An excellent article — a must-read for all #INC negotiators
06.10.2025 12:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@magnuslovold.bsky.social
Multilateral processes, treaty-making and diplomacy with NAIL and Lex International. Writing for Spoiler Alert and Points of Order.
An excellent article — a must-read for all #INC negotiators
06.10.2025 12:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0“We reaffirm that all states, including in situations of occupation, are bound to fully respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law” — 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇯🇴🇰🇿🇿🇦 with @icrc.org announce high-level conference to uphold humanity in war in 2026 www.icrc.org/en/statement...
23.09.2025 10:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Building on the legacy of the #MineBanTreaty, the #ClusterMunitionsConvention, and the #TPNW, Colombia 🇨🇴 is stepping up to host a major international conference on phasing out fossil fuels. A new Oslo/Ottawa moment is on the horizon. Way to go! fossilfueltreaty.org/phase-out-co...
22.09.2025 13:27 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0After the Geneva round of the #PlasticsTreaty talks ended without a deal, troubling questions are being raised about the role played by @unep.org Executive Director Inger Andersen — and an apparent bid to topple the Committee’s elected Chair medium.com/points-of-or...
22.09.2025 09:43 — 👍 3 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 2💣 An excellent analysis of the #PlasticsTreaty 's Whistledown (aka @magnuslovold.bsky.social) of what happened behind the scenes at the end of #INC5.2. Once again, important questions are raised about the role of UNEP, which seems to support a low-ambition treaty #Plastics
medium.com/points-of-or...
#PlasticsTreaty recap post Geneva 🇨🇭
19.08.2025 14:07 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0If consensus falters, countries will have to decide whether to call for a vote or leave with failure.
By Friday, we’ll know if the world acted — or let the plastics crisis run on medium.com/points-of-or...
The progressive majority may seize the moment. Spoilers like 🇸🇦 and 🇷🇺 are expected to push back. Heavyweights 🇺🇸, 🇨🇳, 🇮🇳, 🇧🇷 could try to retake control.
The High Ambition Coalition’s #HAC move will be watched closely 👀
The draft arrives with less than 48 hours left of the process. Financing measures may close to agreement, but the treaty’s core — what countries must do — is still up in the air. Delegates are bracing for a fight over ambition.
13.08.2025 12:14 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🇺🇳 #PlasticsTreaty endgame, Geneva.
This afternoon, Ambassador Luis Vayas of Ecuador will table his own “compromise text” — a make-or-break move to break the deadlock and push the talks towards a deal to end plastic pollution. 🧵
New blog post! Here at the #plasticstreaty negotiations, some countries are arguing for a weak treaty on the grounds that plastic producing countries won't join a strong one. Here's a short rebuttal: medium.com/@climatesail... 🧵
10.08.2025 10:54 — 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0… And they’re back! PlastiSphere’s host @anjakrieger.bsky.social interviews the close observer and analyst of the Plastic Treaty Negotiations, @magnuslovold.bsky.social, to get a read on where things stand half-way through this supposedly last session (INC-5.2) of those negotiations.
10.08.2025 06:20 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1Five days into the last round of #plasticstreaty negotiations, @magnuslovold.bsky.social and I got together to discuss where we stand. Listen here 🎧
#INC52
on.soundcloud.com/E1eFAK5VLUZF...
Hi #INC5👋 from 1972 when the @washingtonpost.com ran this lede: “We are all just a little bit plastic now.” 😮💨
.
Said the White House’s Council on Env Quality, “I know this is going to be a significant future issue… potentially our next bad one.” Re: #phthalates
#plasticstreaty
Six days left.
The #PlasticsTreaty talks are — again — drowning in brackets.
Take control of the pen. Or watch the deal disappear into a black hole.
medium.com/points-of-or...
Nice piece on #plasticstreaty dynamics and the possible ways toward an effective treaty news.mongabay.com/2025/07/as-u...
01.08.2025 14:45 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I explore how majority-driven diplomacy could rescue the plastics treaty—and multilateralism itself—in my new piece for Backchannel, a great new Substack for commentary, intelligence, and analysis on climate diplomacy, geopolitics & the energy transition.
substack.com/home/post/p-...
This could change in Geneva.
A clear majority of countries back a treaty to phase out the most harmful plastics and chemicals.
If they stand firm and use the tools they already have, they can deliver a strong, binding agreement.
Majority voting is standard in global health, human rights, even nuclear disarmament.
But in environmental forums, it’s a taboo.
Consensus rules allow a handful of petrochemical and fossil fuel states to hold the planet hostage.
For decades, environmental diplomacy has followed what Arild Underdal called the law of the least ambitious programme:
Agreements shaped not by the “ayes” of the majority but by the “nays” of the least committed.
On 5 August, the final act of the #PlasticsTreaty negotiations resumes in Geneva.
The big question? Not what’s in the treaty, but whether negotiators will have the courage to move ahead without spoilers. 🧵
The story — written by journalist @emmaanne.bsky.social — raises tough questions about the perverse incentives at play in mine action.
Emma reached out @thehalotrust.bsky.social for comment. They declined.
Read the full story: spoileralerts.substack.com/p/questionab...
“It’s highly disturbing,” says the director of @minefreeworld.bsky.social
Others in the sector describe Cowan’s logic — “don’t worry, we’ll clean it up later” — as deeply cynical.
Some fear he’s legitimising landmine use in a moment of real danger.
Cowan’s comments come as Finland, Poland & others signal plans to withdraw from the Mine Ban Treaty.
He’s argued for so-called “non-persistent” mines — but these still harm civilians, often fail, and are banned for a reason.
Other NGOs are pushing back hard.
Why is the CEO of the world’s largest de-mining NGO defending landmines?
James Cowan of @thehalotrust.bsky.social has publicly supported the shipment of anti-personnel mines to Ukraine — even suggesting the Mine Ban Treaty should be revised 🧵
If there was ever any doubt why France 🇫🇷 tried to stop @who.int from revisiting the health impacts of nuclear war at #WHA78 last night—this is why.
For decades, France & other nuclear powers have tried to bury the truth about these weapons @jonhenley.bsky.social www.theguardian.com/world/2025/m...
Thanks Oliver! The resolution was approved this afternoon by a margin of 84-14, with 28 abstentions healthpolicy-watch.news/who-gets-man...
26.05.2025 18:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Great piece by @magnuslovold.bsky.social Watch this space on whether nuclear allies are willing to support international efforts by @who.int to examine the effects of a nuclear war on health and health services. is.gd/RMMhLu
26.05.2025 05:34 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0"This is not a technical debate. It is a defining moment for international law — and for the future of warfare. At its core, it is about our capacity as a species to master the technologies we create." #AutonomousWeapons #KillerRobots
09.05.2025 14:55 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Cover of the episode published May 8, 2025, titled How (Not) to Make a Plastics Treaty - Nothing is Agreed Until Everything is Agreed
Did the #plasticstreaty negotiations fail? Not so fast! The process is far from over.
For an update on where we stand and what’s to come, listen to the new plastisphere.earth episode 🎧
You'll hear from
💡 @magnuslovold.bsky.social
🦸Chris Dixon @eia-news.bsky.social
🧢 @andresdelcas.bsky.social