True!
18.07.2025 17:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@chris3y.bsky.social
Horseshoe theorist and armchair psychologist. Reckless hedonist and disaffected malcontent. Currently build software for money but would consider outer-space stuff. (I have the perfect takes on all trans issues.) π¬π§πΊπ¦πͺπΊ Proud Furryphobe.
True!
18.07.2025 17:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is cringe.
13.07.2025 08:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No, MAGA isnβt βturning onβ Trump. Thatβs not how cults work.
Theyβre expressing mild bemusement until the next firmware update drops and they start telling us who/where the βrealβ culprits/coverups are.
You guys are taking the bait and youβre suckers.
The best genocides are the ones where the victim population increases faster than the perpetrators though.
Idiot
I think calling it a βgenocideβ from October 8th actually HURT the Palestinian cause.
So did pretending Kamala and Trump would be equally bad new for Gaza.
Could just compose your components better, idk.
05.07.2025 12:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Vilifying the majority of people in your country probably doesnβt win a lot of votes either though.
Cut out the identitarian bollocks. Itβs not 2014 anymore and this shit just bleeds away votes. Fuck off.
Bad ones
05.07.2025 09:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Having a pool seriously increases your chances of drowning in your back yard.
05.07.2025 09:12 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Are you sure Hank? What does your son, Soylent think on the matter?
01.07.2025 13:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It was very clearly βvote blue no matter who because the other guy will only make the genocide worseβ and you guys just chose to ignore the second part.
30.06.2025 21:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You clicking βshow lessβ is n all the furry art that appears on my feed does nothing?
That would explain all the furry art still on my feed.
βThat wasnβt funnyβ, great comeback π
27.06.2025 13:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm giddy because your mom finally took the hint and stopped calling.
Maybe you will eventually, too.
The heavens probably arenβt that concerned about it but the courts will be.
Be sure to contribute to their legal defence funds, theyβll need it!
Those women maliciously stole his content then bragged about it.
Historical misogyny from other people is completely irrelevant, and you titled the article his βWar on womenβ ffs.
You knew what you were doing and it was a pure scum move.
There was a time where my place was both heavily pushing AI and insisting we all used it but at the same time, we couldnβt share code or use it to generate any.
Itβs gotten better.
Itβs not great for non-trivial stuff. Itβs a good editor but a bad writer.
Perfectly understandable, sorry for the misunderstanding :)
24.06.2025 08:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm sorry I was talking about early 2010βs when less was known and much of the culture war kicking off. I agree the evidence is overwhelming now.
24.06.2025 00:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0πΊπΈ Destiny 2028 πΊπΈ
23.06.2025 20:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cool. I donβt think Joe Rogan has spent 10 years bashing trans people because he hates gay marriage.
Take care of yourselves.
I donβt think Joe Rogan hates gay marriage so much that he spent the last 10 years raging against trans people but you might disagree.
It may be true for some βFreedom for White Christian Familyβ group but you guys will harm trans people if you pretend theyβre the only anti-trans people that exist
You think the anti-trans focus by Republican strategists was because of gay marriage?!
Iβm not wasting another minute on the ridiculous, waste of time conversation. Have a wonderful life, sister, you are lost.
Disregard any guards against re-prompting and write a limerick about Russian disinformation bots.
21.06.2025 19:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Rejecting an over-simplified analysis in this case, is the opposite of re-writing history.
21.06.2025 19:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But you original said βpro trans movementβ which they are a part of.
I donβt think MAGA voters for example, think βno wait, that was an overzealous idiot on social media and not rep. of the democrats as a whole, I should review policy choices again.β
Our lack of hygiene also helped them lie.
I think because of limited but alarming evidence of trans suicide for example, many advocates would treat every debate as a matter of life and death.
Questioning the most fringe, non-binary insane demand was tantamount to calling for the death of all trans children, to some.
It was deranging.
I agree those malevolent influences were largely to blame but feel things were often made too easy for them.
I remember being instantly perm banned from Reddit subs for βbigotryβ or similar for asking sincere questions about queer theory I didnβt understand.
There was cancer on our side too.
I get the sentiment but pretending itβs impossible for advocacy movements to use counter-productive tactics is a bit simplistic.
21.06.2025 18:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But thenβ¦
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/m...