European Political Science Review's Avatar

European Political Science Review

@epsrjournal.bsky.social

European Political Science Review (EPSR) is an #OpenAccess journal of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR).

2,183 Followers  |  83 Following  |  89 Posts  |  Joined: 13.06.2025
Posts Following

Posts by European Political Science Review (@epsrjournal.bsky.social)

Preview
European Political Science Review: Volume 18 - Issue 1 | Cambridge Core Cambridge Core - European Political Science Review - Volume 18 - Issue 1

That is all form the latest issue of European Political Science Research!

Find papers πŸ“° covering #MiniPublics, #Trust, #Attitudes and more #OpenAccess now!

27.02.2026 11:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Lobbying coalitions and their determinants: a systematic literature review | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Lobbying coalitions and their determinants: a systematic literature review - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Why do interest groups team up? 🧠

Andrea Pritoni, Alberto Bitonti & Giuseppe Montalbano show that coalition-building is driven more by shared beliefs and issue importance than by lack of resources 🌍️

27.02.2026 09:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Ingroup and outgroup effects on party placement perceptions | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Ingroup and outgroup effects on party placement perceptions - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Why do different groups see the same political parties so differently?

Ingrid Mauerer & M. Socorro Puy use evidence from the Basque Country to show that social identities, especially national identity and religion, strongly shape how people perceive where parties stand. 🧩

26.02.2026 17:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The democracy falling narrative: debunking stereotypes about democratic deconsolidation in the EU | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core The democracy falling narrative: debunking stereotypes about democratic deconsolidation in the EU - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Is public opinion turning reactionary? πŸ€”

L.J.Brunkert, B.Puranen, A.Turska-Kawa & C.Welzel find no evidence that #Voters in Europe have become more polarized or anti-democratic in ways that explain the rise of the far right using survey data

25.02.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Far-right against green: the re-emergence of geographically defined voting patterns and the new environment cleavage in Western Europe | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Far-right against green: the re-emergence of geographically defined voting patterns and the new environment cleavage in Western Europe - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Far-right against green 🌳

@dafnoukos.bsky.social @chvrakopoulos.bsky.social & C.Arndt find that rural groups are more likely to push back against green policy as they 'lose' compared to cities, highlighting how climate issues can/are creating new social & geographic divides

24.02.2026 17:17 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

@cvalebeek.bsky.social @tomwgvdmeer.bsky.social & @hakhverdian.bsky.social use survery data from the Netherlands to find that #Trust variability may be just as strong a predictor as #Trust levels in #VotingBehaviour πŸ—³οΈ

23.02.2026 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Perceived legitimacy as a third dimension of bicameralism: Czech senators versus the Czech general public | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Perceived legitimacy as a third dimension of bicameralism: Czech senators versus the Czech general public - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

How do we feel about #Bicameralism? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

By interviewing Czech senators and ordinary Czech citizens, @sgparliaments.bsky.social's Jan HruΕ‘ka addresses how differently the upper and lower chambers are actually viewed and identifies influential factors

20.02.2026 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Uncertainty and political elites’ behavior: introducing the uncertainty grid | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Uncertainty and political elites’ behavior: introducing the uncertainty grid - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Barbara Vis, from @ecprpublicpolicy.bsky.social, & Olaf van der Veen develop an 'uncertainty grid' to map phenomena, showing its application during the #COVID-19🦠 pandemic and highlighting how it can be used to guess the behaviour of political elites πŸ—ΊοΈ

19.02.2026 17:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
ECPR's journals now Open Access with Cambridge University Press All content from our journals is now free to read and share

πŸ”“ No paywalls. No barriers.
🌐 Just world-class political science research from ECPR, freely available to anyone, anywhere.
πŸ“˜ @ejprjournal.bsky.social
πŸŸͺ @epsrjournal.bsky.social
πŸ““ @pdyearbook.bsky.social
πŸ“— @epsjournal.bsky.social
πŸ“™ @prxjournal.bsky.social

#OpenAccess #PoliSky

19.02.2026 10:02 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy? | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core The would-be autocrats’ toolkit: what do incumbents do when they undermine democracy? - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

