Yep. They obviously donβt need to βinvoke the Insurrection Actβ to do heinous and corrupt shit. They already are.
The only thing it does is provide a thin veneer of legitimacy to his actions for the willfully blind.
@violaplayer26.bsky.social
Yep. They obviously donβt need to βinvoke the Insurrection Actβ to do heinous and corrupt shit. They already are.
The only thing it does is provide a thin veneer of legitimacy to his actions for the willfully blind.
That your port is open~
10.10.2025 23:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Note: he did a lot of extra judicial killing of βnarcoterroristsβ
I wish we were a signatory to the ICC
Bitch be crazy!!!
10.10.2025 23:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Will you join in our crusade? Who will be strong and stand with me?
Yeah, I went there. Bringing the Les Mis
aaand we are officially in the hide-your-neighbors stage
10.10.2025 22:31 β π 16034 π 6493 π¬ 253 π 213Survey says: 99.9%
10.10.2025 23:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Please remind all of your colleagues: if we ever return to some semblance of democracy and true law, the actions they are allowing to continue will bankrupt the US through the lawsuits. The ICE 4th amendment violations alone should do it. Let alone the 1st amendment violations.
10.10.2025 22:22 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0PA needs to yank his license. Wtaf!
10.10.2025 21:56 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Good gods. Itβs already hard to get justice! One of those contractor types finally lost a lawsuit December of 2024 for their support of the torture of US prisoners in the post 9/11 war on terror. Took 15 years! But at least it was $42 million.
www.hrw.org/news/2024/11...
Heβs gorgeous!!!!
10.10.2025 21:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I bet heβs on blood thinners (bruises) but still hypercoaguable.
10.10.2025 21:48 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0I got $5 they say Bellβs palsy
10.10.2025 21:47 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0ππΊπΈ
10.10.2025 20:58 β π 6252 π 2262 π¬ 141 π 96Hereβs the issue though.
Regular law enforcement is bad enough. They know our rights and violate them because of limited accountability.
ICE doesnβt really know (especially landmark court precedent e.g. Graham v Connor) and doesnβt care about our rights. They are thugs who enjoy othersβ pain
βIβm worried about my communityβ¦ Iβm out here in a frog costume to show how ridiculous the notion that weβre violent terrorists is, and showcase how that narrative is wrongβ¦β
Serious Q: is it too late to give this dude the Nobel Peace Prize? πΈ π
Iβm thinking, spit balling here β¦ just hear me out β¦
The people missing from Alligator Auschwitz are the ones who have the Epstein files.
Bitch. Stay outta MN. We will bring out our ice fishing houses, hot dish, and throw snowballs at you.
10.10.2025 20:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0To be fair, they donβt actually work when the do show up for work.
10.10.2025 19:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yooooohoooo! Hey surveilers.
Fuck ICE
Come at me bro!
Preach! We in the US are definitely an example of how not to be.
10.10.2025 18:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dooooooo it!
Iβm going as an OWL. (Old white lady)
Do-Re-Mi: Beer and fascism style.
Do. The stuff that buys me beer.
Re. The guy who sells me beer.
Mi. I said I want a beer.
Fa. The reason I need that fucking beer.
Sol. I said I want a beer.
La. La La La La beer.
Ti. No thanks, Iβll have a beer.
Fuck ICE.
Thank you! Iβm here all night.
Not to brag but Iβm not a lawyer. But I believe utter or complete bullshit are actually the acceptable legal terms.
10.10.2025 17:46 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh hey der! Yah, you betcha. Youβre one of us now, it will never leave you! Mwuahhahaha.
10.10.2025 17:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In general, the police have no duty to protect people. That said, there is something under section 1983 (part of civil right act). Thereβs a duty to intervene People need to start filing lawsuits against local police under section 1983 - failure to intervene. Hereβs a snip from SCOTUS Yang v. Hardin
10.10.2025 17:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In general, the police have no duty to protect people. That said, there is something under section 1983 (part of civil right act). Thereβs a duty to intervene People need to start filing lawsuits against local police under section 1983 - failure to intervene. Hereβs a snip from SCOTUS Yang v. Hardin
10.10.2025 17:09 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0ππ
10.10.2025 14:55 β π 4665 π 2532 π¬ 335 π 202