Matt Samberg's Avatar

Matt Samberg

@mattsamberg.bsky.social

Lawyer, philosopher, DIY cosmetic enthusiast.

43 Followers  |  28 Following  |  242 Posts  |  Joined: 29.10.2023  |  2.419

Latest posts by mattsamberg.bsky.social on Bluesky

This Deal's Getting Worse All The Time | Robot Chicken | Adult Swim
YouTube video by Adult Swim This Deal's Getting Worse All The Time | Robot Chicken | Adult Swim

youtu.be/WpE_xMRiCLE?...

13.10.2025 03:45 β€” πŸ‘ 30    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
This Deal's Getting Worse All The Time | Robot Chicken | Adult Swim
YouTube video by Adult Swim This Deal's Getting Worse All The Time | Robot Chicken | Adult Swim

And still one of my favorite Robot Chicken moments ever. youtu.be/WpE_xMRiCLE?...

13.10.2025 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We’re going to have a lot of work to do identifying and punishing every single one of these criminal thugs with the full force of the law.

08.10.2025 00:08 β€” πŸ‘ 261    πŸ” 54    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 1

And when (not if!) things return to normal, we need to dedicate resources to finding and prosecuting every one of them.

08.10.2025 02:31 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m no expert, but I feel like revolutions have started over less.

08.10.2025 02:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Imperial Wars Always Come Home There’s a person I think about from time to time.

patrickwyman.substack.com/p/imperial-w...

07.10.2025 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, I’m fully expecting this week’s pod to just be a deep dive into TLoaS Easter eggs.

06.10.2025 13:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They’re moving quickly because they get less popular every day.

They’ll never be more popular than they are now and they are extremely unpopular.

05.10.2025 14:57 β€” πŸ‘ 646    πŸ” 133    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 5

Pretty clear Stephen Miller, Noem, Hegseth and Trump are trying to provoke a Civil War at this point. What's interesting is they want to do it now, because even though they're unpopular, they seem to believe this is the most popular they'll be ever again. We can't let them win.

06.10.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 11691    πŸ” 2976    πŸ’¬ 240    πŸ“Œ 81

you! are! a! lawyer!

I fear that the legal community will act like Trump admin's lawyers are normal lawyers--like they'll get nice firm jobs and their law schools will invite them to talk to students, etc--but the lawyers facilitating Trump's lawlessness should be professionally and socially shamed

06.10.2025 03:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2012    πŸ” 411    πŸ’¬ 52    πŸ“Œ 9
Preview
Who Goes Nazi?, by Dorothy Thompson

Every few months now I re-read this "Who Goes Nazi?" piece from 1941 and am blown away by how it captures the people we are dealing with 80 years later.

harpers.org/archive/1941...

01.10.2025 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 7942    πŸ” 3167    πŸ’¬ 242    πŸ“Œ 303

And the Secretary of β€œD”efense…

02.10.2025 03:53 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

(Putting aside that this focus on originalism has allowed originalists to create an entirely false narrative of what the constitution and 14th amendment meant to the framers. Once again showing how liberals get hoodwinked into playing a rigged game with dishonest opponents.) 4/3

30.09.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s like the bit in the Passover Seder where the wicked son asks β€œwhat does this holiday mean to *you*?”, and you have to lecture him that saying β€œyou” and not β€œus” he has excluded himself from the project of freedom. (3/3)

30.09.2025 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

where the goal of constitutional interpretation is ascertaining what the constitution meant to *them* – those that wrote it. The real question is what the constitution means to *us* (2/3)

30.09.2025 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jamellebouie.net @sifill.bsky.social @strictscrutiny.bsky.social I liked your explanation that we need to enunciate a clear view of what the constitution means to us on the left. I feel like democrats have been hoodwinked by Scalia et al. into adopting a form of originalism (1/3)

30.09.2025 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s why he has all those crusader tattoos. Can you imagine how much that dude would have loved the crusades? Hanging out with bloodthirsty failson knights would have been his jam!

30.09.2025 12:33 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In this thinking, if the GOP had run a β€œnormal” candidate (if those exist anymore in the GOP), how big would the margin have been?

28.09.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think what distresses liberals is that it was even close. On one side you had Trump, the Worst Person in the World, an insurrectionist who doesn’t believe in democracy or freedom. The fact that it was even close (let alone a loss) was a blow to a lot of psyches.

28.09.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In the DOJ’s defense, it’s not like anything outrageously unethical happened here, like, I dunno, Melania having an informal conversation with Pam Bondi.

26.09.2025 01:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If Vance, Hegseth, Noem, Patel, and the rest of the gang have cable news shows in 10 years instead of being behind bars, we will have failed.

19.09.2025 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The gap between what the right thinks happens on college campuses and what actually happens is absurd. I had some great students and some awful ones; we talked about some difficult topics, from sexual violence to capitalism to exploitation; it was fine. Nobody lost their shit, because we're adults.

17.09.2025 16:22 β€” πŸ‘ 999    πŸ” 123    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 16

Question is - can Bari keep up with her persecution complex when she's running CBS news? (Though Republicans being in control of all four parts of the federal government doesn't seem to prevent them from claiming persecution....)

16.09.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œMilo Was Practicing Politics the Right Way”

NYT | M. Tullius Cicero

15.09.2025 13:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Tbf, I’m not sure the β€œCatiline is the devil incarnate and let’s execute him without trial” approach worked out much better (for either Rome or Cicero)

15.09.2025 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

My sister listens to Tides, and my nephew (age 9) apparently loved the prehistory seasons, even if he didn't follow all of the science. So you'd definitely have a listener there!

12.09.2025 18:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The paper was born from a frustration that scholarly discussions of democracy often appeared to be talking past each other, because it was clear that one person had a deontological worldview and the other a consequentialist worldview, and they somehow didn’t recognize the fundamental disagreement

12.09.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And a consequentialist view of democracy, where there is a goal of human self-actualization and non-subordination, and democracy is the best means to that end. The former view gives you the same absurd consequences as Kantian morality; the latter allows for richer politics. 2/3

12.09.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@patrickwyman.bsky.social Replies are muted in the Elias Isquith thread, but this is an underappreciated distinction. In law school, I wrote a paper in a legal philosophy class criticizing the deontological view of democracy, where democracy is the duty, and any deviation from it is suspects. 1/3

12.09.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Family MarioKart parties FTW!

12.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@mattsamberg is following 20 prominent accounts