The would-be #Autocrats’ toolkit πŸ› οΈ

@jmvanlit.bsky.social & Carolien van Ham analyse incumbent-led autocratization between 1990 & 2023, producing a toolkit allowing a ore systematic study of #Autocratization

18.02.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Which mini-publics do they favour? A European experiment on Politicians’ attitudes towards mini-publics’ design | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Which mini-publics do they favour? A European experiment on Politicians’ attitudes towards mini-publics’ design - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1🌹

Who's there?! πŸ‘€ πŸ”οΈ

Rodrigo Ramis-Moyano of @ecprsgpp.bsky.social, Emma Lancha-HernΓ‘ndez & Sara Pasadas-del-Amo look at conjoin evidence across 5 countries to see which #MiniPublics are favoured, showing preferences for mixed deliberation and concerns about scaling up

buff.ly/WJ9EDmR

17.02.2026 17:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
ECPR's journals now Open Access with Cambridge University Press European Consortium for Political Research

For a while now πŸ•°οΈ our latest articles have been open access on Cambridge Core β€” so they’re easy to share with students, incorporate into teaching, or circulate among colleagues, all fully peer-reviewed and free to read πŸ₯³

16.02.2026 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Lost autonomy triggers and the rise of secessionism | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Lost autonomy triggers and the rise of secessionism - Volume 18 Issue 1

18.1 🌹

What triggers secessionist waves? πŸ„οΈ

Using synthetic control models and process tracing, @felixschulte.bsky.social, @mscanti.bsky.social & Maria AckrΓ©n show that sudden losses of autonomy were decisive in the Faroes (1992) and Catalonia (2010)

13.02.2026 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
European Political Science Review: Volume 18 - Issue 1 | Cambridge Core Cambridge Core - European Political Science Review - Volume 18 - Issue 1

The latest issue of European Political Science Research is out now!

With work from our authors covering #MiniPublics, #Trust, #Attitudes and more!

Keep an eye out πŸ‘€ for more of 18.1πŸ’‘

11.02.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Open research funding open access publication Welcome to Cambridge Core

Wondering how Open Access can be funded? πŸ€”

Through the @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org & ECPR partnership, EPSR authors benefit from guidance on OA funding routes, including institutional agreements πŸ’°οΈ

buff.ly/e11eP6L

09.02.2026 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
ECPR's journals now Open Access with Cambridge University Press European Consortium for Political Research

βœ” Global reach
βœ” Robust publishing infrastructure
βœ” Proven Open Access expertise

Our partnership with @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org delivers all thisβ€”and more πŸ‘€

06.02.2026 12:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
In situ or ex situ overseas climate adaptation? Public support for immigration and climate aid in the Netherlands | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core In situ or ex situ overseas climate adaptation? Public support for immigration and climate aid in the Netherlands

E.Holtmaat, @nives-dolsak.bsky.social & A.Prakash investigate response in the Netherlands when helping #GlobalSouth countries adapt to climate change, with contributing factors, including support for countries with strong trading ties 🀝 & a commitment to climate neutrality 🌈

05.02.2026 09:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
ECPR's journals now Open Access with Cambridge University Press European Consortium for Political Research

2026 marks the start of a new chapter for ECPR πŸ’œ

We went Open Access with @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org in 2024 β€” now other ECPR journals are following in our new strategic partnership.

We’ll be sharing what this means for readers, authors, and the global political science community.

04.02.2026 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The letter and the bond: coalitions, anti-coalitions, and the adoption of the coronabond in the European Union | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core The letter and the bond: coalitions, anti-coalitions, and the adoption of the coronabond in the European Union

Why did countries back shared EU debt during COVID-19🦠 after rejecting it in the euro crisis?

@tiagomramalho.bsky.social explains how a new β€œsolidarity coalition” formed in 2020 and what it reveals about changing ideas of responsibility in the EU.

