A picture of a chocolate labrador curled up on a pile of throw pillows and looking sleepily at the camera
Weekly Ruport: bad news cycle means more emotional support pillows
23.09.2025 09:24 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@anecdatally.bsky.social
Asst. prof of epidemiology at UNC Chapel Hill | training at HSPH, UiO, UMass Med, BUSPH | interests in rxepi, repro-perinatal epi, methods | she/her/dr
A picture of a chocolate labrador curled up on a pile of throw pillows and looking sleepily at the camera
Weekly Ruport: bad news cycle means more emotional support pillows
23.09.2025 09:24 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0As a post script, I also want to say that I find the βmedically necessaryβ language around APAP use ridiculous and insulting. Do they think pregnant women are taking acetaminophen for fun? Or mistaking the pills for candy?
23.09.2025 09:18 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0PPE 2019 study: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ppe.12568
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0IJE 2015 study: academic.oup.com/ije/article/...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You wouldnβt know it from this thread, but other people have opinions about APAP in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes. @perdamkier.bsky.social in particular has written a lot about the topic, including this piece: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...for specific conditions during pregnancy. Active comparator designs would strengthen these types of studies significantly, particularly for conditions where βno treatmentβ is not a realistic or ethical recommendation.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0People taking high doses of APAP for long periods of time arenβt irresponsible, theyβre desperate. Most frustratingly, APAP isnβt a particularly good drug for chronic pain conditions. All of which is to say: I think research needs to focus more on comparing clinically meaningful treatments...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And in this small study done in a single hospital in Norway, we saw many women switching from previous migraine treatments to APAP, and reporting high levels of pain not managed by APAP: bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But it is critical to understand what is driving high-dose, long-duration APAP use in pregnancy. In this descriptive study of migraine in pregnancy, we saw decreasing use of other drugs and increases in APAP: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0My pet hypothesis, for which I only have indirect evidence, is something like this: I think it is possible that very high doses of APAP over extended periods of time (i.e., 500+mg daily for multiple weeks) could cause neurodevelopmental differences in exposed fetuses.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why is acetaminophen so hard to study? Reason 4: dose, duration, and timing of use are likely important, which amplifies the measurement problem (Reason 1), makes the confounding problem worse (Reason 2), and is further hampered by the selection problem (Reason 3).
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...how do we think about the counterfactual here? The children with prenatal APAP exposure might not have been born, had their parent not used APAP.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why is acetaminophen so hard to study? Reason 3: studies of neurodevelopment almost always condition on a live birth. But untreated fever in early pregnancy can lead to miscarriage, so...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...much of the use for pain conditions is among people who were managed on a different (more effective) drug before pregnancy and then switched when they became pregnant.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why is acetaminophen so hard to study? Reason 2: there is a huge range of reasons for using APAP, all of which have different relationships with neurodevelopment. People take APAP for pain and fever, yes, but...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some studies have used biomarkers (urine, meconium), but APAP is metabolized quickly so these measures are only a snapshot for specific time windows.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why is acetaminophen so hard to study? Reason 1: itβs hard to measure. Acetaminophen (APAP) is available over the counter and by prescription, alone or in combination with other medications. Studies often rely on parental recall, which varies in accuracy, or prescription fills, which miss OTC use.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβve also written a commentary about some of the challenges (posted here by @dremilyrsmith.bsky.social ) bsky.app/profile/drem...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβve published 2 papers on acetaminophen in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes, both as methods supervisor for a doctoral student who was the first author, from the MoBa study. Iβll drop the links at the end of the thread- both are open access either via PMC or the journal website.
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs hard to know whether talking about these things is helpful or just gives them more oxygen, but the current acetaminophen fire is already roaring so here we go. Most importantly: ACOG affirms their position that acetaminophen is safe in pregnancy bsky.app/profile/acog...
23.09.2025 09:15 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 2 π 1...either pull the (accepted!!) paper and resubmit somewhere with free open access, or self-archive the submitted version of the manuscript (essentially a post hoc preprint) to PMC and then update to accepted version after embargo. Any other options I'm not considering? What have others done? (3/3)
22.09.2025 16:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0...but there was no budget in the F for OA fees (and the T32 no longer exists π’). Asked journal to waive OA fee given circumstances (nope), looked for institution funding to support (lol). I think the remaining options are... (2/3)
22.09.2025 16:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm hoping for advice from NIH funded researchers re the updated OA policy (grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...). Specifically: I have students funded on an F31 or T32 whose papers were submitted this spring and accepted after 7/1. Per policy, those papers must be OA from pub date... (1/3)
22.09.2025 16:32 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0A slide presented at the 18 September ACIP meeting (linked in the post). Links to CDC run studies on COVID vaccine safety in pregnancy. A list of outcomes not associated with COVID vaccination in pregnancy in these studies, including miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, major birth defects, maternal or infant ICU admission.
Props to the CDC staff who presented the science at yesterdayβs #ACIP meeting.
Key points relating to #CovidVaccination in #pregnancyβ¦
1. No increased risk of any problems in pregnancy, at birth, or for infants
1/
www.cdc.gov/acip/downloa...
Euler diagrams, maybe, from someone who said "you-ler" for an embarrassingly long time?
19.09.2025 10:33 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Yep! At UNC, epid doc students write a dissertation proposal (usually a background/lit review plus planned methods). Committee reviews written proposal, and there is an oral defense/exam. Timing is after passing qual. exams.
16.09.2025 10:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Photo of four women smiling.
I don't know how many of my ISPE friends (and enemies...?) are on here, but (a) the ISPE Peer Mentoring program is currently taking applications and (b) it's GREAT, you should probably sign up. Link: www.pharmacoepi.org/get-involved...
02.09.2025 21:35 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The thing about middle age is that one of your hips always lies and the other always tells the truth.
01.09.2025 19:54 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0I went to a talk last year and remember thinking: did he just say we should use AI to create study samples? Not for simulation studies, but to answer an applied question? I must have misheard, thatβs clearly bonkers.
Anyway, here we are.
1. The philosophy of science sometimes gets an unearned reputation as a purely academic exercise that offers little by way of concrete tools for advancing research.
This is wrong.
And today, as we grapple with how AI is changing the nature of scientific activity, it's desperately wrong.