Antonio Garzón's Avatar

Antonio Garzón

@agarzon.bsky.social

Business Ethics & Business of Biotech at University College Dublin. Philosophy & Business graduate

810 Followers  |  150 Following  |  23 Posts  |  Joined: 19.10.2024  |  2.103

Latest posts by agarzon.bsky.social on Bluesky

And wait until you double down with Reform

23.10.2025 09:11 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Yes that is one of our findings

05.10.2025 19:22 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

To some extent, yes. The problem is that consequences are long term and most business leaders operate short term. I

01.10.2025 05:23 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
The Public Strikes Back: How Ethical Sentiment Influences the Financial Consequences of Drug Pricing Decisions This study investigates whether profit-maximizing actions perceived as ethically questionablespecifically, increasing drug prices-ultimately benefit or harm fir

Does bad ethics pay?
💊 Drug price hikes are meant to boost profits—but our research (with @CeADARIreland) shows they can backfire when public sentiment turns negative.
Read more: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
#DrugPricing 👇

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 1    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1

Our study shows that who is unhappy—and when—matters.
If public opinion around pricing turns sour among scientists, policymakers, or the public, the financial risks are real.
#DrugPricing #PublicSentiment #BusinessEthics

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 2    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

So, does “bad ethics pay”?
Sometimes, in the short run. But not always—and it may hurt in the long term, especially when the right people are watching.
🧪📢⚖️

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

And what about the long term?
We found that firms facing less negative sentiment over time outperformed those with more public backlash.
Higher short-term returns don’t guarantee long-term success.
📉⏳

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

But not all stakeholders respond the same way.
When scientific or political news outlets express negative sentiment, firm performance drops.
These communities hold reputational and regulatory power—and their criticism can sting.
#StakeholderPower

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

First, the short term.
When business, finance, and legal news outlets or Reddit users react negatively to drug prices, firm performance often goes up.
Why? These audiences may interpret it as a bold, profit-maximising move.
#ShortTermGains

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

We analysed news and social media sentiment around drug pricing and matched it with financial data from pharma firms.
The goal? To see whether public outrage has financial consequences.

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
The Public Strikes Back: How Ethical Sentiment Influences the Financial Consequences of Drug Pricing Decisions This study investigates whether profit-maximizing actions perceived as ethically questionablespecifically, increasing drug prices-ultimately benefit or harm fir

Does bad ethics pay?
💊 Drug price hikes are meant to boost profits—but our research (with @CeADARIreland) shows they can backfire when public sentiment turns negative.
Read more: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
#DrugPricing 👇

16.04.2025 10:50 — 👍 1    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1

This government could be the best thing to happen to Europe - or at least not as bad as we thought at the start

29.03.2025 13:11 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Enhorabuena!

27.03.2025 20:29 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Muy interesante análisis de los retos de traducir filosofía al español de mi amigo @msanchezr.bsky.social

14.03.2025 18:35 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

You’re absolutely right—it hasn’t gone mainstream yet. I believe our biggest conceptual enemy is the harmful false dichotomy between strategy and ethics. This has led business curricula to treat ethics as an afterthought rather than an integral part of strategy and profit maximisation.

09.03.2025 11:11 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Contrary to popular perception, that balance is already a big part of business education. We emphasise that maximising self-interest isn’t possible without restraint and consideration for others. Like many other groups, our reputation is often shaped by the more negative examples (sigh).

09.03.2025 10:23 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Absolutely. The European project should be more than a geographical reality.

17.02.2025 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Very interesting. I would add reducing the distance with students. It is tempting to shield yourself behind your status but in the end I think it damages engagement

20.01.2025 14:23 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

What if the US is Saruman?

08.01.2025 15:31 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Quedan 11 días para la presentación de nuestro libro en la SEFA, abajo está el link del evento y en el siguiente post dejamos un cupón descuento para la edición en pbk, cortesía de Routledge 👏👏🎉👏🎉👏

07.12.2024 18:33 — 👍 6    🔁 4    💬 1    📌 1

Pero fuiste tú?

03.12.2024 21:36 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Fascinating study on the importance of philosophical acumen in protecting us from pseudo beliefs: “it wasn’t education level ❌ per se that predicted immunity to pseudoscientific claims, but rather an understanding of the philosophy behind scientific inquiry.”

02.12.2024 23:21 — 👍 2    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0
SEFA | Sociedad Española de Filosofía Analítica

El 18 de diciembre presentamos nuestro libro ‘Experiments in moral and political philosophy’ (Routledge 2024) en la Sociedad Española de Filosofía Analìtica (SEFA) 🎉😍🎉🎉🎉🎉🥰🎉🎉

Será online y con inscripción previa @hugoviciana.bsky.social

www.sefaweb.es

18.11.2024 10:52 — 👍 23    🔁 11    💬 1    📌 1

Great book on experimental philosophy 👇🏼

16.11.2024 10:29 — 👍 4    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

Interesado en el pensamiento moral de Kant? La mejor traducción que existe al Español la ha publicado mi amigo @bonobeando.bsky.social

15.11.2024 15:13 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

La introducción que escribiste es muy elegante y bastante clara.

15.11.2024 15:09 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@agarzon is following 20 prominent accounts