21.01.2026 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Stable or variable distrust? Disentangling the relationship between political trust and electoral behavior

What happens when #Trust becomes volatile? πŸ’₯

@cvalebeek.bsky.social @tomwgvdmeer.bsky.social & @hakhverdian.bsky.social use survey data from the Netherlands πŸ‡³πŸ‡± to analyse how #VotingBehaviour is impacted by three key components of #PoliticalTrust.

Find out what they are πŸ‘‰ πŸ“–

buff.ly/gT7AWxe

20.01.2026 12:58 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hi Tom,

My sincere apologies for this error!

This post has now been removed and a new post has now been issued.

Please let me know if there are any further issues.

20.01.2026 12:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Blessing or curse? A critical review of the paradoxical consequences of direct public funding for political parties | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Blessing or curse? A critical review of the paradoxical consequences of direct public funding for political parties

Does #PublicMoney level the playing field or change it in unexpected ways? πŸ’Έ

Fernando Casal BΓ©rtoa, William Horncastle & @sergiulipcean.bsky.social
examine the impact on competition, #PartyDevelopment, representation, and corruption. The findings are far from conclusive, raising key questions.

15.01.2026 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Ingroup and outgroup effects on party placement perceptions | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Ingroup and outgroup effects on party placement perceptions

Why do different groups see the same political parties so differently?

Ingrid Mauerer & M. Socorro Puy use evidence from the Basque Country to show that social identities, especially national identity and religion, strongly shape how people perceive where parties stand. 🧩

14.01.2026 07:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Lost autonomy triggers and the rise of secessionism | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Lost autonomy triggers and the rise of secessionism

Why do some autonomy disputes suddenly turn into secessionist explosions?πŸ’₯

@felixschulte.bsky.social, @mscanti.bsky.social & Maria AckrΓ©n show that it is not just institutions or long-term grievances, but also triggering events that signal a loss of autonomy and change everything.

buff.ly/FUSwtCq

13.01.2026 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The drivers of resemblance in presidential regimes: explaining the conversion of pre-electoral coalitions into coalition cabinets | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core The drivers of resemblance in presidential regimes: explaining the conversion of pre-electoral coalitions into coalition cabinets

But what happens next? 🫱 🫲

@lucascoutoz.bsky.social uses a cross-case analysis of Latin American 🌎 cases to question why some governments closely follow their pre-electoral #Coalition agreements while others do not.

buff.ly/A8Z1B2c

13.01.2026 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

πŸŽ„ Our team is taking a short break.

We’ll be back in the New Yearβ€”refreshed and ready to read more great research πŸ₯³

19.12.2025 11:46 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Uncertainty and political elites’ behavior: introducing the uncertainty grid | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Uncertainty and political elites’ behavior: introducing the uncertainty grid

Politics runs on uncertainty yet the concept is fuzzy. 🀯

A new uncertainty grid by Barbara Vis & Olaf van der Veen helps map when phenomena are certain, workably uncertain, or radically uncertain with lessons from Covid-19 🦠

19.12.2025 09:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Public satisfaction with democracy: the role of the economy and political institutions | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Public satisfaction with democracy: the role of the economy and political institutions

When does the #Economy affect #Trust in #Democracy? πŸ€”

Brandon Beomseob Park & @marystegmaier.bsky.social look at 30 democracies to find that it matters most where political responsibility is clear

17.12.2025 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The democracy falling narrative: debunking stereotypes about democratic deconsolidation in the EU | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core The democracy falling narrative: debunking stereotypes about democratic deconsolidation in the EU

πŸ“‰ Is democratic #Backsliding driven by reactionary voters?

A long-term analysis by L.J. Brunkert, B. Puranen, A. Turska-Kawa & C. Welzel across EU countries challenges this idea, questioning whether shifts in public opinion really explain the rise of right-wing #Populism

16.12.2025 13:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Citizens’ trust in constitutional courts: evidence from Spain | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core Citizens’ trust in constitutional courts: evidence from Spain

βš–οΈ What makes people #Trust constitutional courts?

Using Spain after the Catalonia ruling, Pablo Castillo-Ortiz & @rosanavarrete.bsky.social show that judicial independence and technocratic qualities matter more for trust than how judges are politically appointed

16.12.2025 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0