bad faith, “ShE’s BEiNg rAcIst!” This is why liberals are routed, you think it’s about being morally right.

Because the billionaires don’t like you and will use any excuse if you provide it to them to get rid of you, but the billionaires were paying Charlie Kirk to be racist and sexist to get college kids to vote the way they like. Get it? It’s not about fairness, it’s about being politically savvy.

Kirk was being racist, obviously. I’m not saying what Karen said is the equivalent, I’m saying that in an environment where media companies are bending over to appease the right, and where white grievance is increasingly mainstream, a broad critique of “whiteness” is not wise. Why is this hard?

“I (me), I’m tired of being asked to perform care and absolution for violent white men etc”….kind of navel-gazing, interpretive, walks right into the trap of taking a racialist tone that is obviously less accepted in this climate, gives the pretext for your billionaire-owned paper to fire you.

“Charlie Kirk was a propagandist who was paid by billionaires to indoctrinate college kids against black people, migrants etc. He shouldn’t have been murdered”. Truthful, morally right, unfirable tweet.

Sure. Maybe I’m naive or stupid, i would have called out the whitewashing of who Kirk was without doing the “oh poor me” of “I’m so tired of being asked to perform care for violent white men” and I’d still have a job. These moralistic pronouncements are doing exactly what for who exactly lol?

Not doing anything I’m just a random guy…actually advising a sister to maybe be more strategic and not walk into obvious traps.

it. Maybe be strategic, and be able to admit saying the white part out loud gives them the pretext to make you look bad, much the way Kirk’s comment with about black women rightly makes him look bad. But some people want to be righteous instead of not walking into obvious traps.

Yeah…i didn’t say i agree with them…but it’s obvious that without the word “white” in there, the pretext wouldn’t be there. A little clear headed analysis goes a long way, not always moral superiority.

I mean, their excuse, which you gifted to them, was the racialized comment about care for white men or whatever, which is ironically the same kind of thing kirk was doing with black women. So i dont think that was wise on your part. You’ll be ok tho.

Charlie Kirk in His Own Words 17 quotes you should read from the right-wing activist and Trump ally who was tragically shot and killed on Wednesday in Utah.

“Charlie Kirk in His Own Words”

17 quotes you should read from the right-wing activist and Trump ally who was tragically shot and killed on Wednesday in Utah.