Hannah van Binsbergen's Avatar

Hannah van Binsbergen

@hannahvanbins.bsky.social

Schrijver. Poëzie & socialisme. Laatste boek: Kokanje. Volgende boek: De Garde (verwacht 2026). Oprichtend hoofdredacteur Jacobin Nederland.

454 Followers  |  92 Following  |  18 Posts  |  Joined: 07.11.2024  |  2.5645

Latest posts by hannahvanbins.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
This fall: Thursday in six parts read my speculative novella about an ancient language at the edge of a forest

open.substack.com/pub/illstarr...

28.08.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

From September 19, I will be posting a chapter every two weeks, on the same day of the week that the story takes place. There are six instalments. The final one will appear at the end of autumn. The first chapter will be open to everyone, the rest will only be available to paying subscribers.

28.08.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Thursday is the story of a community. Every weeknight, the families gather. They repeat the sounds of an ancient language, preserving it from oblivion. But there is a history the community has forgotten. And there is something or someone in the forest outside, waiting to come back in.

28.08.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

In 2024 I wrote a story about what could come after a time of death. It is my way of thinking through these times. In my mind it is very much about both the Palestinian genocide and the destruction of the living world, but it does not reference these things directly. It is a kind of parable.

28.08.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

From September 19 you can read my novella Thursday on Substack. Description below.

28.08.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Are we doomed yet? I might be worried about my income, but not about the future of literature. Machines and writing have a more harmonious past than you might think.

Read the full essay: illstarredletter.substack.com/p/are-we-doo...

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

The old techniques of alienation don’t work anymore. The reader is pre-alienated, already suspicion of the humanity behind written text. The new machine poetry plays with that suspicion, and encourages us to be suspicious of the robotic tendencies in ourselves and our favourite human writers.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

The problem is that there is nothing random about LLMs. They are not surprising, and have gone to great pains to not be uncouth. The response to them in the first generation of AI poetry reflects this break with the machine poetry of the past.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Poets who embraced machines, from Tzara to flarf, did so because of the surprising, ludicrous results they yielded ran contrary to the expectations that readers had of poetry. Chance combination can open up possibilities that a mind can’t see.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Long before there was internet, there have been language generation machines, and poets have loved fiddling with them.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

But where in visual art there is a fair bit of exploration of the possibility of a serious art made with AI, I haven’t seen a lot to that extent in literature (there are exceptions, of course). But there is a ready-made tradition for it.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The response of the book industry to AI has been mostly defensive, emphasising the uniqueness of human writers and translators. It’s a game of real vs fake, original vs knockoff. I get it, it’s their copyright being infringed upon.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

They mimic emotion and consciousness astonishingly well. According to ChatGPT-5, its system is ‘weighted toward choosing certain patterns of words that align with being polite, clear and empathetic.’ And this makes LLMs bad, bad writers.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

AI generated literature is drivel, because the text LLMs produce are meant to be the opposite of literature: smooth, reassuring and inoffensive. And, ultimately, deceitful, because models like ChatGPT are made to conceal what they actually are: not a human voice, but a fancy text predictor.

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

🧵I might be worried about my income, but not about the future of literature. Machines and writing have a more harmonious past than you might think.
illstarredletter.substack.com/p/are-we-doo...

21.08.2025 10:40 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

❤️❤️❤️

04.08.2025 18:36 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
an ill-starred letter to the readers of the future

An often overlooked way for literature to be political is to be of use to a revolutionary actor. Not primarily to instruct or to propagate, but to furnish the difficult work of politics with imagination. read more: illstarredletter.substack.com/p/an-ill-sta...

04.08.2025 13:39 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 1
Preview
the ill-starred letter | Hannah van Binsbergen | Substack The ill-starred letter is substack by Hannah van Binsbergen, author and poet, on literature and the left. Click to read the ill-starred letter, by Hannah van Binsbergen, a Substack publication. Launch...

Hey everyone, I started a newsletter about literature and the left: the ill-starred letter. illstarredletter.substack.com?r=49bt0&utm_...

04.08.2025 10:05 — 👍 6    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 1

@hannahvanbins is following 20 prominent accounts