And wait until you double down with Reform
23.10.2025 09:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@agarzon.bsky.social
Business Ethics & Business of Biotech at University College Dublin. Philosophy & Business graduate
And wait until you double down with Reform
23.10.2025 09:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes that is one of our findings
05.10.2025 19:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0To some extent, yes. The problem is that consequences are long term and most business leaders operate short term. I
01.10.2025 05:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Does bad ethics pay?
💊 Drug price hikes are meant to boost profits—but our research (with @CeADARIreland) shows they can backfire when public sentiment turns negative.
Read more: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
#DrugPricing 👇
Our study shows that who is unhappy—and when—matters.
If public opinion around pricing turns sour among scientists, policymakers, or the public, the financial risks are real.
#DrugPricing #PublicSentiment #BusinessEthics
So, does “bad ethics pay”?
Sometimes, in the short run. But not always—and it may hurt in the long term, especially when the right people are watching.
🧪📢⚖️
And what about the long term?
We found that firms facing less negative sentiment over time outperformed those with more public backlash.
Higher short-term returns don’t guarantee long-term success.
📉⏳
But not all stakeholders respond the same way.
When scientific or political news outlets express negative sentiment, firm performance drops.
These communities hold reputational and regulatory power—and their criticism can sting.
#StakeholderPower
First, the short term.
When business, finance, and legal news outlets or Reddit users react negatively to drug prices, firm performance often goes up.
Why? These audiences may interpret it as a bold, profit-maximising move.
#ShortTermGains
We analysed news and social media sentiment around drug pricing and matched it with financial data from pharma firms.
The goal? To see whether public outrage has financial consequences.
Does bad ethics pay?
💊 Drug price hikes are meant to boost profits—but our research (with @CeADARIreland) shows they can backfire when public sentiment turns negative.
Read more: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
#DrugPricing 👇
This government could be the best thing to happen to Europe - or at least not as bad as we thought at the start
29.03.2025 13:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Enhorabuena!
27.03.2025 20:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Muy interesante análisis de los retos de traducir filosofía al español de mi amigo @msanchezr.bsky.social
14.03.2025 18:35 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You’re absolutely right—it hasn’t gone mainstream yet. I believe our biggest conceptual enemy is the harmful false dichotomy between strategy and ethics. This has led business curricula to treat ethics as an afterthought rather than an integral part of strategy and profit maximisation.
09.03.2025 11:11 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Contrary to popular perception, that balance is already a big part of business education. We emphasise that maximising self-interest isn’t possible without restraint and consideration for others. Like many other groups, our reputation is often shaped by the more negative examples (sigh).
09.03.2025 10:23 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Absolutely. The European project should be more than a geographical reality.
17.02.2025 12:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very interesting. I would add reducing the distance with students. It is tempting to shield yourself behind your status but in the end I think it damages engagement
20.01.2025 14:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What if the US is Saruman?
08.01.2025 15:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Quedan 11 días para la presentación de nuestro libro en la SEFA, abajo está el link del evento y en el siguiente post dejamos un cupón descuento para la edición en pbk, cortesía de Routledge 👏👏🎉👏🎉👏
07.12.2024 18:33 — 👍 6 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 1Pero fuiste tú?
03.12.2024 21:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Fascinating study on the importance of philosophical acumen in protecting us from pseudo beliefs: “it wasn’t education level ❌ per se that predicted immunity to pseudoscientific claims, but rather an understanding of the philosophy behind scientific inquiry.”
02.12.2024 23:21 — 👍 2 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0El 18 de diciembre presentamos nuestro libro ‘Experiments in moral and political philosophy’ (Routledge 2024) en la Sociedad Española de Filosofía Analìtica (SEFA) 🎉😍🎉🎉🎉🎉🥰🎉🎉
Será online y con inscripción previa @hugoviciana.bsky.social  
www.sefaweb.es
Great book on experimental philosophy 👇🏼
16.11.2024 10:29 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Interesado en el pensamiento moral de Kant? La mejor traducción que existe al Español la ha publicado mi amigo @bonobeando.bsky.social
15.11.2024 15:13 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0La introducción que escribiste es muy elegante y bastante clara.
15.11.2024 15:09 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0